Browsing: Problems with mouse ============================= Many contemporary views of computer suggest mice are essential, especially for browsing hypertext. I disagree because: Speed - My typing is 10 times faster than clicking a mouse on displayed letters or selecting hypertext. Natural - People instinctively use the cursor control system adopted by word processors and HyperRez. Physical - The physical effort to move a mouse is magnitudes greater than pressing arrow keys. Mental - The hand-eye mental coordination required to locate, then click on a specified location is exhausting if compared to the Up/Dn arrows that automatically highlight each jump. Recall - The arrow selection approach includes memory of the position in the text of the previous jump, serving as an automatic place marker. These Left-arrow place markers are essential to systematic exploration of networks. (Press PgDn) Commentary ========== The benefits of arrow browsing also applies to graphic as well as textual information. With graphic information, I include 5-7 callouts (short descriptive text) using the Up/Dn arrows to highlight each in turn, and the Right arrow to select -- all easier and faster than using a mouse! Why are callouts so important? First. In eye-movement and readership studies, picture captions and callouts are the first elements noticed, and consequently a most important component in graphic information. Second. Callouts automatically identify both the purpose of and the important abstractions contained in the graphic information. Conclusion ========== I prefer arrows over mice for effective browsing of hypertext!