Computer underground Digest Thu Dec 19, 1996 Volume 8 : Issue 90 ISSN 1004-042X Editor: Jim Thomas (cudigest@sun.soci.niu.edu) News Editor: Gordon Meyer (gmeyer@sun.soci.niu.edu) Archivist: Brendan Kehoe Shadow Master: Stanton McCandlish Field Agent Extraordinaire: David Smith Shadow-Archivists: Dan Carosone / Paul Southworth Ralph Sims / Jyrki Kuoppala Ian Dickinson Cu Digest Homepage: http://www.soci.niu.edu/~cudigest CONTENTS, #8.90 (Thu, Dec 19, 1996) File 1--NetAction Notes No. 9 File 2--Report of working party on illegal/harmful Net Content (fwd) File 3--Cu Digest Header Info (unchanged since 13 Dec, 1996) CuD ADMINISTRATIVE, EDITORIAL, AND SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION ApPEARS IN THE CONCLUDING FILE AT THE END OF EACH ISSUE. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 02:39:25 -0800 (PST) From: Audrie Krause Subject: File 1--NetAction Notes No. 9 NetAction Notes ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Published by NetAction Issue No. 9 December 5, 1996 Repost where appropriate. Copyright and subscription info at end of message. * * * * * * * IN THIS ISSUE: Resources for Virtual Activists How to Help NetAction ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Resources for Virtual Activists There are many useful resources available for Virtual Activists, and the number and variety of these resources is growing constantly. This issue of NetAction Notes focuses on some that I consider particularly useful. I welcome feedback from readers about other online resources for political activism, and will pass along information about your favorites in future issues of NetAction Notes. There is also an extensive listing of activist resources on the NetAction Web site at: . This sampler includes a Web site for contacting Congress, a few good books on the subject of Internet and grassroots activism, upcoming conferences on the role of the Internet in politics and the potential for fundraising online, and an innovative online training in civil disobedience. Since all of these resources are aimed primarily at activists in the U.S., I hope that readers outside the U.S. will share information about similar online resources elsewhere. Congress Online ========== Two consulting firms recently announced a new interactive information service that makes it possible for organizations to more easily mobilize grassroots political activism. One of the services is available without cost on the Internet, and is an excellent tool for activists to bookmark and non-profit organizations with Web sites to link to. The Web site provides contact information and background on members of Congress. The Web site is called Congress.org . There is also a fee-based service, aimed at corporations and trade associations, that customizes the information for the customer's own Web sites for their members and other users. Volunteers with technical skills might want to consider helping non-profit groups in their community develop similar resources, since grassroots groups are seldom able to pay for these services. The Congress.org Web site includes a comprehensive database of Representatives and Senators, their committee assignments, and a list of key people on their staffs. The information has been updated for the new 105th Congress, which will convene on Jan. 7, 1997. The site also includes a feature that enables visitors to find their own members of Congress by typing in the nine-digit ZIP code. The developers say this is a more accurate system than Web sites that use the five-digit ZIP code. The individual listings have a wealth of background information, and the site includes a primer on the legislative process, and tips on lobbying. The site is a joint project of Issue Dynamics Inc. (IDI) and Capitol Advantage (CA) . A Few Good Books ========== The Activist's Handbook by Randy Shaw, and NetActivism: How Citizens Use the Internet, (ADD URL) by Ed Schwartz, are two great resources for longtime activists and those who are just getting started. And to help pay the bills, Fundraising on the Internet, by Nick Allen, Mal Warwick, and Michael Stein, provides practical information on how non-profit organizations can use the Internet to communicate with members and raise funds to support activist work. Randy Shaw is Director and Supervising Attorney for the Tenderloin Housing Clinic in San Francisco, and a longtime activist on urban issues. A primer on effective organizing strategies, The Activist's Handbook explains how to inspire "fear and loathing" in politicians, how to build diverse coalitions, and how to harness the media, the courts, and the electoral process to achieve one's goals. The pro-active strategies discussed in the book are useful whether the goal is to improve housing for the urban poor, preserve a natural resource, or expose a corporate abuse. The Activist's Handbook Web site also has links to The Activist's Angle: Analysis, Advice, and Strategy, which is a monthly column that elaborates on the strategies and tactics described in The Activist's Handbook. The column is currently available on the Web, but when I spoke with Randy earlier this week he indicated that he may soon be distributing it via E-mail. Information on how to purchase The Activist's Handbook by mail-order or fax is available