New Age in Schools: Who is Dr. Herbert Benson? by Craig Branch In February of this year, ABC's 20/20 ran a segment on the growth of interest in the use of meditation in therapeutic situations. Dr. Tim Johnson focused on Dr. Herbert Benson as a pioneer in this field, even allowing himself as a demonstration of how easy it is to be taken into this altered state. Herbert Benson is a name that also frequently appears in transpersonal (New Age) education literature, and in some current and popular curricula. Benson's work and books, "The Relaxation Response" and "Beyond the Relaxation Response," are used to justify and give some sort of scientific credibility to the use of progressive relaxation techniques in the classroom. For example, Don Dinkmeyer, developer of D.U.S.O., cites Benson in his article "Holistic Approaches to Health" in the "Elementary School Guidance and Counseling" journal. After citing meditation and yoga as appropriate ways to deal with stress, Dinkmeyer writes, "Herbert Benson was one of the first to indicate the value of the relaxation response, a simple meditative technique that unlocks your strength and assets... improving physical and emotional health.... Counselors and other educators might well consider and study the value of Benson's type of meditation for teachers and students" (Don Dinkmeyer, Holisitic Approach to Health, Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, December, 1979, pp. 108-110). Another example found in the "Elementary School Guidance and Counseling" journal reported on an experimental study conducted on kindergarten through sixth grade students. The study tried to determine the effectiveness of relaxation techniques to increase a students "on-task" behavior and thus enhance learning potential. The authors employed the "quieting reflex," "autogenics," and Benson's "breathing and progressive relaxation" techniques on a daily basis with students. The authors concluded that "the use of psycho physiological relaxation training as an alternative or adjunct to traditional approaches (i.e., external stimulus reduction, drugs, behavior modification, or cognitive behavior modification) for promoting on-task behaviors have several advantages" (Dick Oldfield, Richard Petoss, "Increasing Student On-Task Behaviors Through Relaxation Strategies," Elementary School and Guidance Counseling, February, 1986, p.185). The fact that Benson's meditation technique of progressive relaxation is being recommended as a psychological tool for dealing with problem behavior accentuates many parent's valid concerns that children are being made to participate in hypnotherapy and meditation in regular classrooms. Not only is this unacceptable on a religious basis, but ethically and legally as well. Whether or not it should be used individually treating children with emotional difficulties is another issue. These approaches should not be used with healthy children with a shotgun approach in the regular classroom. Yet the bombardment from a certain segment of educators continues. In the health textbook of one of the largest and most popular publishing companies, Merrill Publishing, we find a section on stress management promoting "autogenics" (self- hypnosis), and Herbert Benson's meditation technique of progressive relaxation. The author describes Benson's relaxation response as meditation which is a technique used to alter the state of consciousness ("Meeks, Heit, Health: A Wellness Approach," Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Co., 1991, p.138). Another example of the use of progressive relaxation techniques used in therapy for problem behavior is described by elementary guidance counselor Dick Oldfield. He writes in the April 1986 issue of the "Elementary School Guidance and Counseling" journal, that Benson's Relaxation Response was used in a study to determine if it should be a methodology for remediating to prevent acting-out behavior and promoting a self-concept. Oldfield described "acting-out" to mean "disruptive, inappropriate" (Dick Oldfield, "The Effects of the relaxation response on self-concept and acting out behaviors," Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, April 1986, p.255). In Oldfield's research experiment, he exposed fourth, fifth, and six grades to Benson's Relaxation Response, self- described as a simplification of a form of "mantra meditation" (Ibid., p.256). Oldfield states that the instruction included "breathing, internal counting, and monitored meditation practices" (Ibid., p.257). His conclusions were that regular meditation periods are effective as a therapy of systematic desensitization (i.e., a drugless, tranquilizing "drug") for students exhibiting destructive behavior. Do you want your child exposed to this radical "treatment" in the regular classrooms? Someone once used the analogy, "it would be like knowing that in a classroom of thirty students, five would probably have cancer, so the school treated all thirty with chemotherapy." Benson's Relaxation Response also serves as the model for "scientific" justification of many self-esteem, stress reduction, and decision-making curricula in our public schools. "Teenage Health Teaching Modules," developed and funded in part by the Centers of Disease Control and the Department of Health and Human Services, builds its entire Activity Five section of "Handling Stress" on Benson's relaxation-meditation (Teenage Health Teaching Modules, Handling Stress, 1983, p.36). The program claims to be cognitive and affective in its approach. But in its introductory comments, the authors demonstrate not only the contradiction between cognitive