Archive-name: perl-faq/part0 Version: $Id: perl-intro,v 2.2 1994/11/07 18:05:12 spp Exp spp $ Posting-Frequency: bi-weekly Archive-name: perl-faq/part1 Version: $Id: part1,v 2.3 1994/11/07 18:05:23 spp Exp spp $ Posting-Frequency: bi-weekly This posting contains answers to general information and availability questions. The following questions are answered in this posting: 1.1) What is Perl? Perl is a compiled scripting language written by Larry Wall*. Here's the beginning of the description from the perl(1) man page: Perl is an interpreted language optimized for scanning arbi- trary text files, extracting information from those text files, and printing reports based on that information. It's also a good language for many system management tasks. The language is intended to be practical (easy to use, effi- cient, complete) rather than beautiful (tiny, elegant, minimal). It combines (in the author's opinion, anyway) some of the best features of C, sed, awk, and sh, so people familiar with those languages should have little difficulty with it. (Language historians will also note some vestiges of csh, Pascal, and even BASIC-PLUS.) Expression syntax corresponds quite closely to C expression syntax. Unlike most Unix utilities, perl does not arbitrarily limit the size of your data--if you've got the memory, perl can slurp in your whole file as a single string. Recursion is of unlimited depth. And the hash tables used by associative arrays grow as necessary to prevent degraded performance. Perl uses sophisticated pattern matching techniques to scan large amounts of data very quickly. Although optimized for scanning text, perl can also deal with binary data, and can make dbm files look like associative arrays (where dbm is available). Setuid perl scripts are safer than C programs through a dataflow tracing mechanism which prevents many stupid security holes. If you have a problem that would ordinarily use sed or awk or sh, but it exceeds their capa- bilities or must run a little faster, and you don't want to write the silly thing in C, then perl may be for you. There are also translators to turn your sed and awk scripts into perl scripts. OK, enough hype. 1.2) What are perl4 and perl5, are there any differences? Perl4 and perl5 are different versions of the language. Perl4 was the previous release, and perl5 is "Perl: The Next Generation." Perl5 is, essentially, a complete rewrite of the perl source code from the ground up. It has been modularized, object oriented, tweaked, trimmed, and optimized until it almost doesn't look like the old code. However, the interface is mostly the same, and compatibility with previous releases is very high. 1.3) What features does perl5 provide over perl4? If you get the newest source (from any of the main FTP sites), you will find a directory full of man pages (possibly to be installed as section 1p and 3pm) that discuss the differences, new features, old incompatibilies and much more. Here, however, are some highlights as to the new feature and old incompatibilites. * Enhanced Usability: Perl code can now be written in a much more legible style. Regular expressions have been enhanced to allow minimal matches, conditionals, and much more. Cryptic variable names (although still supported) have been aliased to new nmemonics, using the "English" module, allowing old scripts to run and new scripts to be readable. Error messages and optional warnings are more informative and will catch many common mistakes. See the perldiag(1) man page, which contains pithy prose from Larry Wall* on each and every possible muttering perl might spout at you. * Simplified Grammar: The new yacc grammar is one half the size of the old one. Many of the arbitrary grammer rules have been regularized. The number of reserved words has been cut by 2/3. * Lexical Scoping: Perl variables may now be declared within a lexical scope, similar to C's "auto" variables. This is a great improvement on efficiency and contributes to better privacy. See the my() entry in perlfunc(1). * Arbitrarily nested data structures: Full fledged multidimensional arrays. Any scalar value, including an array element, may now contain a reference to any other variable or subroutine. Easily created anonymous variables and subroutines. See perlref(1). * Modularity and Reusability: The Perl library is now defined in terms of modules which can be easily shared among various packages. Packages can import any or all of a module's published interface. See perlmod(1), perlsub(1), and Exporter(3pm). * Object-oriented programming: A package can function as a class. Dynamic multiple inheritance and virtual methods are supported in a straight-forward manner with little new syntax. Filehandles are now treated as objects. See perlobj(1), perlmod(1), and FileHandle(3pm). * Embeddible and Extensible: Perl can be easily embedded in C/C++ approlications, and can either call or be called by your routines through a documented interface. The XS preprocessor is provided to make it easy to glue your C/C++ routines into Perl. Dynamic loading of modules is supported. See perlapi(1), perlcall(1), and DynaLoader(3pm). * POSIX compliant: A major new module is the POSIX module, which provides access to all available POSIX routines and definitions. Seee POSIX(3pm). * Package constructors and destructors: The new BEGIN and END blocks provide means to capture control as a package is being compiled and after the program exits. As a degenerate case, they work just like awk's BEGIN and END when you use the -p or -n switches. See perlmod(1). * Multiple simultaneous DBM implementations: A perl program now has access to DBM, NDBM, SDBM, GDBM and Berkeley DB files in the same script. The dbmopen interface has been generalized to allow any variable to be tied to an object class which defines its access methods. tie/untie now preferable to dbmopen/dbmclose. See the tie() entry in perlfunc(1) and the DB_File(3pm) man pages. * Subroutine definitions may now be autoloaded: The AUTOLOAD mechanism allows any arbitrary semantics to undefined subroutine calls. See the section on Autoloading in the perlsub(1) manpage. * Regular Expression Enhancements: Qualifiers may be followed by a "?" to signify that they should be non-greedy. A "?" directly after an opening paren indicates non backreference grouping and the next character determines the purpose of the match (?:a|b|c) will match any of a b or c without producing a backreference, (?=stuff) does a non-eating look ahead to assure that the next thing is stuff, (?!nonsense) looks ahead to assure that the next thing must not be "nonsense". Embedded whitespace and comments for readability. A consistent extensibility mechanism has been added that is upwardly compatible with all old regexps. Variables may now be interpoled literally into a pattern with \Q or the quotemeta fuction, which works like \U but backwhacks non-alphanumerics. New m and s "flags" for pattern matching force multi- or single-line matching. The "s" makes "." match "\n". \A and \Z anchor matches to the beginning and end of a string and ignore multiline semantics. \G matches where the previous m//g or s///g left off. * The -w (warnings) switch is much more informative. * References and Objects (see t/op/ref.t) for examples. * => is a synonum for comma and helps group paired arguments, such as initializers for associative arrays and named arguments to subroutines. * All functions, even predeclared subroutines, are treated as list operators or unary operators. Parens are optional. * Flattened interpreter: Compare perl4's eval.c with perl5's pp.c. Compare perl4's 900 line interpreter look with perl5's one line. * eval is now treated like a subroutine call, meaning (among other things) you can return from it. * format value lists may be spread over multiple lines with a do {} block. * flags on the #! line are interpreted even if the script wasn't invoked directly. * ?: is now an lvalue. * list context now propogates to the right side of && and ||, and as the 2nd and 3rd arguments of ?: * preferred package delimeter now :: rather than '. * new "and" and "or" operators, like && and || but with a lower precedence than comma, so they work better with list operators. * New functions abs(), chr(), uc(), ucfirst(), lc(), and lcfirst() * require(number) checks to see that the version is at least that version * qw//, which is equivalent to split(' ', q//) * assignment of a reference to a glob replaces the single element of the glob corresponding to the reference type: *foo = \$bar, * foo = \&bletch; * filehandle methods are supported: output_autoflush STDOUT 1; * Autoload stubs can now call the replacement subroutine with goto &realsub. * Subroutines can be defined lazily in any package by declaring an AUTOLOAD routine, which will be called if a non-existant subroutine is called in that package. * "use" and "no" subsume many feautres. "use Module LIST" is short for "BEGIN { require Module; import Module LIST }" "no" is identical, except that it calls "unimport" instead. "use integer" and variations of "use strict [vars,refs,subs]" were implemented through new modules. (Thanks to Tom Christiansen* for this section) 1.4) Where can I get docs on perl5? The complete perl documentation is available with the Perl distribution, or can be accessed from the following sites. Note that the PerlDoc ps file is 240 pages long!! http://www.metronet.com/0/perlinfo/perl5/manual/perl.html ftp://ftp.uu.net/languages/perl/PerlDoc.ps.gz ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu/pub/gnu/PerlDoc.ps.gz ftp://ftp.cbi.tamucc.edu/pub/duff/Perl/PerlDoc.ps.gz ftp://www.metronet.com/pub/perlinfo/perl5/manual/PerlDoc.ps.gz http://web.nexor.co.uk/perl/perl.html (Europe) ftp://ftp.zrz.tu-berlin.de/pub/unix/perl/PerlDoc.ps.gz (Europe) ftp://ftp.cs.ruu.nl/pub/PERL/perl5.0/PerlDoc.ps.gz (Europe) ftp://sungear.mame.mu.oz.au/pub/perl/doc/PerlDoc.ps.gz (Oz) 1.5) Will perl5 break my perl4 scripts? In general, no. However, certain bad old practices have become highly frowned upon. The following are the most important of the known incompatibilies between perl4 and perl5. See perltrap(1) for more details. * "@" ***ALWAYS*** interpolate in double quoted strings. Non- array "@"s must be escaped: Mail("foo@bar.com") needs to be Mail("foo\@bar.com"); The compiler catches this. * "open FILE || die" needs to be "open(FILE) || die". The compiler forgives you for this, but won't stop complaining until you fix it. * Barewords are no longer (necessarily) strings: they will actually call the function (if it existed when that code was compiled) instead of returning a string of that value. Check your signal handlers. The 'use strict subs' pragma (see strict(3pm)) will help you with this. * "shift @x + 20" needs to be "shift(@x) + 20" because of precedence, and likewise "$y = scalar keys %foo + 30" needs to be instead "$y = scalar keys(%foo) + 30". * The internal symbol table is called %{PACKAGE::} for any given package. It used to be %{_PACKAGE}. * You may no longer (attempt to) write to read-only variables, like $1, or assign to a substr() past the end of a string. * Various deprecated practices elicit warning messages. 