on the Web at . Ed Schwartz is a longtime activist and political leader in Philadelphia and heads the Institute for the Study of Civic Values, . He was one of the first activists to recognize the potential of the Internet as a tool for grassroots political organizing. NetActivism is an excellent non-partisan primer on using the Internet for organizing, outreach, and coalition-building around political issues. The book is useful both to longtime activists who are new to the Internet and longtime computer users who are new to activism. On a more personal note, I had the honor of meeting Ed earlier this fall when he agreed to make a brief detour to San Francisco to meet with Bay Area Internet activists while on the West Coast to speak in Portland, OR. As a result of the seeds he planted during that visit, one of the individuals who attended his talk is now volunteering technical support to set up a community network in San Francisco's Sunset District. Information on the neighborhood network that Ed helped establish in Philadelphia is available at . NetActivism may be purchased directly via the Web at . O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., has agreed to donate a portion of each sale made via NetAction's Web page to NetAction. Fundraising on the Internet explains how non-profit organizations are beginning to use E-mail and the Web to communicate with existing members, attract new members, and raise funds to support their mission. Nick Allen and Mal Warwick are consultants at Mal Warwick & Associates, a direct mail fundraising and marketing consulting firm that assists non-profits with membership-building and fundraising. Michael Stein is the outreach and special projects manager at the Institute for Global Communication (IGC). Fundraising on the Internet includes a chapter I wrote about incorporating E-mail outreach into the organizing of a special event, as well as numerous examples of innovative and successful Internet fundraising strategies. The book also explains how traditional direct mail strategies can be transferred to the Internet. This book is available by calling a toll-free number, 1-800-217-7377. In the interest of full disclosure, I should add that I do *not* receive royalties for the chapter I contributed, which was based on my experience in organizing a successful fundraising dinner for Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR). Activist Conferences ========== For activists in the San Francisco Bay Area -- or those who'd like a good excuse to visit -- two upcoming conferences are of interest. I have a limited number of discount registration forms for those might be interested. The all-day Politics Online Conference will take place Thursday, Dec. 12, in the South San Francisco. Organizers planned this event for political, public affairs, public relations, media and technology professionals interested in learning in a non-partisan environment how best to deploy online communication technologies. Topics include pioneering online efforts of the '96 campaigns, and examples of Internet activism. Information is available by E-mail at answer@flyingkite.com, or on the Web at . The first Politics Online Conference was first held in April in Washington, D.C., and transcripts from that event are at . A second conference scheduled for Friday, January 17, 1997, in San Francisco, will focus on Fundraising on the Internet. I attended the first of these events last July, and found it to be a very useful introduction to how non-profit organizations can use the Internet to communicate with and motivate their members and use the Web and E-mail as fundraising tools. For registration information, send E-mail to mwosi@malwarwick.com, or phone Mwosi Swenson at 510-843-8888. Participants will also receive a copy of Fundraising on the Internet. Civil Disobedience Online ========== ACT UP/NY (The AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power), Free Speech TV, and DIVA TV (Damned Interfering Video Activists) recently teamed up to produce a 30-minute civil disobedience training over the Internet. This innovative effort was one of the first attempts to use the Internet's video and audio capabilities to train political activists. Video and audio versions of this training are available on the Web sites of Free Speech TV at and ACT UP at . You will need a sound card, and the RealAudio player (available for free at or the VDOLive player (available for free at to access the site. ACT UP, which is well known for AIDS awareness campaigns directed at government inaction and drug company profiteering AIDS, is generally credited with reviving disobedience tactics in the U.S. after a period in which the tactic was not widely used by progressive activists. The 30-minute online training is distilled from the five-hour sessions that ACT UP regularly hosts. It explains how and why activists use civil disobedience and describes the steps that need to be taken to ensure that a civil disobedience campaign is both safe and successful. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ How to Help NetAction Membership in NetAction supports continued publication of NetAction Notes, as well as a wide range of organizing and training activities. NetAction projects include helping grassroots organizations harness the power of the Internet as a tool for outreach and advocacy; helping activists who are already using the Internet do a more effective job of building a base of grassroots support for technology-based social and political issues; and promoting more widespread access to information technology by organizing hands-on demonstrations of the Internet. Please join NetAction today by sending a check payable to NetAction/Tides Center to: NetAction, 601 Van Ness Ave. #631, San Francisco, CA 94102. Regular membership is $50 per year; student/senior/low-income membership is $25 per year; sustaining membership is $100 per year; non-profit organization membership is $125 per year; and corporate membership is $250 per year. NetAction brochures are available for distribution at conferences and other events. If you would like a supply of brochures to distribute, send email to: akrause@igc.org, and include your name and the mailing address where you would like the brochures sent. Thanks for your support! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Copyright 1996 by NetAction/The Tides Center. All rights reserved. Material may be reposted or reproduced for non-commercial use provided NetAction is cited as the source. NetAction is a project of The Tides Center, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. NetAction is dedicated to promoting effective grassroots citizen action campaigns by creating coalitions that link online activists with grassroots organizations, providing training to online activists in effective organizing strategies, and educating the public, policymakers and the media about technology-based social and political issues. To subscribe to NetAction Notes, send a message to: . The body of the message should state: To unsubscribe at any time, send a message to: The body of the message should state: For more information about NetAction, contact Audrie Krause: E-mail: akrause@igc.org * Phone: (415) 775-8674 * Web: http://www.netaction.org Or write to: NetAction 601 Van Ness Ave., No. 631 San Francisco, CA 94102 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 14:31:22 +0100 (NFT) From: "Ulf [ISO-8859-1] M=F6ller" Subject: File 2--Report of working party on illegal/harmful Net Content (fwd) Source - fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu http://www2.echo.lu/legal/en/internet/content/wpen.html WORKING PARTY ON ILLEGAL AND HARMFUL CONTENT ON THE INTERNET Report ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Introduction At the informal Council meeting held in Bologna on 24 April 1996, European Telecommunications Ministers and Culture Ministers identified the issue of illegal and harmful content on the Internet as an urgent priority for analysis and action. While it was recognised that existing national laws apply to the Internet, agreement in a wider context appeared necessary to address the challenges raised by the specific nature of the Internet. The Commission was therefore asked to produce an analysis of the problems and to assess in particular the desirability of European or international regulation. At the end of September 1996 different Councils discussed subjects that were relevant for the request emerging from the Bologna Council. The informal meeting of Ministers of Justice and Home Affairs (26-27 September 1996, Dublin) discussed further co-operation between Member States to combat trade in human beings and sexual abuse of children, and reached informal agreement on three action projects. The Ministers of Culture and Audiovisual meeting in Galway on 25 and 26 September 1996 welcomed the fact that the issue of protection of minors and human dignity, in particular on the Internet, was going to be addressed in a Green Paper which would soon be submitted by the Commission. The Council of Telecommunications Ministers of 27 September 1996, following on from the informal Bologna Council held a broad exchange of views on the question of preventing the dissemination, via the Internet or similar networks, of illegal material and in particular material containing, or likely to lead to, violence against or sexual exploitation of children. It noted the transnational dimension of this problem and the consequent need to address it at national, European as well as international level. The Council agreed to extend the working party established following the Bologna informal meeting to include representatives of the Ministers of Telecommunications as well as access and service providers, content industries and users. The Council requested the Working Party to present concrete proposals for possible measures to combat the illegal use of Internet or similar networks in time for the Telecommunications Council of 28 November. The UK measures presented during the Council meeting should also be taken into account. The Industry Council of 8 October 1996 recognised the need for further analysis of the issues underlying development of information society policy internationally and the need for co-ordination between initiatives relating to the subject. The German proposal to host an international conference dedicated to this end to be prepared in close co-operation with the Commission and Member States was welcomed. The present report is a first response to the Council's request of 27 September 1996. It takes account of the two papers that were recently published by the Commission: the Communication on illegal and harmful content on the Internet and the Green Paper on the Protection of Minors and Human Dignity in audiovisual and information services and elaborates in practical terms some of the proposals. 