In throwing out the charter, this effectively disbanded any "formal" board of directors. The steering committee consists of: Tom Huber, chair and echolister Tom Almy, hatchmeister Dave Bealer, NC and hatchmeister Rick Arnold, promotion et al Frank Arnaud is invited to join in the steering committee, but if nothing is heard within the next couple of weeks, we'll take his non-response as a desire to "bow out" of the net's leadership. Todd Jacobs, since he never resigned or tendered a resignation, also has the same invitation open to him. Basically, I am acting as the head of the net, meaning that I will wait for input, and then make a decision based on my own feelings, but taking into account, the counsel offered by the rest of the committee. We have now, as of this message, extended an invitation to all of the sysops in the net that are interested, to provide us with your thoughts and input. So, to recap: There is no more "formal" charter in EPubNet There is no more "formal" board of directors, or fixed number of leaders at the head of EPubNet. EPubNet continues to exist under the direction of a steering committee. Invitations may be extended to others to join in an official capacity. All EPubNet sysops are invited to provide the committee with their input on all issues. They are also invited to suggest any proposals that they may think pertinent to the net. Final decisions on any Echo rests, as it does in the fidonet world, with the moderator. Right now, I have listed myself as key moderator for all current echoes. As moderators, or more properly, echo facilitators are appointed or volunteer, they will have this "authority" transferred to them. Final decisions regarding the nature of the net rests with me, simply in order to keep things moving. As the committee now realizes (I hope they do), I tend to get input from all interested persons before I make any decisions. I'm also very prone to reversing decisions, should a reasoned argument be present to me. The net now has an important matter to decide upon and that is, a "mission statement," in leiu of any formalized charter. Right now, the committee is leaning toward a short, sweet, and to the point, statement, which says, in effect: EPubNet is a network, formed by VOLUNTEERS, which provides distribution and discussion of electronic books, magazines, information, and other electronic media. The echoes are as follows: EP-ANNOUNCE - Read-only conference for all users except those appointed to feed back a listing so that those hatching files will know that the file has made it "through the system." EP-GENERAL - General chat/discussion conference. EP-PUBLISH - The Business of Electronic Publishing. EP-SYSOP - EPubNet sysop echo, used for discussing any matter of concern to the net. EP-BOARD - Now inactive, but considered part of the net. The first four echoes are carried on Planet Connect and will continue to be carried by that means. Planet Connect lists several other echoes as part of EPubNet. I will review the purpose of these echoes. If I feel we may have a need for these echoes, I'll add them to my monthly ELIST update. So there you have it. A lot of discussion centered around the decision to bring the discussion in front of all sysops. However, I wanted a method to keep some semblance of order, and therefore, asked the former board if they wanted to continue participating as a steering committee. I received positive support from each of them. My listing shows four echoes that we have abandoned: EP-ADMIN EP-AUTHOR EP-BOOKSTORE EP-TOOLS Should we decide, as a group, to seek out other networks that have an interest in Electronic Publishing, either as a primary objective or one that is ancillary, then we may need these. Here's what I see as potential purpose: EP-ADMIN - to deal with administrative issues, primarily as a "public" form of EP-BOARD. Given the new organization of the net, I'm going to ELIST this, just to establish a "placeholder." For now, EP-SYSOP carries any and all traffic that might be associated with this echo. EP-AUTHOR has a great deal of interest to me, since I "are" one . I see this as a potential place for authors to discuss there concerns. Not only am I going to ELIST this, I'm going to activate it as part of my system. If others want to reactivate this echo area, that's fine. At least, we'll have an echo in place for author-to-author discussions, which does not have to be limited to electronic publishing. EP-BOOKSTORE. I'll ELIST this, just to establish a placeholder. If we do join with another net, this will serve for announcements of publications that are not part of our FDS (file distribution system). EP-TOOLS. This is an echo that I'm also going to ELIST and activate. The reason is that there is a lot going on in the electronic world, especially in the internet. I have the full text for the proposed HTML Version 3.0 standard. There are things happening in stand-alone readers, and ways to use internet browsers, locally. While these things could be covered in either EP-PUBLISH or EP-GENERAL, I can see the possibility of needing this as a stand-alone forum. Now, let no one say that I'm standing still on the issues of echoes. While I certainly see no need to expand to the degree that Sandie did with her AuthorsNet, I see several other possible echoes: EP-EDIT - for editors to discuss editing techniques, the current state of the industry (as far as editors go), and how an editor can hope to survive - perhaps for the purpose of getting involved with production of multimedia, on-line manuals, and so on. EP-PROGRAM - for programmers to discuss programming in the new "languages" of electronic publishing, specifically in developing macros, templates, readers, etc., that will recognize or be recognized either independently of the internet, or in stand-alone situations. This could and would include discussions of BBS Doors, though I would prefer to see emphasis to downloading the material, and then reading the electronic publication off-line. But that's just me. EP-MULTIMEDIA - for discussion about the problems that this form of publishing provides. There may be suitable fidonet echoes (I'll have to check my latest listing) or there may be independent "nets" established for this purpose already. There is no reason why they couldn't be invited to join the net. I'm not suggesting that we establish these echoes yet, but certainly feel they need to be given some serious consideration, especially by those systems that are lurking and may be looking for something like this. If I don't hear dissenting votes that present reasoned arguments against establishing these echoes, I'm going to ELIST them (probably in February), just to establish placeholders. Who is our link to Planet Connect? What would be the problem of adding these to the current crop of echoes that they carry for us? Are there limitations as to the number of echoes that we can put into the system?