1.6) When will Perl stabilize? When asked at what point the Perl code would be frozen, Larry answere: Part of the redesign of Perl is to *allow* us to more or less freeze the language itself. It won't totally freeze, of course, but I think the rate of change of the core of the language is asymptotically approaching 0. In fact, as time goes on, now that we have an official extension mechanism, some of the things that are currently in the core of the language may move out (transparently) as extensions. This has already happened to dbmopen(). I've also been continuously reminding myself of what Henry Spencer calls "second system syndrome", in which everything under the sun gets added, resulting in a colossal kludge, like OS 360. You'll find that the new features in Perl 5 are all pretty minimalistic. The object-oriented features in particular added only one new piece of syntax, a C++-style method call. : The whole idea : Perl is to be a fast text-processing, system-maintenance, zero- startup : time language. If it gets to be so large and complicated that it isn't : fast-running and easy to use, it won't be to anyone's benefit. My motto from the start has been, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." I've been trying very hard not to remove those features from Perl that make it what it is. At the same time, a lot of streamlining has gone into the syntax. The new yacc file is about half the size of the old one, and the number of official reserved words has been cut by 2/3. All built-in functions have been unified (dualified?) as either list operators or unary operators. : I really like a lot of the features in Perl, but in order for Perl to : be useful on a long term basis, those features have to stay put. I : bought the Camel book less than a year ago and it sounds like within : another year it will be obsolete. The parts of Perl that the Camel book covers have not changed all that much. Most old scripts still run. Many scripts from Perl version 1.0 still run. We'll certainly be revising the Camel, but the new man pages are split up such that it's pretty easy to ferret out the new info when you want it. We did break a few misfeatures in going to Perl 5. It seemed like the first and last chance to do so. There's a list of the incompatibilities in the documentation. : Not only is it a lot of work to recompile Perl : on 20+ machines periodically, but it's hard to write scripts that are : useful in the long term if the guts of the language keep changing. : (And if I keep having to buy new books. I keep hearing about new : features of Perl 5 that aren't documented in any of the perl 5 : documentation that *I* can find.) I think you'll find a lot of folks who think that 4.036 has been a pretty stable platform. Perl 5 is a special case. I've been working on it for years. (This is part of the reason 4.036 has been so stable!) There are many changes, most of them for the better, I hope. I don't expect the transition to be without pain. But that's why I stuck numbered versions out in your bin directory, so that you can upgrade piecemeal if you like. And that's why I made the -w switch warn about many of the incompatibilities. And overriding all that, I've tried to keep it so that you don't have to know much about the new stuff to use the old stuff. You can upgrade your *knowledge* piecemeal too. The extension mechanism is designed to take over most of the evolutionary role from now on. And it's set up so that, if you don't have a particular extension, you know it right up at the front. : Are there any plans to write a Perl compiler? While interpreted Perl : is great for many applications, it would also be cool to be able to : precompile many scripts. (Yes, I know you can undump things, but : undump isn't provided with Perl and I haven't found a copy.) The : creation of a perl library and dynamically-loadable modules seems : like a step in that direction. Yes, part of the design of Perl 5 was to make it *possible* to write a compiler for it. It could even be done as an extension module, I suppose. Anyone looking for a master's thesis topic? In summary, almost every concern that you might think of has already been (at least) thought about. In a perfect world, every concern could be addressed perfectly. But in this world we just have to slog through. 1.7) What's the difference between "perl" and "Perl"? 32! [ ord('p') - ord('P') ] (Shouldn't that be 42, the Answer to the Great Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything? ;) Larry now uses "Perl" to signify the language proper and "perl" the implementation of it, i.e. the current interpreter. Hence Tom's quip that "Nothing but perl can parse Perl." On the other hand, the aesthetic value of casewise parallelism in "awk", "sed", and "perl" as much require the lower-case version as "C", "Pascal", and "Perl" require the upper-case version. It's also easier to type "Perl" in typeset print than to be constantly switching in Courier. :-) In other words, it doesn't matter much, especially if all you're doing is hearing someone talk about the language; case is hard to distinguish aurally. 1.8) Is it a perl program or a perl script? It depends on whether you are talking about the perl binary or something that you wrote using perl. And, actually, even this isn't necessarily true. "Standard" UNIX terminology is (roughly) this: programs are compiled into machine code once and run multiple times, scripts are translated (by a program) each time they are used. However, some say that a program is anything written which is executed on a computer system. Larry considers it a program if it is set in stone and you can't change it, whereas if you can go in and hack at it, it's a script. Of course, if you have the source code, that makes just about anything a script. ;) In general, it probably doesn't really matter. The terms are used interchangeably. If you particularly like one or the other, use it. If you want to call yourself a perl programmer, call them programs. If you want to call yourself a perl scripter, call them scripts. Randal* and I (at least) will call them hacks. (See question 2.10 ;) 1.9) Is perl difficult to learn? Not at all. Many people find Perl extremely easy to learn. There are at least three main reasons for this. The first reason is that most of Perl has been derived from standard utilities, tools, and languages that you are (probably) already familiar with. If you have any knowledge of the C programming language and standard C library, the Unix Shell, sed and awk, Perl should be simple and fun for you to learn. The second reason that Perl is easy to learn is that you only have to know a very small subset of Perl to be able to get useful results. In fact, once you can master #!/usr/local/bin/perl úÿ print "Hello, world\n"; you can start writing Perl scripts. In fact, you will probably never have to (or be able to) know everything about Perl. As you feel the need or desire to use more sophisticated features (such as C structures or networking), you can learn these as you go. The learning curve for Perl is not a steep one, especially if you have the headstart of having a background in UNIX. Rather, its learning curve is gentle and gradual, but it *is* admittedly rather long. The third reason is that you can get immediate results from your scripts. Unlike a normal compiled language (like C or Pascal, for example), you don't have to continually recompile your program every time you change one little thing. Perl allows you to experiment and test/debug quickly and easily. This ease of experimentation flattens the learning curve even more. If you don't know C or UNIX at all, it'll be a steeper learning curve, but what you then learn from Perl will carry over into other areas, like using the C library, UNIX system calls, regular expressions, and associative arrays, just to name a few. To know Perl is to know UNIX, and vice versa. 1.10) Should I program everything in Perl? Most definitely. In fact, you should delete the binaries for sed, awk, cc, gcc, grep, rm, ls, cat... well, just delete your /bin directory. But seriously, of course you shouldn't. As with any job, you should use the appropriate tool for the task at hand. Just because a hammer will put screws into a piece of board, you probably don't want to do that. While it's true that the answer to the question "Can I do (some arbitrary task) in Perl?" is almost always "yes", that doesn't mean this is necessarily a good thing to do. For many people, Perl serves as a great replacement for shell programming. For a few people, it also serves as a replacement for most of what they'd do in C. But for some things, Perl just isn't the optimal choice, such as tasks requiring very complex data structures. 1.11) How does Perl compare with other scripting languages, like Tcl, Python or REXX? REXX is an interpreted programming language first seen on IBM systems. Python is an interpreted programming language by Guido van Rossum*. TCL is John Ousterhout*'s embeddable command language, designed just for embedded command extensions, but lately used for larger applications. TCL's most intriguing feature for many people is the tcl/tk toolset that allows for interpreted X-based tools. Others use it for its "expect" extension. To avoid any flamage, if you really want to know the answer to this question, probably the best thing to do is try to write equivalent code to do a set of tasks. All three have their own newsgroups in which you can learn about (but hopefully not argue about) these languages. To find out more about these or other languages, you might also check out David Muir Sharnoff*'s posting "Catalog of Compilers, Interpreters, and Other Language Tools" which he posts to comp.lang.misc, comp.sources.d, comp.archives.admin, and news.answers newsgroups. It's a comprehensive treatment of many different languages. (Caveat lector: he considers Perl's syntax "unappealing".) 1.12) How can I get Perl over the Internet? Perl is available from any comp.sources.misc archive. You can use an archie server (see the alt.sources FAQ in news.answers) to find these if you want. Volume Issues Patchlevel and Notes ------ ------ ------------------------------------------------ 18 19-54 Patchlevel 3, Initial posting. 20 56-62 Patches 4-10 Since 1993, a number of archives have sprung up specifically for Perl and Perl related items. Larry maintains the official distribution site (for both perl4.036 and perl5) at netlabs. Probably the largest archive is at the University of Florida. In order of probability these sites will have the sources. Site IP Directory and notes ----------- ------- ------------------------------- North America: ftp.netlabs.com 192.94.48.152 /pub/outgoing/perl[VERSION]/ ftp.cis.ufl.edu 128.227.100.198 /pub/perl/src/[VERSION]/ prep.ai.mit.edu 18.71.0.38 /pub/gnu/perl5.000.tar.gz ftp.uu.net 192.48.96.9 /languages/perl/perl5.000.tar.gz ftp.khoros.unm.edu 198.59.155.28 /pub/perl/perl5.000.tar.gz ftp.cbi.tamucc.edu 165.95.1.3 /pub/duff/Perl/perl5.000.tar.gz ftp.metronet.com 192.245.137.1 /pub/perl/sources/ genetics.upenn.edu 128.91.200.37 /perl5/perl5_000.zip Europe: ftp.cs.ruu.nl 131.211.80.17 /pub/PERL/perl5.0/perl5.000.tar.gz ftp.funet.fi 128.214.248.6 /pub/languages/perl/ports/perl5/perl5.000.tar.gz ftp.zrz.tu-berlin.de 130.149.4.40 /pub/unix/perl/perl5.000.tar.gz src.doc.ic.ac.uk 146.169.17.5 /packages/perl5/perl5.000.tar.gz Australia: sungear.mame.mu.oz.au 128.250.209.2 /pub/perl/src/5.0/perl5.000.tar.gz If there is a site in Asia or Japan, please tell us about it. Thanks! You can also retrieve perl via non-ftp methods: http: //src.doc.ic.ac.uk/packages/perl5/perl5.000.tar.gz gopher: //src.doc.ic.ac.uk/0/packages/perl5/perl5.000.tar.gz 1.13) How can I get Perl via Email? The following is a list of known ftpmail sites. Please attempt to use the site closest to you with the ftp archive closest to it. Many of these sites already have perl on them. For information on how to use one of these sites, send email containing the word "help" to the address. United States: Massachusetts: ftpmail@decwrl.dec.com New Jersey: bitftp@pucc.princeton.edu North Carolina: ftpmail@sunsite.unc.edu Europe/UK: Germany: ftpmail@ftp.uni-stuttgart.de bitftp@vx.gmd.de UK: ftpmail@doc.ic.ac.uk Australia: ftpmail@cs.uow.edu.au Henk P Penning* suggests that if you are in Europe you should try the following (if you are in Germany or the UK, you should probably use one of the servers listed above): Email: Send a message to 'mail-server@cs.ruu.nl' containing: begin path your_email_address send help send PERL/INDEX end The path-line may be omitted if your message contains a normal From:-line. You will receive a help-file and an index of the directory that contains the Perl stuff. If all else fails, mail to Larry usually suffices. 