2. Scope of the report Illegal content in the context of this report means content which is forbidden by national law. Although breaking the law may involve different types of sanction (civil damages for breach of copyright, for instance 1), the most serious types of illegal content are forbidden by the criminal law, which is the type of illegal content which this report refers to. Harmful content means both content which is allowed but whose distribution is restricted (adults only, for instance) and content which may offend certain users. This distinction, which is not intended as a legal definition, is dealt with in detail in the Communication on illegal and harmful content on the Internet 2 and the Green Paper on the Protection of Minors and Human Dignity in audiovisual and information services 3. Given the terms of the conclusions of the 27 September Telecommunication Council, and given the short time span available, this report concentrates on how to combat illegal and harmful content on the Internet. It recommends a number of measures that could be taken by the Member States and the Commission in relation to this subject. It indicates how the measures can be put into practice and who should be the lead actors in this process. At this stage the report does not pretend to give a full picture of all relevant issues in relation to illegal and harmful content on the Internet, nor does it deal with other on-line services. It focuses on the most pressing issues and on the actions that can be initiated by the actors concerned at short notice. It does not prejudice the more extensive discussion due to take place on the Communication and the Green Paper. The report is based on the discussions in the Working Party meetings that took place between 27 September and 28 October 1996. The first full meeting of the extended working party took place on 10 October 1996 in Brussels. At the end of the meeting, participants were requested to present their views on the various issues raised during the meeting. Reaction from Member States' representatives were requested in particular with regard to the specific legal situation vis-=E0-vis the Internet in their country, as well as the possible technical solutions envisaged. Industry representatives were asked to react especially in relation to self regulation and possible technical solutions. A draft of this report was considered at a meeting on 28 October 1996 and the report was finalised on the basis of comments made at that meeting and subsequently in writing. The report reflects the views of all participants in the Working Party, be they Government representatives, industry players or users. It does not necessarily reflect the official views of the European Commission. 3. Some examples of initiatives at the level of the Member States The remit of the Telecommunications Council to the Working Party specifically mentioned the recent initiatives taken in the UK. During the discussions of the Working Party, there was also reference to the initiative in the Netherlands. The French delegation also presented their initiative in the field of international co-operation. The German delegation made a written contribution. All these initiatives are briefly described below. The UK initiative The R3 Safety-Net initiative in the UK has been developed in discussions facilitated by the Department of Trade and Industry between service providers, the Metropolitan Police and the Home Office. The immediate and particular focus of these proposals is on child pornography, though the approach may also be applicable in the future to other types of illegal material available in the Internet. The R3 Safety-Net approach incorporate three key elements: * Rating - a legality indicator for the "normal" content of each news group, and assistance in rating activities (including adoption and promotion of the Platform for Internet Content Selection - PICS) * Reporting - a hot-line for complaints about illegal material accessible via automated telephone, mail, e-mail or fax * Responsibility - content providers should take responsibility for rating their own pages, and service providers should take responsibility for removing content brought to their attention which is persistently and deliberately misrated, or illegal. The approach establishes an independent foundation to support the adoption by Internet service providers and users of Responsible policies based on Rating and Reporting of illegal material which will provide the hotline for complaints. The Netherlands In May 1996, the Dutch Internet providers community established a "hot-line" or central facility for the reporting of child pornography on the Internet 4. The Minister of Justice fully supported this initiative. It generated widely positive reactions, including from Internet users. Until now, it has functioned very satisfactorily: content providers (users, subscribers) of child pornography in The Netherlands have removed their illegal material