------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OD-90228 SUGGESTION "PRIDE"-IF
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JUN 16, 1997 RELEASE 1.2.0 PAGE 1
****************************************************************
* MI-10001 WIN32 API SUPPORT *
****************************************************************
REQUIRED DATE- OPEN USER PRIORITY WEIGHT- 50 RANKING- 0016
DATE RECEIVED- APR 16, 1997 REQUEST STANDING - REVIEW AS OF- JUN 16, 1997
TYPE- MOD/IMP
DESCRIPTION-
PRODUCT: OS/2 Warp 4 and OS/2 Warp Server
AREA: Base operating system
WHO: End-users concerned with productivity
Provide full Win32 support in the base operating system to
allow all Windows 95 and NT programs to execute on OS/2,
thereby making it the premier "integrating platform."
BUSINESS RATIONALE
A huge variety of high-quality general and special-purpose
Win32 apps would be available for OS/2 users. In most cases we
are already two generations behind Win95 users. Examples:
Microsoft Office (of course), EndNote+, @RISK, Claris
FileMaker, etc.
I seem to recall that Microsoft released their API as a standard
to meet government requirements to not have a closed system. It
should be obvious that OS/2's failure to support Windows NT and
95 software is a major negative mark against what is otherwise
a great product that offers a heck of a lot more value than does
NT. I would therefore like to see the next server and work
station release provide the ability to run Windows NT and 95
software.
It would be a good marketing option and fun, but not vital,
to offer a choice of presentation managers, including one
that looks like NT 4.0, and watch Microsoft complain about
"Look and Feel" issues. I am sure that Apple would be happy
to provide copies of whatever documents they have on had that
Microsoft filed against them.
ATTRIBUTES:
HIGH Value
Desired NEXT full release
BENEFIT$
1. Strategic marketing move by IBM to encourage new
users as in the days of WinOS2 support for Win 3.1 users.
2. End-users won't abandon OS/2 as their desktop OS when the
feature list of the Win32 aps get too good to pass up.
EDITOR'S NOTE: This request is based on multiple requests,
which have been merged due to commonality, from the following
contributors:
David Rossiter
Ithaca, NY, USA
dgr2@clarityconnect.com
Richard Bradley
P.O. Box 8386
Alexandria, VA 22306
USA
RickBradley@worldnet.att.net
Supplemental text:
My company would very much like to replace the 95/NT
environment, but we have those Win32 programs that large
number of people are using. With this support, a very
strong case can be made to bring in OS/2 as the standard
platform.
Tom Trifon
trifon@ibm.net
JUNE 1, 1997
Win32: Some thoughts:
a. Write a WPS add on to NT?
b. Start by replacing OS/2's components with Win32
compliant subsystems. One good place to start would
be with the network driver model. By making OS/2
compatible with NT's network driver model you can
achieve these benefits:
1. Happy hardware manufacturers - fewer drivers to
write.
2. Happy networked users since more likely to be
better driver support.
3. Publicity - embracing a standard
c. OS/2 mindshare - current model is old and 16 bit
(I believe) and many drivers are not compatible with
SMP, techno-geeks are not impressed.
Submitted by:
Oliver Wilcock
owcher@ibm.net
June 3, 1997
"Add FULL win32 API"
- Peter vd Berg
The Hague, Netherlands
Synetics
synetics@ibm.net
* * * END OF OUTPUT * * *
PLEASE SEND US YOUR COMMENTS! on the priority rankings or any of
the suggestions included; send e-mail to the Editor at: TimB1557@aol.com