Document 1941 DOCN M94A1941 TI Towards HIV/AIDS jurisprudence: the study on legislative responses to HIV/AIDS infected persons. DT 9412 AU Mutembei B; HIV/AIDS Unitech Program, Dar ES Salaam, Tanzania. SO Int Conf AIDS. 1994 Aug 7-12;10(1):416 (abstract no. PD0274). Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE ICA10/94370634 AB OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether legislations address the HIV/AIDS legal problems in accordance with fundamental human rights. To suggest an alternative Jurisprudencial approach to HIV/AIDS ethical and legal issue. METHODS: In the past 5 years 900 HIV-positive persons from various countries were interviewed on HIV/AIDS policies versus fundamental human rights such as the right of fair and equal treatment; right to be regarded as persons; right of equality before the law; right to freedom of movement; right to marry and establish a family; right to work etc. RESULTS: 65% claimed to have been refused the right of fair and equal treatment; 85% were refused the right to be regarded as persons; 75% expressed denial of equality before the law; 45% felt to have no legal protection; 99% were refused the right to freedom of movement several times; 35% have been refused the right to marry and establish families; 53% claim to have no social security; 65% had problems regarding employment and 25% claimed to have had no right to privacy. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study reveal that there is lack of legislative response to most of HIV/AIDS ethical/legal issues. There is therefore a need to discuss a more appropriate Jurisprudencial approach to HIV/AIDS ethical and legal issues. This presentation will suggest an alternative Jurisprudencial approach. DE *Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome *Ethics, Professional Health Policy Human Human Rights/*LEGISLATION & JURISPRUD *HIV Infections *HIV Seropositivity Interviews *Prejudice Refusal to Treat Tanzania MEETING ABSTRACT SOURCE: National Library of Medicine. NOTICE: This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.Code).