The comba‰štwo fire-people žhighly combusble. Unls ir usims ‘directed toward Žsame objecv, y can sily burn ch or up. The usic fire-person ‡fe™sfled by Žcaus r–person. However, Žr-person can provide Žmuch needed balance to stabilize Žra ship. The usic fire-person žfed by Žtlectual idlm šŽair-person--which makm an excing pair who, untunaty, become oblivis to rlity. The fire-person's usim ’smulang acvity ‡too t˜be dsed by Žwater-person's emo al midity dire to avoid strsful situa s. The usic fire-person ‡fe™sfled by Žcaus r–person. However, Žr-person can provide Žmuch needed balance to stabilize Žra ship. The two ‘so praccal abt everyat y ‡fd little to dagree abt. In fact, y may ‹to seek or partners ’some smula . The r-person may not be too rilled abt Žair-person's tlectualiza‰over matters which must be obvis to any or person wi–some common sse. Bo–Žr-person Žwater-person ‘liky to sit wait ’Žor person to make Žfirst move •Žra ship--but at's Žway y like it. The usic fire-person žfed by Žtlectual idlm šŽair-person--which makm an excing pair who, untunaty, become oblivis to rlity. The r-person may not be too rilled abt Žair-person's tlectualiza‰over matters which must be obvis to any or person wi–some common sse. The two spd so much me airir brilliant ids to ch or y never seem to noce at neir šm hŸbght Žgroceri, paid Žbills, “tak˜t Žtrh. The logical argumts šŽair-person ‡rt˜Žemo al security šŽwater-person--neir one ‡understŽ"logic" šŽor one. The fire-person's usim ’smulang acvity ‡too t˜be dsed by Žwater-person's emo al midity dire to avoid strsful situa s. ˆža partnership štwo highly ssive people who can almost rd ch or's mds. It may wk t if ch one can make some allowance ’Žor's moods. Bo–Žr-person Žwater-person ‘liky to sit wait ’Žor person to make Žfirst move •Žra ship--but at's Žway y like it. The logical argumts šŽair-person ‡rt˜Žemo al security šŽwater-person--neir one ‡understŽ"logic" šŽor one. ˆtwosome can rlly make s happ--provided at bo–partners can ever agree on what it žat y wld like to ‹happ. The cardal-person's need ’ac‰may be frustrated by Žfixed-person's need ’mataŽstatus quo defity. A tt šir ability to comprome. The mutable-person's ns to adapt to follow Žld šŽcardal-person puts Žra ship directly •Žhs šŽcardal-person. The cardal-person's need ’ac‰may be frustrated by Žfixed-person's need ’mataŽstatus quo defity. A tt šir ability to comprome. Wi–se two people bo–set on keeps just Žway y , re ža good chance at ir ra ship ‡lt a long me, if it ever gets started. The mutable-person may fd it difficult to sasfy hž“her need ’variety wi–Žfixed-person's psion to keep s just Žway y . The two people ‘ch look’someone to take Žld •ir jot acvi. They shld limit msvto acvišŽmd alone. The mutable-person's ns to adapt to follow Žld šŽcardal-person puts Žra ship directly •Žhs šŽcardal-person. The mutable-person may fd it difficult to sasfy hž“her need ’variety wi–Žfixed-person's psion to keep s just Žway y . Œshld not ‹much trble •getng along wi–†„what differcyœ , yœshld be able to wk t. Œ‡‹to wk very hard to mata•a ra ship. The rson žat Ždomantly mcule person's aggrsive behavi“‡rt˜hars Žrerved, security-movated feme personality. Œsh‘Žsame viewpot approach to life. Inially žcld give yœa strong fešcompability. However, yœ‡soon fe™a need ’Žkd šsmula‰at comfrom defdmildly differt pots šview. Œ‡‹to turn to someone se to meet at need. Wi–se two, ch one lookt ’msv, neir one may pay much att‰to Žor one •žra ship. Not too much potal ’a close personal ra ship here, gh