and affective, but also the shallow and illogical reasoning, and inappropriateness of this approach. "They note that some people try to relieve feelings of stress by smoking, drinking alcohol, taking pills, or over-eating. While these remedies may make some people feel better temporarily, in the long run they do not remove the stressors, they do not change our personal perceptions, and they do not make the stressful life events disappear.... A better response to stress is conscious relaxation" (Ibid., pp.37-38). Following the faulty logic, they are saying that it is inappropriate to artificially deal with stress by engaging in the listed behaviors, because they do not remove the stressors. They are only an escape device. But then they offer the solution of using the drugless "drug" of self-hypnosis/meditation as a solution. The question needs to be asked, "what is the difference?" It too is an escape mechanism that doesn't remove stressors. It certainly is not cognitive! And repeated meditation can incur some serious harmful effects. The "Handling Stress" section goes on to employ progressive relaxation techniques, the use of a mantra (repetition of a word or phrase), a passive attitude, repeated deep breathing exercises while counting backwards and descending staircase imagery, autogenics, yoga's alternate nostril breathing, and guided imagery (Ibid., pp. 38-45). Consulting any hypnosis or meditation book will demonstrate that these are the standard induction techniques for an altered state of consciousness. Some educators have objected to the accusation that Benson's model of progressive relaxation is hypnosis or promotes eastern religious meditation. This defense is totally without merit according to the documentation just given and more following. For example, some of Benson's professional colleagues, members of the National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Techniques for the Enhancement of Human Performance, makes the following observation on Benson. After a discussion of the claims of autogenics and progressive relaxation to reduce stress and enhance performance, the committee writes, "These approaches are in many ways similar to Eastern practices of meditation. Of considerable interest in the 1970's was the work of Benson, a Harvard professor of medicine who developed what he called the relaxation response, which was really a westernized version of transcendentalmeditation," ("Enhancing Human Performance: Issues, Theories, and Techniques," National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, 1988, p.122). If a popular health textbook, the professional journal of the American School Counselors Association, and the Natural Academy of Sciences all recognize Benson's "Relaxation Response" as meditation, why are some school officials having such a difficult time admitting it? Perhaps the parents concerns of educational tyranny, arrogance, and dishonesty on the part of some educators are justified. This concern is accentuated when one reads Marilyn Ferguson's comments in the New Age Manifesto, "The Aquarian Conspiracy." In her chapter detailing the infiltration of the New Age Movement into the political and government bureaucracies, she notes how changing the name of transcendental meditation enabled its assimilation into the U.S. Navy. She writes, "Under a human-resources management contract led by the navy in San Diego, Jay Matteson helped organize an appropriate course. Matteson knew that he could never get away with teaching meditation in the navy. He also knew that he was also unlikely to get approval for teaching the relaxation- response technique adapted by Herbert Benson of Harvard from Transcendental Meditation. Matteson got the course approved as 'Dynamic Methods of Coping'" (The Aquarian Conspiracy, p. 237). And finally, to clear any doubt of the fact that Benson's "Relaxation-Response" is based on the beliefs and practices of eastern religious meditation, let Benson speak for himself. Benson writes in his seminal book, The Relaxation Response, "This book brings together and synthesizes recent scientific data with age-old Eastern and Western writings that establish the existence of an innate human capability: The Relaxation Response.... It has been evoked in the religions of both East and West for most of recorded history," (The Relaxation Response, pp.9, 175). He repeatedly reveals the source of his technique in comments like, "From the collected writings of the East and West, we have devised a simplified method of eliciting the Relaxation Response.... The altered state of consciousness associated with the Relaxation Response has been routinely experienced in Eastern and Western cultures throughout all ages" (Ibid., pp.81-86, 107-109, 112-135). Although Benson claims that his technique is merely the scientific validation of age old wisdom, it is in fact based on and promotes religion, not to mention using a controversial hypnotherapeutic, escapist, potentially harmful technique on our children. It would be like a teacher coming to class and introducing a new technique to help the children clear their minds, relax, and receive special power to learn or take the test. The teacher then leads the class in bowing their heads, folding their hands in front of them, closing their eyes and silently communicating to an outside source invoking peace and power for that day. How long would it be before the A.C.L.U. would be on cite complaining that the teacher was leading in and promoting prayer in the schools? The teacher never said prayer or God, yet the techniques and concepts were clearly based on religious tradition.