Document 1011 DOCN M9471011 TI Miller v. Spicer. DT 9409 SO Federal Supplement. 1993 May 7 (date of decision);822:158-174. Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE KIE/42588 AB The U.S. District Court of Delaware held that an individual could bring a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress and that an issue of material fact existed as to whether a hospital discriminated against the individual when he was refused medical treatment based upon his perceived sexual preference and his HIV status. The court also held that a breach of implied contract claim in this situation is prohibited under the Delaware medical malpractice statute. The plaintiff, Rod Miller, originally sought medical attention at the Beebe Clinic for a foot injury. He was advised that surgery should be performed as soon as possible, but the resident surgeon at the clinic refused to operate based upon the surgeon's perception that Miller was homosexual and that Miller did not know the result of a recent AIDS test. Miller contends he has suffered permanent damage to his foot due to the loss in time incurred in his transfer to a different hospital. He is suing both the clinic and the surgeon, Robert Spicer, alleging that such discrimination violated the Rehabilitation Act. The court determined that only the clinic, not Dr. Spicer, could be pursued under this act, which only applies to those who receive federal funding. However, Miller still retains a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress against both the physician and the hospital. DE Christianity Delaware *Homosexuality *Hospitals *HIV Seropositivity *Jurisprudence *Liability, Legal Malpractice Patient Transfer *Physicians *Prejudice *Refusal to Treat *Surgery COURT DECISION SOURCE: National Library of Medicine. NOTICE: This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.Code).