neir one may noce unl one rlizat Žor n't givm what y rlly want. Cld be useful ra ship on a buss “prsional lev™gh. There may be potal here ’se two, but it ‡be primarily wldly, fancial, material, sasfybically sf-ited personal s. ˆtype šra ship ‡probably be most useful •a buss “prsional type šra ship. The dividual persons sfh s may annoy irritate Žrave person, sce Žrave person žed •jot ra ships shar. ˆ‡strs limit žra ship. The rave person, if y ‘rlly ed •a ra ship may hp Ždividual person to rate better •ir ra ship overcome Žsfh sncts. The dividual may hp Žrave person lrn how to better get what y want t šŽwld Ÿwl. The spiritually ited termal person may fd Ždividual person's s frustrang un-spiritual, gh Žtermal person may wi–pace be able to op˜Ždividual person up to a stronger spiritual awns. The dividual person may fd Žtermal person too psive fatalc Ÿwl, may op˜Žtermal person up to a grter sf riance sf-servs. There may be potal here ’se two, but it ‡be primarily wldly, fancial, material, sasfybically sf-ited personal s. ˆtype šra ship ‡probably be most useful •a buss “prsional ra ship. The two ‡probably sh‘a strong ƒ•money mak, cers, polics, “or wldly “material s. ˆtype šra ship ‡probably be most useful •a buss “prsional ra ship. The tempal person ‡probably fd Žrave person ls ed •wldly affairs me ed •ra ships. The rave person may fd Žtempal person's s •wldly, material affairs, impersonal cold. The tempal person may be able to provide fancial security wl–at Žtermal person may not be ed •Žtermal may hp to op˜Žmaterially ed, tempal person up to me spiritual s. The dividual persons sfh s may annoy irritate Žrave person, sce Žrave person žed •jot ra ships shar. ˆ‡strs limit žra ship. The tempal person ‡probably fd Žrave person ls ed •wldly affairs me ed •ra ships. The rave person may fd Žtempal person's s •wldly, material affairs, impersonal cold. The two ‡probably spd a lot šir ergy eir rang to one anor “rang to or people. There žpotal here ’a strong ra ship. The two ‡need to watch to make sure y ‘rlly rang not just strokch or's ego. There may be potal here ’a close personal ra ship. Their ra ship may be ša me spiritual nature Ÿwl. The termal person may op˜Žbically people ited rave person to me spiritual rigis s. The spiritually ited termal person may fd Ždividual person's s frustrang un-spiritual, gh Žtermal person may wi–pace be able to op˜Ždividual person up to a stronger spiritual awns. The dividual person may fd Žtermal person too psive fatalc Ÿwl, may op˜Žtermal person up to a grter sf riance sf-servs. The two people may sh‘a strong ƒ•Žoccult, psychic phemonon, trology, rigion, “or spiritual s. They need to make sure y get back to Žrl wld, “y may never ‹a rl personal ra ship. The tempal person may be able to provide fancial security wl–at Žtermal person may not be ed •Žtermal may hp to op˜Žmaterially ed, tempal person up to me spiritual s. There may be potal here ’a close personal ra ship. Their ra ship may be ša me spiritual nature Ÿwl. ˆtwosome can rlly make s happ--provided at bo–partners can ever agree on what it žat y wld like to ‹happ. The angular-person's need ’ac‰may be frustrated by Žsuccedt-person's need ’mataŽstatus quo defity. A tt šir ability to comprome. The cadt-person's ns to adapt to follow Žld šŽangular-person puts Žra ship directly •Žhs šŽangular-person. The angular-person's need ’ac‰may be frustrated by Žsuccedt-person's need ’mataŽstatus quo defity. A tt šir ability to comprome. Wi–se two people bo–set on keeps just Žway y , re ža good