after the first warning of notifying the police, making subsequent action by the police unnecessary. In some cases, violations not reported to the hot line but nevertheless having become known to the police, required police action. The reporting facility operates on a voluntary basis and is financed by Dutch Internet providers. The Dutch National Criminal Intelligence Service has been involved. Presently, the reporting facility and the police are further improving their relations. France A proposal for an agreement on international co-operation with regard to the Internet was presented to a working party of the OECD by France at a meeting in Seoul on 22 and 23 October 1996. This proposal sets out a series of principles relating to the applicable law and the factors to be taken into account when determining liability. It provides for signatories to set up national regulatory frameworks including a Code of Conduct, with mutual exchange of information on the regulations adopted and an agreement to co-operate in order to approximate national practices with regard to the Internet. The proposal also includes a section on judicial and police co-operation, in particular relating to use of networks for the purpose of terrorism, drug trafficking and organised international crime. Germany In November 1996, Germany made proposals to improve self-regulation of Internet content by extending the existing self-regulatory system for content in the press and broadcasting. Providers offering harmful content are to be required to appoint commissioners for the protection of young persons who are to act as points of contact and advisers for users. Providers are also given support for setting up joint self-regulatory facilities. The initiative makes clear that the criminal law and the law on the protection of minors apply to Internet content, even if it is only stored in a volatile manner. The Internet Content Task Force, to which the major Internet Service Providers belong, has also announced a new initiative 5 including a hot-line and co-ordinated technical measures for blocking access to illegal content. Self-regulators will intervene on their own initiative, after review by an appraiser, to remove or block access to content considered as criminal internationally such as child pornography. They will act at the request of the law-enforcement authorities where content is contrary to a specific rule of German law. 4. Proposals for further action The Working Party has taken the Communication on illegal and harmful content on the Internet as a basis for elaborating the following proposals. These would need to be implemented according to the respective competences of Community and Member States. Four important points are central to the approach taken by the working party: 1. The Internet is a positive instrument, empowering citizens and educators, lowering the barriers to the creation and distribution of content and offering universal access to ever richer sources of digital information. Any action taken to deal with atypical use for illegal and harmful content should not have a disproportionate impact on Internet users and industry as a whole. 2. Information on the Internet should be allowed the same free flow as paper-based information. Any restrictions should respect fundamental rights such as freedom of expression and the right to privacy. 3. Responsibility for prosecuting and punishing those responsible for illegal content remains with the national law-enforcement authorities. 4. Industry has a responsibility to report illegal content and to remove it from their systems, and can be assisted by self-regulatory bodies. Users should also report illegal content to hot-lines.. Filtering software and rating systems can help users to avoid harmful contents. a) Self-regulation Co-operation from the industry and a fully functioning system of self-regulation are essential to limiting the flow of illegal content on the Internet. The issue of self-regulation and liability (see below) are closely connected and need to be examined together. i. Internet service providers and users should establish representative bodies in all Member States Self-regulation implies participation by industry and users: in order to do this, bodies need to exist which represent industry and users. Users can be represented either by specific Internet user groups or by consumer groups. ii. Self-regulation must fulfil certain minimum requirements * It must not hamper the ability to provide services freely within the internal market and must respect competition rules. Freedom to provide services must be ensured by any regulation of new services, whether state regulation or self-regulation. The Commission has proposed a transparency mechanism for state regulation of new services. * It should respect fundamental freedoms such as freedom of expression and the right to privacy. The self-regulation system should include * a Code of Conduct for internet service providers (access providers, host service providers and anonymous remailers) * a hot-line for complaints from the public, with appropriate safeguards against misuse * an independent self-regulatory body, including representatives of industry and users, to advise on whether or not a breach of the Code of Conduct has occurred (without prejudice to the due process of law) Appropriate publicity should be given to the existence of Codes of Conduct, hot-lines and self-regulatory bodies. Codes of Conduct should take into account the views of user groups. iii. Member States should encourage industry to set up a self-regulation system, become members of it and respect its rules The self-regulation system needs to be in compliance with and supported by the legal system. Service providers are subject to the law, but compliance with self-regulation could be used as evidence that reasonable efforts have been used to remove or prevent access to illegal content. Member States have the power to take measures which could be used only if a service provider failed to comply with the rules of the self-regulation system, or if the self-regulation system ceased to function effectively. They can also require that the Code of Conduct be formally approved. Observation of the Code of Conduct could also be made a condition of contracts between network operators and service providers, provided that network operators are not required to act as a regulatory body. iv. The role of self-regulatory bodies The role of self-regulators is to use their best efforts to restrict the flow of illegal content on the Internet. Where self-regulators become aware of illegal content, they should take steps to ensure its removal by informing the host service providers. Where the content emanates from abroad, they should pass information to the host country's self-regulator. They should also if requested transmit appropriate information to the police to allow them to fulfil their tasks, or to exchange information with another police force. The hot-line could be reinforced by "citizens' watch" groups set up by user organisations who would pledge to report to the hot-line illegal content found during their use of Internet. If necessary, appropriate legislation should make clear that possession of illegal material by those involved in self-regulation for purposes of self-regulation is not illegal. v. There should be European co-ordination of representative and self-regulation bodies The Commission should collaborate in establishing and contributing towards the initial cost of co-ordination at European level of industry, user and self-regulation bodies. This co-ordination should include common standards for national Codes of Conduct. A European network of hot-lines should be established. b) Liability i. Internet service providers should only be liable for illegal content where they are themselves the content provider, or where they have been informed and failed to take reasonable steps to remove illegal content from a service which they offer. It is important to identify accurately the chain of responsibilities in order to place the liability for illegal content on those who create it. Service providers and network operators involved in storing, transmitting or facilitating access to content should only be liable to the extent that they have been informed of illegal content by the appropriate law-enforcement body or self-regulatory body and can take measures to remove such content from circulation. They should not be required actively to seek out illegal material. If they become aware of material which appears to be illegal, they should report it to the self-regulatory body. ii. Anonymous use of the Internet Anonymous use of the Internet takes a number of forms: anonymous browsing, anonymous publishing of content on the World Wide Web, anonymous e-mail messages and anonymous posting of messages to newsgroups. In accordance with the principle of freedom of expression and the right to privacy, use of anonymity is legal . Users may wish to access data and browse anonymously so that their personal details cannot be recorded and used without their knowledge. Content providers on the Internet may wish to remain anonymous for legitimate purposes, such as where a victim of a sexual offence or a person suffering from a dependency such as alcohol or drugs, a disease or a disability wishes to share experiences with others without revealing their identity, or where a person wishes to report a crime without fear of retaliation. A user should not be required to justify anonymous use. Anonymity may however also be used by those engaged in illegal acts to complicate the task of the police in identifying and apprehending the person responsible. Further examination is required of the conditions under which measures to identify criminals for law enforcement purposes can be achieved in the same way as in the "off-line" world. Precedents exist in laws establishing conditions and procedures for tapping and listening into telephone calls. Anonymity should not be used as a cloak to protect criminals. c) Technical Measures Filtering and rating Use of filtering and rating is a means whereby Internet users are enabled to select categories of content which they prefer to receive or do not wish to receive, and to set parameters for use by children for whom they are responsible. Use of such systems should be voluntary and a matter for individual choice. In particular, the PICS standard launched by the international World Wide Web consortium with EC support should be vigorously promoted as the means by which such ratings can