1.14) How can I get Perl via UUCP? There currently is no way of getting Perl via UUCP. If anyone knows of a way, please contact me. The OSU site has discontinued the service. 1.15) Are there other ways of getting perl? Another possibility is to use UUNET, although they charge you for it. You have been duly warned. Here's the advertisement: Anonymous Access to UUNET's Source Archives 1-900-GOT-SRCS UUNET now provides access to its extensive collection of UNIX related sources to non- subscribers. By calling 1-900-468-7727 and using the login "uucp" with no password, anyone may uucp any of UUNET's on line source collection. Callers will be charged 40 cents per minute. The charges will appear on their next tele- phone bill. The file uunet!/info/help contains instructions. The file uunet!/index//ls-lR.Z contains a complete list of the files available and is updated daily. Files ending in Z need to be uncompressed before being used. The file uunet!~/compress.tar is a tar archive containing the C sources for the uncompress program. This service provides a cost effective way of obtaining current releases of sources without having to maintain accounts with UUNET or some other service. All modems connected to the 900 number are Telebit T2500 modems. These modems support all standard modem speeds including PEP, V.32 (9600), V.22bis (2400), Bell 212a (1200), and Bell 103 (300). Using PEP or V.32, a 1.5 megabyte file such as the GNU C compiler would cost $10 in con- nect charges. The entire 55 megabyte X Window system V11 R4 would cost only $370 in connect time. These costs are less than the official tape distribution fees and they are available now via modem. UUNET Communications Services 3110 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 570 Falls Church, VA 22042 +1 703 876 5050 (voice) +1 703 876 5059 (fax) info@uunet.uu.net 1.16) Has perl been ported to machine FOO? Perl runs on virtually all Unix machines simply by following the hints file and instructions in the Configure script. This auto- configuration script allows Perl to compile on a wide variety of platforms by modifying the machine specific parts of the code. For most Unix systems, or VMS systems for v5 perl, no porting is required. Try to compile Perl on your machine. If you have problems, examine the README file carefully. If all else fails, send a message to comp.lang.perl and crosspost to comp.sys.[whatever], there's probably someone out there that has already solved your problem and will be able to help you out. Perl has been ported to many non-Unix systems, although currently there are no v5 ports. All of the following are mirrored at ftp.cis.ufl.edu:/pub/perl/src/[OS]/. The following are the (known) official distribution points. Please contact the porters directly (when possible) in case of questions on these ports. * MS-DOS binaries and source are available at ftp.ee.umanitoba.ca [130.179.8.47] in /pub/msdos/perl There are currently half a dozen different ports for MS-DOS. BigPerl4 (v3) is perl4.036 compiled with the Watcom C/386 compiler (32-bit, flat-memory model C compiler) with the following features: * Up to 32MB of memory can be used. * Supports virtual memory. * Works under Windows 3.1 (however, a second copy of perl cannot be spawned under Windows). * The perl debugger can be used. * Contains GDBM support. * Windows/NT binaries are available from ftp.cis.ufl.edu. Does anyone know the official distribution point? I got these from archive.cis.ohio-state.edu quite awhile back. * Machintosh binaries and source are available from nic.switch.ch [130.59.1.40] in /software/mac/perl. Version 4.1.3 is perl4.036 compiled with the MPW C compiler * Mac_Perl_413_src.sit.bin Sources * Mac_Perl_413_tool.sit.bin MPW Tool * Mac_Perl_413_appl.sit.bin Standalone Application There is a mailing list for discussing Macintosh Perl. Contact "mpw-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch". Timothy Murphy* also ported a version of perl to the Macintosh using Think C. It has probably been abandoned in favour of the MPW port, but is still available at ftp.maths.tcd.ie [134.266.81.10] in the directory /pub/Mac/perl-4.035/. * OS/2 sources are also available at ftp.cis.ufl.edu in /pub/perl/src/os2. This appears to have been abandoned and added to the official distribution. See the directory os2 in the perl5 sources. * VMS systems should be able to build directly from the standard distribution. 1.17) How do I get Perl to compile on Solaris? The following directions are for perl, version 4. Perl, version 5, should compile more easily. If not, send mail to The Perl Porters Mailing List (perl5-porters@isu.edu) John Lees* reports: I have built perl on Solaris 2.1, 2.2 beta, and 2.2 FCS. Take /usr/ucb out of your path and do not use any BSD/UCB libraries. Only -lsocket, -lnsl, and -lm are needed. You can use the hint for Solaris 2.0, but the one for 2.1 is wrong. Do not use vfork. Do not use -I/usr/ucbinclude. The result works fine for me, but of couse does not support a couple of BSDism's. Casper H.S. Dik* reports You must remove all the references to /usr/ucblib AND /usr/ucbinclude. And ignore the Solaris_2.1 hints. They are wrong. The undefining of vfork() probably has to do with the confusion it gives to the compilers. If you use cc, you mustn't compile util.c/tutil.c with -O. I only used the following libs: -lsocket -lnsl -lm (there is a problem with -lmalloc) Michael D'Errico* reports: If you are using Solaris 2.x, the signal handling is broken. If you set up a signal handler such as 'ripper' it will be forgotten after the first time the signal is caught. To fix this, you need to recompile Perl. Just add '#define signal(x,y) sigset((x),(y))' after the '#include ' directive in each file that it occurs, then make it again. 1.18) How do I get Perl to compile on a Next? According to Andreas Koenig*, under NeXTstep 3.2, both perl4.036 and perl5.000 compile with the supplied hints file. However, Bill Eldridge* provides this message to help get perl4.036 on NeXTstep 3.0 to work: To get perl to compile on NeXTs, you need to combine the ANSI and BSD headers: cd /usr/include mkdir ansibsd cd ansibsd ln -s ../ansi ln -s ../bsd Then, follow the configuration instructions for NeXTs, *replacing* all mention of -I/usr/include/ansi or -I/usr/include/bsd with -I/usr/include/ansibsd. 1.19) What extensions are available from Perl and where can I get them? Some of the more popular extensions include those for windowing, graphics, or data base work. See perlmod(1). Tk (as in tcl/tk, but sans tcl) ftp://ftp.cis.ufl.edu/pub/perl/src/tkperl/tkperl5a5.tar.gz ftp://ftp.khoros.unm.edu/pub/perl/extensions/tkperl5a5.tar.gz ftp://ftp.metronet.com/pub/perlinfo/perl5/tkperl/tkperl5a5.tar.gz ftp://ftp.cs.ruu.nl/pub/PERL/perl5.0/tkperl5a5.tar.gz ftp://black.ox.ac.uk/src/ALPHA/tkperl5a5.tar.gz Curses (standard C library) ftp://ftp.ncsu.edu/pub/math/wsetzer/cursperl5a6.tar.gz ftp://ftp.metronet.com/pub/perlinfo/perl5/cursperl5a6.tar.gz ftp://ftp.cs.ruu.nl/pub/PERL/perl5.0/cursperl5a6.tar.gz Msql (SQL) ftp://ftp.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE/pub/unix/perl/MsqlPerl-a1.tgz ftp://ftp.khoros.unm.edu/pub/perl/extensions/MsqlPerl-a1.tgz ftp://ftp.metronet.com/pub/perlinfo/perl5/MsqlPerl5-a1.tgz ftp://ftp.cs.ruu.nl/pub/PERL/perl5.0/MsqlPerl-a1.tar.gz Sx (Athena & Xlib) ftp://ftp.pasteur.fr/pub/Perl/Sx.tar.gz ftp://ftp.khoros.unm.edu/pub/perl/extensions/Sx.tar.gz ftp://ftp.metronet.com/pub/perlinfo/perl5/Sx.tar.gz ftp://ftp.cs.ruu.nl/pub/PERL/perl5.0/PerlDoc.ps.gz 1.20) What is dbperl and where can I get it? Many database-oriented extensions to Perl have been written. Basically, these use the usub mechanism (see the usub/ subdirectory) in the source distribution) to link in a database library, allowing embedded calls to Informix, Ingres, Interbase, Oracle and Sybase. Here are the authors of the various extensions: What Target DB Who -------- ----------- ----------------------------------- ----- ?Infoperl Informix Kurt Andersen (kurt@hpsdid.sdd.hp.com) Ingperl Ingres Tim Bunce (timbo@ig.co.uk) and Ted Lemon Interperl Interbase Buzz Moschetti (buzz@bear.com) Isqlperl Informix William Hails, bill@tardis.co.uk Oraperl Oracle Kevin Stock (kstock@Auspex.com) Pgperl Postgres Igor Metz (metz@iam.unibe.ch) *Sqlperl Ingres Ted Lemon (mellon@ncd.com) Sybperl Sybase Michael Peppler (mpeppler@itf.ch) Uniperl Unify 5.0 Rick Wargo (rickers@coe.drexel.edu) ? Does this one still exist? * Sqlperl appears to have been subsumed by Ingperl Buzz Moschetti* has organized a project to create a higher level interface to will allow you to write your queries in a database- independent fashion. If this type of project interests you, send mail to and asked to be placed on the "perldb-interest" mailing lists. Here's a bit of advertising from Buzz: Perl is an interpreted language with powerful string, scalar, and array processing features developed by Larry Wall that "nicely bridges the functionality gap between sh(1) and C." Since relational DB operations are typically textually oriented, perl is particularly well-suited to manage the data flows. The C source code, which is available free of charge and runs on many platforms, contains a user-defined function entry point that permits a developer to extend the basic function set of the language. The DBperl Group seeks to exploit this capability by creating a standardized set of perl function extensions (e.g. db_fetch(), db_attach()) based the SQL model for manipulating a relational DB, thus providing a portable perl interface to a variety of popular RDMS engines including Sybase, Oracle, Ingres, Informix, and Interbase. In theory, any DB engine that implements a dynamic SQL interpreter in its HLI can be bolted onto the perl front end with predicatable results, although at this time backends exist only for the aforementioned five DB engines. The official archive for DBperl extensions is ftp.demon.co.uk: /pub/perl/db. It's the home of the evolving DBperl API Specification. Here's an extract from the updated README there: DBI/ The home of the DBI archive. To join the DBI mailing list send your request to perldb-interest-REQUEST@vix.com úÿ DBD/ Database Drivers for the DBI ... Oracle/ By Tim Bunce (not yet ready!) Ingres/ By Tim Bunce (not yet started!) mod/ Other Perl 5 Modules and Extensions ... Sybperl/ By Michael Peppler, mpeppler@itf.ch perl4/ Perl 4 extensions (using the usub C interface) oraperl/ ORACLE 6 & 7 By Kevin Stock (sadly no longer on the net) sybperl/ SYBASE 4 By Michael Peppler, mpeppler@itf.ch ingperl/ INGRES By Tim Bunce timbo@ig.co.uk and Ted Lemon isqlperl/ INFORMIX By William Hails, bill@tardis.co.uk interperl/ INTERBASE By Buzz Moschetti, buzz@bear.com oraperl/ ORACLE 6 & 7 By Kevin Stock (sadly no longer on the net) sybperl/ SYBASE 4 By Michael Peppler, mpeppler@itf.ch ingperl/ INGRES By Tim Bunce timbo@ig.co.uk and Ted Lemon isqlperl/ INFORMIX By William Hails, bill@tardis.co.uk interperl/ INTERBASE By Buzz Moschetti, buzz@bear.com uniperl/ UNIFY 5.0 By Rick Wargo, rickers@coe.drexel.edu pgperl/ POSTGRES By Igor Metz, metz@iam.unibe.ch btreeperl/ NDBM perl extensions. By John Conover, john@johncon.com ctreeperl/ C-Tree perl extensions. By John Conover, john@johncon.com duaperl/ X.500 Directory User Agent. By Eric Douglas. scripts/ Perl and shell scripts rdb/ RDB is a perl RDBMS for ASCII files. By Walt Hobbs, hobbs@rand.org shql/ SHQL is an interactive SQL database engine. Written as a shell script, SHQL interprets SQL commands and manipulates flat files based on those commands. By Bruce Momjian, root@candle.uucp xbase/ Perl scripts for accessing xBase style files (dBase III) refinfo/ Reference information sqlsyntax/ Yacc and lex syntax and C source code for SQL1 and SQL2 from ftp.uu.net:/pub/uunet/published/oreilly/nutshell/yacclex, and a draft SQL3 syntax from Jeff Fried + formats/ Details of file formats such as Lotus 1-2-3 .WK1 There are also a number of non SQL database interfaces for perl available from ftp.demon.co.uk. These include: Directory Target System Authors and notes --------- ------------- ------------------------------------------- btreeperl NDBM extension John Conover (john@johncon.com) ctreeperl CTree extension John Conover (john@johncon.com) duaperl X.500 DUA Eric Douglas rdb RDBMS Walt Hobbs (hobbs@rand.org) shql SQL Engine Bruce Momjian (root@candle.uucp) 1.21) Which DBM should I use? As shipped, Perl (version 5) comes with interfaces for several DBM packages (SDBM, old DBM, NDBM, GDBM, Berkeley DBM) that are not supplied but either come with your system are readily accessible via FTP. SDBM is guaranteed to be there. For a comparison, see AnyDBM_File(3pm) and DB_File(3pm). 