By Michael Hagerty, President, MBUG Much has been written recently about the "high speed network (HSN)". The Vice President (and even the President) have endorsed the idea of a government-sponsored development effort to put this concept on-line. While this idea does have a lot of support in the computing community, there are detractors. The detractors include privacy advocates, those who are opposed to the expense, and those who want the entire network set up by private industry and run like the phone company was or cable TV franchises are now. That each of these groups will be lobbying hard is an indication of how important the issued is viewed. Since politicians are, by and large, wholely ignorant of advances in computer technology while you, our subscribers, are (or are becoming) more knowledgable, I want to point out where we are now vis-a-vis public data networks. I hope that an educated electorate would be able to educate our leaders so that wise choices can be made. In the last decade or so, the Department of Defense, through its research arm, funded the development of Internet. The purpose of this venture was to permit researchers at universities and government facilities to interact via an electronic mail system. Internet has been, I believe, much more successful than was originally anticipated. That universities and government researchers would be connected was expected. What was not anticipated was that Internet would take on a life of its own, independent of it original funders, and would connect companies, foreign governments and individuals from every walk of life. Let me digress by pointing out that Internet is really the system of interconnection, more or less the hardware and the supporting network software, and that Internet provides the mechanism of addresses, etc. One can, if someone's Internet address is known, send a message directly to that individual, regardless of where they may be. As to how, I prefer John Campbell's observation that, "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." To a large number of people, this is magic. Over the years, "gateways" have been introduced which connect Internet to other networks. It is possible, therefore, to send a message on one network to an individual on yet another network, just as you might call someone who has a phone serviced by Japan Telephone & Telegraph from a phone serviced by PacBell. The HSN is rather like Internet on steroids, much much faster and reaching many many more sites. Just having the network is rather like having a cable TV system with no stations or carried programs. Kinda like a computer with no software... It is the software which is "secret sauce" to make this HSN valuable. Most BBSs have message conferences, in which users are encouraged to engage in public discussion on particular topics. Many BBSs subscribe to networks (such as RIME, FidoNet or Ilink) so that a larger audience can participate in these discussions. A fairly large number of shareware authors take advantage of these networks to support their products in specialized "conferences" or "newsgroups". Commercial vendors (CompuServe, America On-line or Prodigy) do this same thing and may view the interconnection of networks into the HSN as detrimental to their continuing success. Each of these services is selling a public newspaper to which all of the posters represent their (paying) reporters. They may exercise control over content and have in the past become embroiled in vitriolic debates over perceived censorship. BBSs and the commercial vendors are beginning to take notice of Internet and its "newsgroups". There are some 10 million people connected via Internet and the Usenet newsgroups carried on it cover over 2,000 different subjects, including subjects as diverse as field hockey, aviation, beer-making, English usage, and virtually any computer, technical or scientific area of endeavor. Nitelog provides access to these newsgroups via Internet, as well as access to many newsgroups from other nets of interest to its subscribers. Where does this lead us? I see that in the very near future, we will have access to a specialized magazine, delivered to us electronically which will include only articles of particular interest to its reader. These articles will be drawn from a vast array of different sources and will include "books", multi-media presentations and, yes, raging debate. This will be the customized newspaper dreamt of in science fiction. We will also have access to materials on virtually any subject of interest to the individual. In our daily paper would be study materials, supplementary information, comics, entertainment, our personal mail, reports on our bank account and bills due and, of course, junk mail. The possibilities are only limited by the human imagination. That there will be a network to which we can connect is a certainty; the questions remaining to be answered concern the speed, security, privacy, access fees and content.