chance at ir ra ship ‡lt a long me, if it ever gets started. The cadt-person may fd it difficult to sasfy hž“her need ’variety wi–Žsuccedt-person's psion to keep s just Žway y . The two people ‘ch look’someone to take Žld •ir jot acvi. They shld limit msvto acvišŽmd alone. The cadt-person's ns to adapt to follow Žld šŽangular-person puts Žra ship directly •Žhs šŽangular-person. The cadt-person may fd it difficult to sasfy hž“her need ’variety wi–Žsuccedt-person's psion to keep s just Žway y . The two may be perfectly happy, tucked away •ir private little hidway, provided ir s happ˜to be similar, gh y may ‹difficulty starng a ra ship sce y don't like to rch t meet people sce y fd dlwi–people difficult prefer to sck to msv. ˆmay be a difficult ra ship sce ŽN–person hŸdifficulty rcht dlwi–rl people's problems, ŽEt person žso depdt, stubbn. ˆ‡be a potal ra ship sce bo–ŽN–person Wt person ‘mutually ed •dlwi–people. There žpotal, gh ’ŽWt person to become too depdt on ŽN–person. ˆmay be a difficult ra ship sce ŽtgoS–person ‡td be t re lng at wdmills valiantly tryto save Žwld. The N–person gh žme ed •bealone protecng ir own privacy. ˆmay be a very strong, powerful ra ship provided se two can ever agree on any, can lrn to mutually terdepdt on ch or •a ra ship. The potal žat se two never be able to ry depd on ch or because šir need to be sf-sufficit sf-riant. ˆmay be a difficult ra ship sce ŽN–person hŸdifficulty rcht dlwi–rl people's problems, ŽEt person žso depdt, stubbn. The Et person ‡defity be ldžra ship. The Et person may fd ŽWt person frustrangly depdt recepve. The Wt person may be perfectly happy wi–žra ship, but ŽEt person may rt˜ir security wi–ir depdce strong ‡strong opions which may hurt ir fes. The Et S–people ‡probably be able to sh‘s •social caus, sf devopmt, gh y may ‹some difficulty •ma rl close personal ra ship, due to ŽEt's sf-sufficicy, depdce ŽS's impersonal ƒ•social caus. ˆmay devop to an addicve, mutually depdt ra ship which may not be hly ’eir šse two. The two may fd it difficult beapart from ch or. ˆ‡be a potal ra ship sce bo–ŽN–person Wt person ‘mutually ed •dlwi–people. There žpotal, gh ’ŽWt person to become too depdt on ŽN–person. ˆmay be a useful •a prsional ra ship “a ra ship gred to sf-devopmt such Ÿone wi–a psychologt. The Et person ‡defity be ldžra ship. The Et person may fd ŽWt person frustrangly depdt recepve. The Wt person may be perfectly happy wi–žra ship, but ŽEt person may rt˜ir security wi–ir depdce strong ‡strong opions which may hurt ir fes. ‚The Wt person may ‹difficulty •a ra ship betwe˜se two, due to ŽS–person's impersonalns, sce y ‘so depdt. The S–person may be able to hp ŽWt person wi–ir depdant needs. ‚The two ‡probably be happy lng at wdmills wkto change Žwld, sce y ‹jot s •social rem public caus. There ra ship may not be ša personal one gh sce se two ‘probably rar impersonal. ˆmay be a difficult ra ship sce Žtgos–person ‡td be t re lng at wdmills valiantly tryto save Žwld. The n–person gh žme ed •bealone protecng ir own privacy. The S–person ‡probably be too impersonal ’Žbically personal N–person. The Et S–people ‡probably be able to sh‘s •social caus, sf devopmt, gh y may ‹some difficulty •ma rl close personal ra ship, due to ŽEt's sf-sufficicy, depdce ŽS's impersonal ƒ•social caus. ˆ‡be a potal ra ship sce bo–ŽN–person Wt person ‘mutually ed •dlwi–people. There žpotal, gh ’ŽWt person to become too depdt on ŽN–person. ˆmay be a useful •a prsional ra ship “a ra ship gred to sf-devopmt such Ÿone wi–a psychologt.