1.22) Is there an SNMP aware Perl? snmperl was written by Guy Streeter (streeter@ingr.com), and was posted in late February 1993 to comp.protocols.snmp. It can be found archived at one of two (known) places: Host liasun3.epfl.ch Location: /pub/net/snmp FILE -rw-rw-r-- 3407 Aug 11 1992 snmperl.README FILE -rw-r--r-- 17678 Aug 11 1992 snmperl.tar.Z Host ftp.cis.ufl.edu Location: /pub/perl/scripts/snmp Here is the gist of the README: README $Revision: 2.3 $ This directory contains the source code to add callable C subroutines to perl. The subroutines implement the SNMP functions "get", "getnext", and "set". They use the freely-distributable SNMP package (version 1.1b) from CMU. USE: There are four subroutines defined in the callable interface: snmp_get, snmp_next, snmp_set, and snmp_error. snmp_get and snmp_next implement the GET and GETNEXT operations, respectively. The first two calling arguments are the hostname and Community string. The IP address of the host, as a dotted-quad ASCII string, may be used as the hostname. The rest of the calling arguments are a list of variables. See the CMU package documentation for how variables may be specified. snmp_set also takes hostname and Community string as arguments. The remaining arguments are a list of triples consisting of variable name, variable type, and value. The variable type is a string, such as "INTEGER" or "IpAddress". snmp_get, snmp_next, and snmp_set return a list containing alternating variables and values. snmp_get and snmp_next will simply omit non-existent variables on return. snmp_set will fail completely if one of the specified variables does not exist (or is read- only). snmp_error will return a text string containing some error information about the most recent snmp_get|next|set call, if it had an error. OTHER NOTES: I didn't find all the places where the CMU library writes to stderr or calls exit() directly. The changes I made to mib.c involve the formatting of variable values for return to the caller. I took out the descriptive prefix so the string contains only the value. Enumerated types are returned as a string containing the symbolic representation followed in parentheses by the numeric. DISTRIBUTION and OWNERSHIP perl and the CMU SNMP package have their own statements. Read them. The work I've done is free and clear. Just don't say you wrote it if you didn't, and don't say I wrote it if you change it. Guy Streeter streeter@ingr.com April 1, 1992 (not a joke!) Stephen P Potter spp@vx.com Varimetrix Corporation 2350 Commerce Park Drive, Suite 4 Palm Bay, FL 32905 (407) 676-3222 CAD/CAM/CAE/Software ÿ@SUBJECT:comp.lang.perl FAQ 2/5 - Information Sources Message-ID: Path: ns.channel1.com!wizard.pn.com!Germany.EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net swrinde!hookup!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!faqserv From: spp@vx.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.perl,comp.answers,news.answers Subject: comp.lang.perl FAQ 2/5 - Information Sources Supersedes: Followup-To: poster Date: 30 Nov 1994 09:40:58 GMT Organization: none Lines: 579 Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU Distribution: world Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: bloom-picayune.mit.edu X-Last-Updated: 1994/11/14 Originator: faqserv@bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU Xref: ns.channel1.com comp.lang.perl:39242 comp.answers:8359 news.answers:32286 Archive-name: perl-faq/part2 Version: $Id: part2,v 2.3 1994/11/07 18:05:30 spp Exp spp $ Posting-Frequency: bi-weekly This posting contains answers to general information questions, mostly of about information sources. 2.1) Is there a USENET group for Perl? Yes there is: comp.lang.perl. This group, which currently can get up to 100 messages per day, contains all kinds of discussions about Perl; everything from bug reports to new features to the history to humour and trivia. This is the best source of information about anything Perl related, especially what's new with Perl5. Because of it's vast array of topics, it functions as both a comp.lang.* style newsgroup (providing technical information) and also as a rec.* style newsgroup, kind of a support group for Perl addicts (PerlAnon?). Larry is a frequent poster to this group as well as most (all?) of the seasoned Perl programmers. Questions will be answered by some of the most knowledgable Perl Hackers, often within minutes of a question being posted (give or take distribution times). 2.2) Have any books or magazine articles been published about Perl? There have been quite a few books and articles. The most well known and most useful book for 4.036 and earlier is _Programming Perl_ (affectionately known as ``the Camel Book''), written by Larry and Randal Schwartz*, published by O'Reilly & Associates as part of their Nutshell Handbook Series (ISBN: 0-937175-64-1). Besides serving as a reference guide for Perl, it also contains tutorial material and is a great source of examples and cookbook procedures, as well as wit and wisdom, tricks and traps, pranks and pitfalls. The code examples contained therein are available via anonymous FTP from ftp.ora.com in /pub/examples/nutshell/programming_perl/perl.tar.Z or at ftp.cis.ufl.edu in /pub/perl/ora/programming_perl. Corrections and additions to the book can be found in the Perl man page right before the BUGS section under the heading ERRATA AND ADDENDA. A new version of the Camel book, revised and updated for Perl5 is due out sometime around spring of next year. Until then, the man pages distributed with the perl 5.000 source contain a wealth of information on the new features and old incompatibilities with perl4.036. Also available is ``the Llama Book'', _Learning Perl_ by Randal Schwartz, another Nutshell book. This book is a collection of some of the best introductory and tutorial information available about Perl. A definite must for novice Perl users. The examples and code from this book are available from the same places as the Camel book code. (ISBN: 1-56592-042-2) If you can't find these books in your local technical bookstore, they may be ordered directly from O'Reilly by calling 1-800-998-9938 if in North America and 1-707-829-0515 otherwise. Larry routinely carries around a camel stamp to use when autographing copies of his book. If you can catch him at a conference you can usually get him to sign your book for you. Larry Wall has published a 3-part article on perl in Unix World (August through October of 1991), and Rob Kolstad also had a 3- parter in Unix Review (May through July of 1990). Tom Christiansen also has a brief overview article in the trade newsletter Unix Technology Advisor from November of 1989. You might also investigate "The Wisdom of Perl" by Gordon Galligher from SunExpert magazine; April 1991 Volume 2 Number 4. The Dec 92 Computer Language magazine also contains a cover article on Perl, "Perl: the Programmers Toolbox". Many other articles on Perl have been recently published. If you have references, especially on-line copies, please mail them to the FAQ maintainer for inclusion is this notice. The USENIX LISA (Large Installations Systems Administration) Conference have for several years now included many papers of tools written in Perl. Old proceedings of these conferences are available; look in your current issue of ";login:" or send mail to office@usenix.org for further information. At this point, the "writing committe" (Larry, Randal, and Tom; aka ) is looking at: o A heavy rewrite of the Camel to update it to Perl5. Expect the tutorial section to be cut in deference to the Llama. o A light update of the Llama to eliminate the "I think perl5 will do ..." and a change to "Perl5 will do ..." o A new book, "Learning More Perl" (working title), a sequel to the Llama, covering what wasn't covered in the Llama including Perl5. According to Randal, this is the current priority. However, he notes that the new Camel won't be out until sometime in the spring of next year, at the earliest. Prentice Hall also has two perl books, either on the shelves or in the works. The first is ``Perl by Example'' by Ellie Quigley. (385 pages, $26.96, ISBN 0-13-122839-0) A perl tutorial (perl4); every feature is presented via an annotated example and sample output. The second book is called ``Software Engineering with Perl'' by Carl Dichter and Mark Pease. Randal Schwartz has reviewed the second book (SEwP) and has this to say about it: SWwP is not meant as instruction in the Perl language, but rather as an example of how Perl may be used to assist in the semi-formal software engineering development cycles. There's a lot of Perl code that's fairly well commented, but most of the book describes software engineering methodologies. For the perl-challenged, there's a *light* treatment of the language as well, but they refer to the llama and the camel for the real meat. Japan seems to be jumping with Perl books. If you can read japanese here are a few you might be interested in. Thanks to Jeffrey Friedl* for this list (NOTE: my screen cannot handle japanese characters, so this is all in English for the moment NOTE2: These books are written in Japanese, these titles are just translations): Title: Welcome to Perl Country Authors: Kaoru Maeda, Hiroshi Koyama, Yasushi Saito and Arihito Fuse Publisher: Science Company Date: April 25, 1993 ISBN: 4-7819-0697-4 Price: 2472Y Comments: Written during the time the Camel book was being translated. A useful introduction, but uses jperl (Japanese Perl) which is not necessarily compatible. Title: Perl Writing Methods (Perl Calligraphy?) Author: Toshiyuki Masui Publisher: ASCII Corporation Date: July 1, 1993 ISBN: 4-7561-0281-6 Price: 3200Y Comments: More advanced than "Welcome.." and not meant as an introduction. Uses the standard perl and has examples for handling Japanese text. Title: Introduction to Perl Author: Shinji Kono Publisher: ASCII Corporation Date: July 11, 1994 ISBN: 4-7561-0292-1 Price: 1800Y Comments: Uses the interactive Perl debugger to explain how things work. Title: Programming Perl Authors: L Wall & R Schwartz Translator: Yoshiyuri Kondo Publisher: Softbank Corporation Date: February 28, 1993 ISBN: 4-89052-384-7 Price: 4500Y Comments: Official Japanese translation. Somewhat laced with translator notes to explain the humour. The most useful book. There is also a German translation of Programming Perl. It is available from Hanser Verlag: Title: Programmieren in Perl ISBN: 3-446-17257-2 2.3) When will the Camel and Llama books be updated? When they do. :-) Actually, we're looking at having them in print about 6 months from now (for floating values of now :-). Send the writing committee mail (perlbook@perl.com) mail if you have suggestions. 