be expressed and used to empower parental filtering of material. i. Content-providers should be encouraged to rate their documents. In order to bring about a rapid acceptance of filtering and rating, a wide coverage of sites should be obtained. This can most easily be achieved if content providers participate fully in the rating process. ii. The Commission should foster applied research especially into the development of third-party rating systems to meet different needs and take account of Europe's cultural and linguistic diversity. Rating carried out by independent third parties ensures a standard approach to content rating and deals with cases where the content provider fails to rate properly. Other benefits for users include rating systems which guarantee respect of their convictions or which deal with specific needs not met by the content provider's rating system. Privacy-enhancing and tracing technologies iii. The Commission should include improved privacy-enhancing and tracing mechanisms as a priority in its research programme, and results made available from existing programmes as soon as possible. Users should be given the possibility to make the most of the enormous potential of modern computing technology to protect their legitimate right to privacy, while still allowing law-enforcement authorities to carry out their duties. Research into methods of providing users with increased levels of discrimination and intelligent filtering will also be promoted as part of the natural evolution of filtering and rating system. Users should be given the possibility to screen out anonymous publishing on the World Wide Web and to refuse to receive anonymous e-mails. Newsgroups, whether actively moderated or not, should be able to declare a policy of refusal of anonymous messages. Technical progress is needed to be able to realise these objectives. Tracing technologies Since some anonymous services may continue to be offered in countries where legal traceability is not guaranteed, urgent steps should also be taken to improve means of identifying where and by whom illegal content is distributed. Attention should be paid to the process by which technical standards for digital communication are adopted since the design of such standards may affect the possibilities of law-enforcement bodies to track criminal activities. d) Further suggestions The following are suggestions of the group which are an essential complement to other measures proposed. i. Criminal law and criminal procedure and the penalties for offences should be appropriate Member States should examine carefully whether the rules in force are adequate to deal with illegal content transmitted by the Internet, in particular with respect to offences against children, and see how to ensure a more coherent treatment of child pornography in criminal law. The issue of liability for criminal content should be addressed (see above). ii. Member States should train and equip police and the courts to deal with illegal content and use of Internet for illegal purposes The international nature and technical features of the Internet mean that specialised training and equipment should be made available to help the police and the courts in their tasks. iii. Police should take advantage of advice and information from self-regulation bodies The police should use advice and information from self-regulation bodies. A single liaison point between police and self-regulators in each Member State should be set up. iv. Member States should examine how to improve co-operation between them in the context of the relevant areas of common interest set out in article K1 of the Treaty on European Union. e) International co-operation The proposals described above should be implemented not only within the European Union, but also internationally in an appropriate framework. This applies particularly to police and judicial co-operation and to dealing with liability for illegal content and anonymous use of Internet. Any international agreement should be in conformity with fundamental rights and European traditions of free expression. At the operational level, co-operation between hot-line operators and between operators of rating systems and shared research into filtering software and tracing systems should be promoted. f) Support measures Awareness and parental education Awareness activities should be encouraged so that users understand the opportunities as well as the drawbacks of the Internet. Parents and educators, in particular, should be sufficiently informed so as to be able to take full advantage of parental control software and rating systems. Industry, self-regulatory bodies and user groups could collaborate in providing suitable material, including explanations, illustrations and animation. This should be made available on the Internet and to other media who should be encouraged to produce articles or programmes aimed at the target groups of parents, educators and young Internet users. Web Site The Web site on illegal and harmful content should include: * Links to hot-lines and instructions on how and where to complain about illegal material * Advice to parents and teachers on how to use the Internet and filtering and rating (multi-lingual) * Links to filtering software and rating systems * Information from self-regulation bodies, industry codes of conduct The proposed Web site should contain content from a variety of sources so as to provide a platform and a meeting place for all concerned in combating illegal content and providing means for dealing with harmful content. It should include the possibility for feedback from users, and links to other sites with neutral and reliable information for consumers about the Internet. 