Document 0035 DOCN M9480035 TI A review of transfusion-associated AIDS litigation: 1984 through 1993. DT 9410 AU Kern JM; Croy BB; San Francisco office of the law firm Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May,; California. SO Transfusion. 1994 Jun;34(6):484-91. Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE MED/94295062 AB BACKGROUND: Since 1984, hundreds of lawsuits have been filed against health care providers in the United States, alleging transmission of human immunodeficiency virus by transfusion. While anecdotal reports of jury verdicts have been published, no quantitative study to identify trends in transfusion-associated AIDS litigation has been undertaken. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To identify trends in lawsuits filed against health care providers alleging human immunodeficiency virus infection transmitted via transfusion, 163 legal actions were analyzed. Included were those for which the authors provided legal defense or consultation (n = 79) and cases reported nationally (n = 84). Cases were analyzed as to characteristics of defendant(s), date of transfusion and case filing, liability theories, and verdict, if applicable. RESULTS: Defendants were blood centers (74% of cases), hospitals (58%), and physicians (53%). Of physicians, surgeons were named in 78 percent of cases; 42 percent of these surgeons were cardiothoracic surgeons. Nationally, 14 cases have resulted in plaintiff awards totalling $75,420,798. Physicians have been liable for 41 percent of that sum, blood banks 31 percent, and hospitals 26 percent. Of the 10 liability theories raised, the most frequent were claims of medical negligence (46% of cases), failure to identify high-risk donors (45%), lack of informed consent (39%), and failure to conduct surrogate testing (39%). Twenty-six trial results favorable to health care providers were noted nationally, 17 occurring in the San Francisco Bay Area, where case filings peaked before 1990 (40/56) and where new case filings decreased (1990, 5; 1991, 3; 1992, 1; 1993, 0) as verdicts favoring health care providers were reported. CONCLUSION: Transfusion-associated AIDS litigation began with verdicts against blood banks, but has expanded to suits against physicians and hospitals that are based on theories of medical negligence and informed consent. Despite widely publicized verdicts for plaintiffs, health care professionals have successfully defended these lawsuits, and in one center of early litigation, a sharp decrease in new case filings has been observed. DE Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/*TRANSMISSION Blood Banks Blood Donors Blood Transfusion/*LEGISLATION & JURISPRUD Hospitals Human Informed Consent/LEGISLATION & JURISPRUD *Liability, Legal/ECONOMICS Malpractice/LEGISLATION & JURISPRUD Physicians Surgery JOURNAL ARTICLE SOURCE: National Library of Medicine. NOTICE: This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.Code).