2.4) What FTP resources are available? Within the past year, several ftp sites have sprung up for Perl and Perl related items. The site with the biggest repository of Perl scripts right now seems to be ftp.cis.ufl.edu [128.227.100.198]. The scripts directory has an INDEX with over 400 lines in it, each describing what the script does. The src directory has sources and/or binaries for a number of different perl ports, including MS-Dos, Macintosh and Windows/NT. This is maintained by me, Steve*. Note: I've changed jobs recently and am not currently directly on the Internet. This means this site may get a little out of date until I can get back up to UF and update it. However, I did set up automatic mirrors to many sites, so much of it should remain uptodate. (If only Larry would put the beta patches on netlabs....) Note: European users please use the site src.doc.ic.ac.uk [149.169.2.1] in /pub/computing/programming/languages/perl/ The link speed would be a lot better for all. Contact L.McLoughlin@doc.ic.ac.uk for more information. It is updated daily. This may not be working yet. I'm working with Lee to get it setup. There are also a number of other sites. I'll add more of them as I get information on them. 2.5) What WWW/gopher resources are available? The World Wide Web is exploding with new Perl sites all the time. Some of the more notable ones are: http://www.cis.ufl.edu/perl http://www.metronet.com/1h/perlinfo, which has a great section on Perl5. http://www.eecs.nwu.edu/perl/perl.html http://web.nexor.co.uk/perl/perl.html, a great site for European and UK users. 2.6) Can people who don't have access to USENET get comp.lang.perl? "Perl-Users" is the mailing list version of the comp.lang.perl newsgroup. If you're not lucky enough to be on USENET you can post to comp.lang.perl by sending to one of the following addresses. Which one will work best for you depends on which nets your site is hooked into. Ask your local network guru if you're not certain. Internet: PERL-USERS@VIRGINIA.EDU Perl-Users@UVAARPA.VIRGINIA.EDU BitNet: Perl@Virginia uucp: ...!uunet!virginia!perl-users The Perl-Users list is bidirectionally gatewayed with the USENET newsgroup comp.lang.perl. This means that VIRGINIA functions as a reflector. All traffic coming in from the non-USENET side is immediately posted to the newsgroup. Postings from the USENET side are periodically digested and mailed out to the Perl-Users mailing list. A digest is created and distributed at least once per day, more often if traffic warrants. All requests to be added to or deleted from this list, problems, questions, etc., should be sent to: Internet: Perl-Users-Request@Virginia.EDU Perl-Users-Request@uvaarpa.Virginia.EDU BitNet: Perl-Req@Virginia uucp: ...!uunet!virginia!perl-users-request Coordinator: Marc Rouleau 2.7) Are archives of comp.lang.perl available? Yes, there are. ftp.cis.ufl.edu:/pub/perl/comp.lang.perl/monthly has an almost complete collection dating back to 12/89 (missing 08/91 through 12/93). They are kept as one large file for each month. A more sophisticated query and retrieval mechanism is desirable. Preferably one that allows you to retrieve article using a fast- access indices, keyed on at least author, date, subject, thread (as in "trn") and probably keywords. Right now, the MH pick command works for this, but it is very slow to select on 18000 articles. If you have, or know where I can find, the missing sections, please let perlfaq@perl.com know. 2.8) Is there a WAIS server for comp.lang.perl? Yes there is. Set your WAIS client to archive.orst.edu:9000/comp.lang.perl. According to their introduction, they have a complete selection from 1989 on. Bill Middleton offers this: "I have setup a perl script retrieval service and WaisSearch here at feenix. To check it out, just point your gopher at us, and select the appropriate menu option. The WaisSearch is of the iubio type, which means you can do boolean searching. Thus you might try something like: caller ioctl and fcntl grep and socket not curses and other things to see examples of how other folks have done this or that. This service is still under construction, but I'd like to get feedback, if you have some time. There's also a WaisSearch into all the RFC's and some other fairly nifty stuff." 2.9) What other sources of information about Perl or training are available? Johan Vromans* created an beautiful reference guide. The reference guide comes with the Camel book in a nice, glossy format. The LaTeX (source) and PostScript (ready to print) versions are available for FTP from ftp.cs.ruu.nl:/pub/DOC/perlref-4.036.1.tar.Z in Europe or from ftp.cis.ufl.edu:/pub/perl/doc/perlref-4.036.tar.gz in the United States. Obsolete versions in TeX or troff may still be available, but these versions don't print as nicely. See also: [] ftp://ftp.uu.net/languages/perl/perlref-4.036.1.tar.gz [] ftp://ftp.cs.ruu.nl/pub/DOC/perlref-4.036.1.tar.gz [] ftp://ftp.khoros.unm.edu/pub/perl/perlref-4.036.1.tar.gz Johan is working on an update to this document to include perl5 functionality, which he hopes to release by Christmas 1994. There is a #Perl channel on IRC (Internet Relay Chat) where Tom and Randal have been known to hang out. Here you can get immediate answers to questions from some of the most well-known Perl Hackers. The perl5-porters (perl5-porters@isu.edu) mailing list was created to aid in communication among the people working on perl5. However, it has overgrown this function and now also handles a good deal of traffic about perl internals. 2.10) Where can I get training classes on Perl? USENIX, LISA, SUG, WCSAS, AUUG, FedUnix and Europen sponsor tutorials of varying lengths on Perl at the System Administration and General Conferences. These public classes are typically taught by Tom Christiansen*. In part, Tom and Randal teach Perl to help keep bread on their tables long enough while they continue their pro bono efforts of documenting perl (Tom keeps writing more man pages for it :-) and expanding the perl toolkit through extension libraries, work which they enjoy doing as it's fun and helps out the whole world, but which really doesn't pay the bills. Such is the nature of free(ly available) software. Send mail to for details and availability. Tom is also available to teach on-site classes, included courses on advanced perl and perl5. Classes run anywhere from one day to week long sessions and cover a wide range of subject matter. Classes can include lab time with exercises, a generally beneficial aspect. If you would like more information regarding Perl classes or when the next public appearances are, please contact Tom directly. Randal Schwartz* provides a 2-day lecture-only and a 4-5 day lecture-lab course based on his popular book "Learning Perl". For details, contact Randal directly via email or at 1.503.777.0095. Internet One provides a 2 day "Introduction to Perl" and 2 day "Advanced Perl" workshop. The 50% hands-on and 50% lecture format allow attendees to write several programs themselves. Supplied are the user manuals, reference copies of Larry Wall's "Program- ming Perl", and a UNIX directory of all training examples and labs. To obtain outlines, pricing, or scheduling information, use the following: o Phone: 1.303.444.1993 o Email: info@InternetOne.COM o See our Ad in the "SysAdmin" magazine o View the outlines via the Web: http://www.InternetOne.COM/ 2.11) What companies use or ship Perl? At this time, the known list of companies that ship Perl includes at least the following, although some have snuck it into /usr/contrib or its moral equivalent: BSDI Comdisco Systems CONVEX Computer Corporation Crosspoint Solutions Dell DRD Corporation IBM (SP systems) Intergraph Kubota Pacific Netlabs SGI (without taintperl) Univel Furthermore, the following vendors are reported to begin shipping perl standard with their systems in the very near future: Sun Some companies ship it on their "User Contributed Software Tape", such as DEC and HP. Apple Computer has shipped the MPW version of Macintosh Perl on one of their Developer CDs (Essentials*Tools*Objects #11) (and they included it under "Essentials" :-) Many other companies use Perl internally for purposes of tools development, systems administration, installation scripts, and test suites. Rumor has it that the large workstation vendors (the TLA set) are seriously looking into shipping Perl with their standard systems "soon". úÿ People with support contracts with their vendors are actively encouraged to submit enhancement requests that Perl be shipped as part of their standard system. It would, at the very least, reduce the FTP load on the Internet. :-) If you know of any others, please send them in. 2.12) Is there commercial, third-party support for Perl? Not really. Although perl is included in the GNU distribution, at last check, Cygnus does not offer support for it. However, it's unclear whether they've ever been offered sufficient financial incentive to do so. On the other hand, you do have comp.lang.perl as a totally gratis support mechanism. As long as you ask "interesting" questions, you'll probably get plenty of help. :-) While some vendors do ship Perl with their platforms, that doesn't mean they support it on arbitrary other platforms. And in fact, all they'll probably do is forward any bug reports on to Larry. In practice, this is far better support than you could hope for from nearly any vendor. The companies who won't use something unless they can pay money for it will be left out. Often they're motivated by wanting someone whom they could sue. If all they want is someone to help them out with Perl problems, there's always the net. And if they really want to pay someone for that help, well, Tom and Randal are always looking for a job. :-) If companies want "commercial support" for it badly enough, speak up -- something might be able to be arranged. 2.13) What is a JAPH? What does "Will hack perl for ..." mean? These are the "just another perl hacker" signatures that some people sign their postings with. About 100 of the of the earlier ones are available from the various FTP sites. When people started running out of tricky and interesting JAPHs, some of them turned to writing "Will hack perl for ..." quotes. While sometimes humourous, they just didn't have the flair of the JAPHs and have since almost completely vanished. 2.14) Where can I get a list of Larry Wall witticisms? Over a hundred quips by Larry, from postings of his or source code, can be found in many of the FTP sites or through the World Wide Web at "ftp://ftp.cis.ufl.edu/pub/perl/misc/lwall-quotes" 2.15) What are the known bugs? These apply to version 5 of perl. See also: `What does "Malformed command links" mean?' for a version 4 bug. The README says it's a pre-release. Workaround: ignore this sentence. Installs perl0.000 and sperl0.000 instead of 5.000. Workaround: rename the files. The debugger appears to be broken on "my" variables; Workaround: none yet Recursive signal handlers eventually core dump. Workaround: ease up on the ^C key. The following code misbehaves: print ++$_ . "\n" until /0/; Workaround: initialize your variable Destructors can clobber $@ on exit from an eval Workaround: local $@; eval {...}; 2.16) Where should I post bugs? The best place to send your bug is , which is currently just alias for . You may subscribe to the list in the customary fashion via mail to . Feel free to post your bugs to the comp.lang.perl newsgroup as well, but do make sure they still go to the mailing list. To enhance your chances of getting any bug you report fixed: 1. Try to narrow the problem down to as small a piece of code as possible. If you can get it down to 1 line of Perl then so much the better. 2. Include a copy of the output from the myconfig script from the Perl source distribution in your posting. 2.17) Where should I post source code? You should post source code to whichever group is most appropriate, but feel free to cross-post to comp.lang.perl. If you want to cross-post to alt.sources, please make sure it follows their posting standards, including setting the Followups-To header line to NOT include alt.sources; see their FAQ for details. 