5. Follow-up of the working party The Working Party considers that it has been extremely useful, even in the brief time available, to have met as a group including representatives of Member States, industry (network operators, hardware manufacturers, software suppliers, Internet service providers, content providers) and users. A platform with a representative group of all concerned should follow progress in implementing proposals and continue to discuss outstanding issues. Annex: List of participants ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Footnotes 1 Breach of copyright can also entail criminal sanctions 2 Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(96) 487 3 COM(96) 483 4 e-mail: meldpunt@xs4all.nl see also http://www.xs4all.nl/~meldpunt/ 5 http://www.anwalt.de/ictf/s961104e.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [ LAB Home ][ I*M Europe Home][ Help][ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) ][ Subject Index ][ Text Search] [ Discussion forums][ Feedback and queries][ Europa WWW server] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- =A9ECSC-EC-EAEC, Brussels-Luxembourg, 1996 webmaster@echo.lu ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1996 22:51:01 CST From: CuD Moderators Subject: File 3--Cu Digest Header Info (unchanged since 13 Dec, 1996) Cu-Digest is a weekly electronic journal/newsletter. Subscriptions are available at no cost electronically. CuD is available as a Usenet newsgroup: comp.society.cu-digest Or, to subscribe, send post with this in the "Subject:: line: SUBSCRIBE CU-DIGEST Send the message to: cu-digest-request@weber.ucsd.edu DO NOT SEND SUBSCRIPTIONS TO THE MODERATORS. The editors may be contacted by voice (815-753-0303), fax (815-753-6302) or U.S. mail at: Jim Thomas, Department of Sociology, NIU, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA. To UNSUB, send a one-line message: UNSUB CU-DIGEST Send it to CU-DIGEST-REQUEST@WEBER.UCSD.EDU (NOTE: The address you unsub must correspond to your From: line) Issues of CuD can also be found in the Usenet comp.society.cu-digest news group; on CompuServe in DL0 and DL4 of the IBMBBS SIG, DL1 of LAWSIG, and DL1 of TELECOM; on GEnie in the PF*NPC RT libraries and in the VIRUS/SECURITY library; from America Online in the PC Telecom forum under "computing newsletters;" On Delphi in the General Discussion database of the Internet SIG; on RIPCO BBS (312) 528-5020 (and via Ripco on internet); and on Rune Stone BBS (IIRGWHQ) (860)-585-9638. CuD is also available via Fidonet File Request from 1:11/70; unlisted nodes and points welcome. EUROPE: In BELGIUM: Virtual Access BBS: +32-69-844-019 (ringdown) In ITALY: ZERO! BBS: +39-11-6507540 In LUXEMBOURG: ComNet BBS: +352-466893 UNITED STATES: etext.archive.umich.edu (192.131.22.8) in /pub/CuD/CuD ftp.eff.org (192.88.144.4) in /pub/Publications/CuD/ aql.gatech.edu (128.61.10.53) in /pub/eff/cud/ world.std.com in /src/wuarchive/doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/ wuarchive.wustl.edu in /doc/EFF/Publications/CuD/ EUROPE: nic.funet.fi in pub/doc/CuD/CuD/ (Finland) ftp.warwick.ac.uk in pub/cud/ (United Kingdom) The most recent issues of CuD can be obtained from the Cu Digest WWW site at: URL: http://www.soci.niu.edu/~cudigest/ COMPUTER UNDERGROUND DIGEST is an open forum dedicated to sharing information among computerists and to the presentation and debate of diverse views. CuD material may be reprinted for non-profit as long as the source is cited. Authors hold a presumptive copyright, and they should be contacted for reprint permission. It is assumed that non-personal mail to the moderators may be reprinted unless otherwise specified. Readers are encouraged to submit reasoned articles relating to computer culture and communication. Articles are preferred to short responses. Please avoid quoting previous posts unless absolutely necessary. DISCLAIMER: The views represented herein do not necessarily represent the views of the moderators. Digest contributors assume all responsibility for ensuring that articles submitted do not violate copyright protections. ------------------------------ End of Computer Underground Digest #8.90 ************************************ X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X Another file downloaded from: & the Temple of the Screaming Electron NIRVANAnet(tm) HQ ! \ 510/935-5845 -$- -------- * Walnut Creek, CA ! . / /_\ /-o-\ Raw Data for Raw Nerves (o..) | * Information * Innuendo * Lies + |:| /^\ /~\ Thousands of text files * Multi-line Chat ! |:|/\ _| |____|:| Full access for first-time callers /^\ / O |/...\ /_-_\ |@ \_| @ /:::::|/|- : -| We don't want to know who you are, | | | /~ |/| _ | where you live, or what your phone number is |____|/~ @ /~\ |/|_(_)_| /_______|_|_|/ We are not Big Brother X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X