2.18) Where can I learn about object-oriented Perl programming? The perlobj(1) man page is a good place to start, and then you can check out the excellent perlbot(1) man page written by the dean of perl o-o himself, Dean Roehrich. Areas covered include the following: Idx Subsections in perlobj.1 Lines 1 NAME 2 2 DESCRIPTION 16 3 An Object is Simply a Reference 60 4 A Class is Simply a Package 31 5 A Method is Simply a Subroutine 34 6 Method Invocation 75 7 Destructors 14 8 Summary 7 Idx Subsections in perlbot.1 Lines 1 NAME 2 2 INTRODUCTION 9 3 Instance Variables 43 4 Scalar Instance Variables 21 5 Instance Variable Inheritance 35 6 Object Relationships 33 7 Overriding Superclass Methods 49 8 Using Relationship with Sdbm 45 9 Thinking of Code Reuse 111 The section on instance variables should prove very helpful to those wondering how to get data inheritance in perl. 2.19) Where can I learn about linking C with Perl? [h2xs] While it used to be deep magic, how to do this is now revealed in the perlapi(1), perlguts(1), and perlcall(1) man pages, which treat with this matter extensively. 2.20) What is perl.com? Perl.com is just Tom's domain name, registered as dedicated to "Perl training and consulting". While not a proper ftp site (he hasn't got the bandwidth (yet)), it does serve as a clearinghouse for certain perl related mailing list. That means that you should always be able to get to Larry, Tom, or Randal through that host. The following aliases work: perl-packrats: The archivist list perl-porters: The porters list perlbook: The Camel/Llama/Alpaca writing committee perlbugs: The bug list (perl-porters for now) perlclasses: Info on Perl training perlfaq: Submissions/Errata to the Perl FAQ (Tom and Steve) perlrefguide: Submissions/Errata to the Perl FAQ (Johan) y 2.21) What do the asterisks (*) throughout the FAQ stand for? To keep from cluttering up the FAQ and for easy reference all email addresses have been collected in this location. For each person listed, I offer my thanks for their input and help. * Larry Wall * Tom Christiansen * Stephen P Potter * Andreas Koenig * Bill Eldridge * Buzz Moschetti * Casper H.S. Dik * David Muir Sharnoff * Dean Roehrich * Dominic Giampaolo , * Frederic Chauveau * Gene Spafford * Guido van Rossum * Henk P Penning * Jeff Friedl * Johan Vromans * John Dallman * John Lees * John Ousterhout * Jon Biggar * Malcolm Beattie * Michael D'Errico * Randal Schwartz * Roberto Salama * Steven L Kunz * Theodore C. Law * Thomas R. Kimpton * Timothy Murphy Stephen P Potter spp@vx.com Varimetrix Corporation 2350 Commerce Park Drive, Suite 4 Palm Bay, FL 32905 (407) 676-3222 CAD/CAM/CAE/Software ÿ@SUBJECT:comp.lang.perl FAQ 3/5 - Programming Aids Message-ID: Path: ns.channel1.com!wizard.pn.com!Germany.EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net spool.mu.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!faqserv From: spp@vx.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.perl,comp.answers,news.answers Subject: comp.lang.perl FAQ 3/5 - Programming Aids Supersedes: Followup-To: poster Date: 30 Nov 1994 09:40:38 GMT Organization: none Lines: 424 Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU Distribution: world Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: bloom-picayune.mit.edu X-Last-Updated: 1994/11/14 Originator: faqserv@bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU Xref: ns.channel1.com comp.lang.perl:39238 comp.answers:8355 news.answers:32282 Archive-name: perl-faq/part3 Version: $Id: part3,v 2.1 1994/10/25 13:56:19 spp Exp spp $ Posting-Frequency: bi-weekly This posting contains answers to general information questions, mostly about programming aids. 3.1) How can I use Perl interactively? The easiest way to do this is to run Perl under its debugger. If you have no program to debug, you can invoke the debugger on an `empty' program like this: perl -de 0 (The more positive hackers prefer "perl -de 1". :-) Now you can type in any legal Perl code, and it will be immediately evaluated. You can also examine the symbol table, get stack backtraces, check variable values, and if you want to, set breakpoints and do the other things you can do in a symbolic debugger. 3.2) Is there a Perl profiler? While there isn't one included with the perl source distribution (yet) various folks have written packages that allow you to do at least some sort of profiling. The strategy usually includes modifying the perl debugger to handle profiling. Authors of these packages include Wayne Thompson Ray Lischner Kresten Krab Thorup The original articles by these folks containing their profilers are available on convex.com in /pub/perl/information/profiling.shar via anon ftp. 3.3) Is there a yacc for Perl? Yes!! It's a version of Berkeley yacc that outputs Perl code instead of C code! You can get this from ftp.sterling.com [192.124.9.1] in /local/perl-byacc1.8.1.tar.Z, or send the author mail for details. 3.4) Is there a pretty-printer for Perl? That depends on what you mean. If you want something that works like vgrind on Perl programs, then the answer is "yes, nearly". Here's a vgrind entry for perl: PERL|perl|Perl:\ :pb=^\d?(sub|package)\d\p\d:\ :bb={:be=}:cb=#:ce=$:sb=":se=\e":lb=':\ :le=\e':tl:\ :id=_:\ :kw=\ if for foreach unless until while continue else elsif \ do eval require \ die exit \ defined delete reset \ goto last redo next dump \ local undef return \ write format \ sub package It doesn't actually do everything right; in particular, things like $#, $', s#/foo##, and $foo'bar all confuse it. David Levine uses this: # perl 4.x David Levine 05 apr 1993 # Derived from Tom Christiansen's perl vgrindef. I'd like to treat all of # perl's built-ins as keywords, but vgrind fields are limited to 1024 # characters and the built-ins overflow that (surprise :-). So, I didn't # include the dbm*, end*, get*, msg*, sem*, set*, and shm* functions. I # couldn't come up with an easy way to distinguish beginnings of literals # ('...') from package prefixes, so literals are not marked. # Be sure to: # 1) include whitespace between a subprogram name and its opening { # 2) include whitespace before a comment (so that $# doesn't get # interpreted as one). perl4:\ :pb=^\d?(sub|package)\d\p\d:\ :id=$%@_:\ :bb=\e{:be=\e}:cb=\d\e#:ce=$:sb=\e":se=\e":\ :kw=accept alarm atan2 bind binmode caller chdir chmod chop \ chown chroot close closedir connect continue cos crypt defined delete \ die do dump each else elsif eof eval exec exit exp fcntl fileno flock \ for foreach fork format getc gmtime goto grep hex if include index int \ ioctl join keys kill last length link listen local localtime log lstat \ m mkdir next oct open opendir ord pack package pipe pop print printf \ push q qq qx rand read readdir readlink recv redo rename require reset \ return reverse rewinddir rindex rmdir s scalar seek seekdir select send \ shift shutdown sin sleep socket socketpair sort splice split sprintf \ sqrt srand stat study sub substr symlink syscall sysread system \ syswrite tell telldir time times tr truncate umask undef unless unlink \ unpack unshift until utime values vec wait waitpid wantarray warn while \ write y: If what you mean is whether there is a program that will reformat the program much as indent(1) will do for C, then the answer is no. The complex feedback between the scanner and the parser (as in the things that confuse vgrind) make it challenging at best to write a stand- alone Perl parser. 3.5) There's an a2p and an s2p; why isn't there a p2c (perl-to-C)? Because the Pascal people would be upset that we stole their name. :-) The dynamic nature of Perl's do and eval operators (and remember that constructs like s/$mac_donald/$mac_gregor/eieio count as an eval) would make this very difficult. To fully support them, you would have to put the whole Perl interpreter into each compiled version for those scripts using them. This is what undump does right now, if your machine has it. If what you're doing will be faster in C than in Perl, maybe it should have been written in C in the first place. For things that ought to be written in Perl, the interpreter will be just about as fast, because the pattern matching routines won't work any faster linked into a C program. Even in the case of simple Perl programs that don't do any fancy evals, the major gain would be in compiling the control flow tests, with the rest still being a maze of twisty, turny subroutine calls. Since these are not usually the major bottleneck in the program, there's not as much to be gained via compilation as one might think. However, we're still looking for someone to generate byte-compiled code for Perl, or eventually even C code out of it. These are probably masters and PhD thesis topics respectively, and no one has begun work on it yet. 3.6) Where can I get a perl-mode for emacs? Since Emacs version 19 patchlevel 22 or so, there has been both a perl-mode.el and support for the perl debugger built in. These should come with the standard Emacs 19 distribution. In the perl source directory, you'll find a directory called "emacs", which contains several files that should help you. 3.7) Is there a Perl shell? Not really. Perl is a programming language, not a command interpreter. There is a very simple one called "perlsh" included in the Perl source distribution. It just does this: $/ = ''; # set paragraph mode $SHlinesep = "\n"; while ($SHcmd = <>) { $/ = $SHlinesep; eval $SHcmd; print $@ || "\n"; $SHlinesep = $/; $/ = ''; } Not very interesting, eh? Daniel Smith is working on an interactive Perl shell called SoftList. It's currently at version 3.0beta. SoftList 3.0 has tcsh-like command line editing, can let you define a file of aliases so that you can run chunks of perl or UNIX commands, and so on. You can send mail to him for further information and availability. 3.8) How can I use curses with perl? In release 4 of perl, the only way to do this was was to build a curseperl binary by linking in your C curses library as described in the usub subdirectory of the perl sources. This requires a modicum of work, but it will be reasonably fast since it's all in C (assuming you consider curses reasonably fast. :-) Programs written using this method require the modified curseperl, not vanilla perl, to run. While this is something of a disadvantage, experience indicates that it's better to use curseperl than to try to roll your own using termcap directly. Fortunately, in version 5, Curses is a dynamically loaded extension by William Setzer*. You should be able to pick it up wherever you get Perl 5 from, or at least these places: ftp://ftp.ncsu.edu/pub/math/wsetzer/cursperl5a6.tar.gz ftp://ftp.metronet.com/pub/perlinfo/perl5/cursperl5a6.tar.gz ftp://ftp.cs.ruu.nl/pub/PERL/perl5.0/cursperl5a6.tar.gz For a good example of using (v4) curseperl, you might want to pick up a copy of Steven L Kunz's* "perl menus" package ("menu.pl") via anonymous FTP from "ftp.iastate.edu". It's in the /pub/perl as menu.pl.v2.3.shr1 menu.pl.v2.3.shr2 menu.pl.v2.3.tar.Z menus.pl is a complete menu front-end for curseperl and demonstates a lot of things (plus it is useful to boot if you want full-screen menu selection ability). Another possibility is to use Henk Penning's cterm package, a curses emulation library written in perl. cterm is actually a separate program with which you communicate via a pipe. It is available from ftp.cs.ruu.nl [131.211.80.17] via anonymous ftp. in the directory pub/PERL. You may also acquire the package via email in compressed, uuencoded form by sending a message to mail-server@cs.ruu.nl containing these lines: begin send PERL/cterm.shar.Z end See the question on retrieving perl via mail for more information on how to retrieve other items of interest from the mail server there. 3.9) How can I use X with Perl? Right now, you have several choices. If you are still using perl4, use the WAFE or STDWIN packages, or try to make your own usub binding. However, if you've upgraded to version 5, you have several exciting possibilities, with more popping up each day. Right now, Tk and Sx are the best known such extensions. If you like the tk package, you should get the Tk extension kit, written by Malcolm Beattie*. Here are some places to get it: Tk (as in tcl/tk, but sans tcl) ftp://ftp.cis.ufl.edu/pub/perl/src/tkperl/tkperl5a4.tar.gz ftp://ftp.khoros.unm.edu/pub/perl/extensions/tkperl5a4.tar.gz ftp://ftp.metronet.com/pub/perlinfo/perl5/tkperl/tkperl5a4.tar.gz ftp://ftp.cs.ruu.nl/pub/PERL/perl5.0/tkperl5a4.tar.gz ftp://black.ox.ac.uk/src/ALPHA/tkperl5a4.tar.gz (try 5a5 everywhere after 2pm UST Thu 20 Oct 1994, as in) ftp://sable.ox.ac.uk/pub/perl/tkperl5a5.tar.gz You may also use the old Sx package, (Athena & Xlib), written by originally written by by Dominic Giampaolo*, then and rewritten for Sx by Frederic Chauveau*.fr>. It's available from these sites: ftp://ftp.pasteur.fr/pub/Perl/Sx.tar.gz ftp://ftp.khoros.unm.edu/pub/perl/extensions/Sx.tar.gz ftp://ftp.metronet.com/pub/perlinfo/perl5/Sx.tar.gz ftp://ftp.cs.ruu.nl/pub/PERL/perl5.0/PerlDoc.ps.gz STDWIN is a library written by Guido van Rossum* (author of the Python programming language) that is portable between Mac, Dos and X11. One could write a Perl agent to speak to this STDWIN server. WAFE is a package that implements a symbolic interface to the Athena widgets (X11R5). A typical Wafe application consists in our framework of two parts: the front-end (we call it Wafe for Widget[Athena]front end) and an application program running typically as a separate process. The application program can be implemented in an arbitrary programming language and talks to the front-end via stdio. Since Wafe (the front-end) was developed using the extensible TCL shell (cite John Ousterhout), an application program can dynamically submit requests to the front-end to build up the graphical user interface; the application can even down-load application specific procedures into the front-end. The distribution contains sample application programs in Perl, GAWK, Prolog, TCL, and C talking to the same Wafe binary. Many of the demo applications are implemented in Perl. Wafe 0.9 can be obtained via anonymous ftp from ftp.wu-wien.ac.at[137.208.3.5]:pub/src/X11/wafe-0.9.tar.Z Alternatively, you could use wish from tcl. #!/usr/local/bin/perl ##################################################################### # An example of calling wish as a subshell under Perl and # interactively communicating with it through sockets. # # The script is directly based on Gustaf Neumann's perlwafe script. # # Dov Grobgeld dov@menora.weizmann.ac.il # 1993-05-17 ##################################################################### $wishbin = "/usr/local/bin/wish"; die "socketpair unsuccessful: $!!\n" unless socketpair(W0,WISH,1,1,0); if ($pid=fork) { select(WISH); $| = 1; select(STDOUT); # Create some TCL procedures print WISH 'proc echo {s} {puts stdout $s; flush stdout}',"\n"; # Create the widgets print WISH <) { chop; print "Wish sais: <$_>\n"; if (/^quit/) { print WISH "destroy .\n"; last; } } wait; } elsif (defined $pid) { open(STDOUT, ">&W0"); open(STDIN, ">&W0"); close(W0); select(STDOUT); $| = 1; exec "$wishbin --"; } else { die "fork error: $!\n"; } 3.10) Can I dynamically load C user routines? Yes -- dynamic loading comes with the distribution. That means that you no longer need 18 different versions of fooperl floating around. In fact, all of perl can be stuck into a libperl.so library and then your /usr/local/bin/perl binary reduced to just 50k or so. See DynLoader(3pm) for details. In perl4, the answer is kinda. One package has been released that does this, by Roberto Salama*. He writes: Here is a version of dylperl, dynamic linker for perl. The code here is based on Oliver Sharp's May 1993 article in Dr. Dobbs Journal (Dynamic Linking under Berkeley UNIX). dyl.h dyl.c - code extracted from Oliver Sharp's article hash.h hash.c - Berkeley's hash functions, should use perl's but could not be bothered dylperl.c - perl usersubs user.c - userinit function sample.c - sample code to be dyl'ed sample2.c - " test.pl - sample perl script that dyl's sample*.o The Makefile assumes that uperl.o is in /usr/local/src/perl/... You will probable have to change this to reflect your installation. Other than that, just type 'make'... The idea behind being able to dynamically link code into perl is that the linked code should become perl functions, i.e. they can be invoked as &foo(...). For this to happen, the incrementally loaded code must use the perl stack, look at sample.c to get a better idea. The few functions that make up this package are outlined below. &dyl("file.o"): dynamically link file.o. All functions and non- static variables become visible from within perl. This function returns a pointer to an internal hash table úÿ corresponding to the symbol table of the newly loaded code. eg: $ht = &dyl("sample.o") This function can also be called with the -L and -l ld options. eg: $ht = &dyl(""sample2.o", "-L/usr/lib", "-lm") will also pick up the math library if sample.o accesses any symbols there. &dyl_find("func"): find symbol 'func' and return its symbol table entry &dyl_functions($ht): print the contents of the internal hash table &dyl_print_symbols($f): prints the contents of the symbol returned by dyl_find() There is very little documentation, maybe something to do for a future release. The files sample.o, and sample2.o contain code to be incrementally loaded, test.pl is the test perl script. Comments are welcome. I submit this code for public consumption and, basically, am not responsible for it in any way. 3.11) What is undump and where can I get it? The undump program comes from the TeX distribution. If you have TeX, then you may have a working undump. If you don't, and you can't get one, *AND* you have a GNU emacs working on your machine that can clone itself, then you might try taking its unexec() function and compiling Perl with -DUNEXEC, which will make Perl call unexec() instead of abort(). You'll have to add unexec.o to the objects line in the Makefile. If you succeed, post to comp.lang.perl about your experience so others can benefit from it. If you have a version of undump that works with Perl, please submit its anon-FTP whereabouts to the FAQ maintainer. 3.12) How can I get '#!perl' to work under MS-DOS? John Dallman* has written a program "#!perl.exe" which will do this. It is available through anonymous ftp from ftp.ee.umanitoba.ca in the directory /pub/msdos/perl/hbp_20.zip. This program works by finding the script and perl.exe, building a command line and running perl.exe as a child process. For more information on this, contact John directly. Stephen P Potter spp@vx.com Varimetrix Corporation 2350 Commerce Park Drive, Suite 4 Palm Bay, FL 32905 (407) 676-3222 CAD/CAM/CAE/Software ÿ@SUBJECT:comp.lang.perl FAQ 4/5 - General Programming Message-ID: Path: ns.channel1.com!wizard.pn.com!Germany.EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net spool.mu.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!faqserv From: spp@vx.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.perl,comp.answers,news.answers Subject: comp.lang.perl FAQ 4/5 - General Programming Supersedes: Followup-To: poster Date: 30 Nov 1994 09:40:53 GMT Organization: none Lines: 1065 Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU Distribution: world Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: bloom-picayune.mit.edu X-Last-Updated: 1994/11/14 Originator: faqserv@bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU Xref: ns.channel1.com comp.lang.perl:39241 comp.answers:8358 news.answers:32285 Archive-name: perl-faq/part4 Version: $Id: part4,v 2.3 1994/11/07 18:06:47 spp Exp spp $ Posting-Frequency: bi-weekly This posting contains answers to the following questions about General Programming, Regular Expressions (Regexp) and Input/Output: 4.1) What are all these $@%*<> signs and how do I know when to use them? Those are type specifiers: $ for scalar values @ for indexed arrays % for hashed arrays (associative arrays) * for all types of that symbol name. These are sometimes used like pointers <> are used for inputting a record from a filehandle. See the question on arrays of arrays for more about Perl pointers. While there are a few places where you don't actually need these type specifiers, except for files, you should always use them. Note that is NOT the type specifier for files; it's the equivalent of awk's getline function, that is, it reads a line from the handle FILE. When doing open, close, and other operations besides the getline function on files, do NOT use the brackets. Beware of saying: $foo = BAR; Which wil be interpreted as $foo = 'BAR'; and not as $foo = ; If you always quote your strings, you'll avoid this trap. Normally, files are manipulated something like this (with appropriate error checking added if it were production code): open (FILE, ">/tmp/foo.$$"); print FILE "string\n"; close FILE; If instead of a filehandle, you use a normal scalar variable with file manipulation functions, this is considered an indirect reference to a filehandle. For example, $foo = "TEST01"; open($foo, "file"); After the open, these two while loops are equivalent: while (<$foo>) {} while () {} as are these two statements: close $foo; close TEST01; but NOT to this: while (<$TEST01>) {} # error ^ ^ note spurious dollar sign This is another common novice mistake; often it's assumed that open($foo, "output.$$"); will fill in the value of $foo, which was previously undefined. This just isn't so -- you must set $foo to be the name of a filehandle before you attempt to open it. 4.2) How come Perl operators have different precedence than C operators? Actually, they don't; all C operators have the same precedence in Perl as they do in C. The problem is with a class of functions called list operators, e.g. print, chdir, exec, system, and so on. These are somewhat bizarre in that they have different precedence depending on whether you look on the left or right of them. Basically, they gobble up all things on their right. For example, unlink $foo, "bar", @names, "others"; will unlink all those file names. A common mistake is to write: unlink "a_file" || die "snafu"; The problem is that this gets interpreted as unlink("a_file" || die "snafu"); To avoid this problem, you can always make them look like function calls or use an extra level of parentheses: unlink("a_file") || die "snafu"; (unlink "a_file") || die "snafu"; In perl5, there are low precedence "and", "or", and "not" operators, which bind les tightly than comma. This alllows you to write: unlink $foo, "bar", @names, "others" or die "snafu"; Sometimes you actually do care about the return value: unless ($io_ok = print("some", "list")) { } Yes, print() returns I/O success. That means $io_ok = print(2+4) * 5; returns 5 times whether printing (2+4) succeeded, and print(2+4) * 5; returns the same 5*io_success value and tosses it. See the perlop(1) man page's section on Precedence for more gory details, and be sure to use the -w flag to catch things like this. 4.3) What's the difference between dynamic and static (lexical) scoping? What are my() and local()? [NOTE: This question refers to perl5 only. There is no my() in perl4] Scoping refers to visibility of variables. A dynamic variable is created via local() and is just a local value for a global variable, whereas a lexical variable created via my() is more what you're expecting from a C auto. (See also "What's the difference between deep and shallow binding.") In general, we suggest you use lexical variables wherever possible, as they're faster to access and easier to understand. The "use strict vars" pragma will enforce that all variables are either lexical, or full classified by package name. We strongly suggest that you develop your code with "use strict;" and the -w flag. (When using formats, however, you will still have to use dynamic variables.) Here's an example of the difference: $scount = 1; $lcount = 2; sub foo { my($i,$j) = @_; my $scount = 10; local $lcount = 20; &bar(); } sub bar { print "scount is $scount\en"; print "lcount is $lcount\en"; } This prints: scount is 1 lcount is 20 Notice that the variables declared with my() are visible only within the scope of the block which names them. They are not visible outside of this block, not even in routines or blocks that it calls. local() variables, on the other hand, are visible to routines that are called from the block where they are declared. Neither is visible after the end (the final closing curly brace) of the block at all. Oh, lexical variables are only available in perl5. Have we mentioned yet that you might consider upgrading? :-) 4.4) What's the difference between deep and shallow binding? This only matters when you're making subroutines yourself, at least so far. This will give you shallow binding: { my $x = time; $coderef = sub { $x }; } When you call &$coderef(), it will get whatever dynamic $x happens to be around when invoked. However, you can get the other behaviour this way: { my $x = time; $coderef = eval "sub { \$x }"; } Now you'll access the lexical variable $x which is set to the time the subroutine was created. Note that the difference in these two behaviours can be considered a bug, not a feature, so you should in particular not rely upon shallow binding, as it will likely go away in the future. See perlref(1). 4.5) How can I manipulate fixed-record-length files? The most efficient way is using pack and unpack. This is faster than using substr. Here is a sample chunk of code to break up and put back together again some fixed-format input lines, in this case, from ps. # sample input line: # 15158 p5 T 0:00 perl /mnt/tchrist/scripts/now-what $ps_t = 'A6 A4 A7 A5 A*'; open(PS, "ps|"); $_ = ; print; while () { ($pid, $tt, $stat, $time, $command) = unpack($ps_t, $_); for $var ('pid', 'tt', 'stat', 'time', 'command' ) { print "$var: <", eval "\$$var", ">\n"; } print 'line=', pack($ps_t, $pid, $tt, $stat, $time, $command), "\n"; } 4.6) How can I make a file handle local to a subroutine? You must use the type-globbing *VAR notation. Here is some code to cat an include file, calling itself recursively on nested local include files (i.e. those with #include "file", not #include ): sub cat_include { local($name) = @_; local(*FILE); local($_); warn "\n"; if (!open (FILE, $name)) { warn "can't open $name: $!\n"; return; } while () { if (/^#\s*include "([^"]*)"/) { &cat_include($1); } else { print; } } close FILE; } 4.7) How can I call alarm() or usleep() from Perl? If you want finer granularity than 1 second (as usleep() provides) and have itimers and syscall() on your system, you can use the following. You could also use select(). It takes a floating-point number representing how long to delay until you get the SIGALRM, and returns a floating- point number representing how much time was left in the old timer, if any. Note that the C function uses integers, but this one doesn't mind fractional numbers. # alarm; send me a SIGALRM in this many seconds (fractions ok) # tom christiansen sub alarm { require 'syscall.ph'; require 'sys/time.ph'; local($ticks) = @_; local($in_timer,$out_timer); local($isecs, $iusecs, $secs, $usecs); local($itimer_t) = 'L4'; # should be &itimer'typedef() $secs = int($ticks); $usecs = ($ticks - $secs) * 1e6; $out_timer = pack($itimer_t,0,0,0,0); $in_timer = pack($itimer_t,0,0,$secs,$usecs); syscall(&SYS_setitimer, &ITIMER_REAL, $in_timer, $out_timer) && die "alarm: setitimer syscall failed: $!"; ($isecs, $iusecs, $secs, $usecs) = unpack($itimer_t,$out_timer); return $secs + ($usecs/1e6); } 4.8) How can I do an atexit() or setjmp()/longjmp() in Perl? (Exception handling) Perl's exception-handling mechanism is its eval operator. You can use eval as setjmp and die as longjmp. Here's an example of Larry's for timed-out input, which in C is often implemented using setjmp and longjmp: $SIG{ALRM} = TIMEOUT; sub TIMEOUT { die "restart input\n" } do { eval { &realcode } } while $@ =~ /^restart input/; sub realcode { alarm 15; $ans = ; alarm 0; } Here's an example of Tom's for doing atexit() handling: sub atexit { push(@_exit_subs, @_) } sub _cleanup { unlink $tmp } &atexit('_cleanup'); eval <<'End_Of_Eval'; $here = __LINE__; # as much code here as you want End_Of_Eval $oops = $@; # save error message # now call his stuff for (@_exit_subs) { &$_() } $oops && ($oops =~ s/\(eval\) line (\d+)/$0 . " line " . ($1+$here)/e, die $oops); You can register your own routines via the &atexit function now. You might also want to use the &realcode method of Larry's rather than embedding all your code in the here-is document. Make sure to leave via die rather than exit, or write your own &exit routine and call that instead. In general, it's better for nested routines to exit via die rather than exit for just this reason. In Perl5, it is easy to set this up because of the automatic processing of per-package END functions. Eval is also quite useful for testing for system dependent features, like symlinks, or using a user-input regexp that might otherwise blowup on you. 4.9) How do I catch signals in perl? Perl allows you to trap signals using the %SIG associative array. Using the signals you want to trap as the key, you can assign a subroutine to that signal. The %SIG array will only contain those values which the programmer defines. Therefore, you do not have to assign all signals. For example, to exit cleanly from a ^C: $SIG{'INT'} = 'CLEANUP'; sub CLEANUP { print "\n\nCaught Interrupt (^C), Aborting\n"; exit(1); } There are two special "routines" for signals called DEFAULT and IGNORE. DEFAULT erases the current assignment, restoring the default value of the signal. IGNORE causes the signal to be ignored. In general, you don't need to remember these as you can emulate their functionality with standard programming features. DEFAULT can be emulated by deleting the signal from the array and IGNORE can be emulated by any undeclared subroutine. 4.10) Why doesn't Perl interpret my octal data octally? Perl only understands octal and hex numbers as such when they occur as literals in your program. If they are read in from somewhere and assigned, then no automatic conversion takes place. You must explicitly use oct() or hex() if you want this kind of thing to happen. Actually, oct() knows to interpret both hex and octal numbers, while hex only converts hexadecimal ones. For example: { print "What mode would you like? "; $mode = ; $mode = oct($mode); unless ($mode) { print "You can't really want mode 0!\n"; redo; } chmod $mode, $file; } Without the octal conversion, a requested mode of 755 would turn into 01363, yielding bizarre file permissions of --wxrw--wt. If you want something that handles decimal, octal and hex input, you could follow the suggestion in the man page and use: $val = oct($val) if $val =~ /^0/; úÿ 4.11) How can I compare two date strings? If the dates are in an easily parsed, predetermined format, then you can break them up into their component parts and call &timelocal from the distributed perl library. If the date strings are in arbitrary formats, however, it's probably easier to use the getdate program from the Cnews distribution, since it accepts a wide variety of dates. Note that in either case the return values you will really be comparing will be the total time in seconds as returned by time(). Here's a getdate function for perl that's not very efficient; you can do better than this by sending it many dates at once or modifying getdate to behave better on a pipe. Beware the hardcoded pathname. sub getdate { local($_) = shift; s/-(\d{4})$/+$1/ || s/\+(\d{4})$/-$1/; # getdate has broken timezone sign reversal! $_ = `/usr/local/lib/news/newsbin/getdate '$_'`; chop; $_; } Richard Ohnemus actually has a getdate.y for use with the Perl yacc. You can get this from ftp.sterling.com [192.124.9.1] in /local/perl-byacc1.8.1.tar.Z, or send the author mail for details. You might also consider using these: date.pl - print dates how you want with the sysv +FORMAT method date.shar - routines to manipulate and calculate dates ftp-chat2.shar - updated version of ftpget. includes library and demo programs getdate.shar - returns number of seconds since epoch for any given date ptime.shar - print dates how you want with the sysv +FORMAT method You probably want 'getdate.shar'... these and other files can be ftp'd from the /pub/perl/scripts directory on ftp.cis.ufl.edu. See the README file in the /pub/perl directory for time and the European mirror site details. 4.12) How can I find the Julian Day? Here's an example of a Julian Date function provided by Thomas R. Kimpton*. #!/usr/local/bin/perl @theJulianDate = ( 0, 31, 59, 90, 120, 151, 181, 212, 243, 273, 304, 334 ); #********************************************************************* *** #**** Return 1 if we are after the leap day in a leap year. ***** #********************************************************************* *** sub leapDay { my($year,$month,$day) = @_; if (year % 4) { return(0); } if (!(year % 100)) { # years that are multiples of 100 # are not leap years if (year % 400) { # unless they are multiples of 400 return(0); } } if (month < 2) { return(0); } elsif ((month == 2) && (day < 29)) { return(0); } else { return(1); } } #********************************************************************* *** #**** Pass in the date, in seconds, of the day you want the ***** #**** julian date for. If your localtime() returns the year day ***** #**** return that, otherwise figure out the julian date. ***** #********************************************************************* *** sub julianDate { my($dateInSeconds) = @_; my($sec, $min, $hour, $mday, $mon, $year, $wday, $yday); ($sec, $min, $hour, $mday, $mon, $year, $wday, $yday) = localtime($dateInSeconds); if (defined($yday)) { return($yday+1); } else { return($theJulianDate[$mon] + $mday + &leapDay($year,$mon,$mday)); } } print "Today's julian date is: ",&julianDate(time),"\n"; 4.13) What's the fastest way to code up a given task in perl? Post it to comp.lang.perl and ask Tom or Randal a question about it. ;) Because Perl so lends itself to a variety of different approaches for any given task, a common question is which is the fastest way to code a given task. Since some approaches can be dramatically more efficient that others, it's sometimes worth knowing which is best. Unfortunately, the implementation that first comes to mind, perhaps as a direct translation from C or the shell, often yields suboptimal performance. Not all approaches have the same results across different hardware and software platforms. Furthermore, legibility must sometimes be sacrificed for speed. While an experienced perl programmer can sometimes eye-ball the code and make an educated guess regarding which way would be fastest, surprises can still occur. So, in the spirit of perl programming being an empirical science, the best way to find out which of several different methods runs the fastest is simply to code them all up and time them. For example: $COUNT = 10_000; $| = 1; print "method 1: "; ($u, $s) = times; for ($i = 0; $i < $COUNT; $i++) { # code for method 1 } ($nu, $ns) = times; printf "%8.4fu %8.4fs\n", ($nu - $u), ($ns - $s); print "method 2: "; ($u, $s) = times; for ($i = 0; $i < $COUNT; $i++) { # code for method 2 } ($nu, $ns) = times; printf "%8.4fu %8.4fs\n", ($nu - $u), ($ns - $s); Perl5 includes a new module called Benchmark.pm. You can now simplify the code to use the Benchmarking, like so: use Benchmark; timethese($count, { Name1 => '...code for method 1...', Name2 => '...code for method 2...', ... }); It will output something that looks similar to this: Benchmark: timing 100 iterations of Name1, Name2... Name1: 2 secs (0.50 usr 0.00 sys = 0.50 cpu) Name2: 1 secs (0.48 usr 0.00 sys = 0.48 cpu) For example, the following code will show the time difference between three different ways of assigning the first character of a string to a variable: use Benchmark; timethese(100000, { 'regex1' => '$str="ABCD"; $str =~ s/^(.)//; $ch = $1', 'regex2' => '$str="ABCD"; $str =~ s/^.//; $ch = $&', 'substr' => '$str="ABCD"; $ch=substr($str,0,1); substr($str,0,1)="", }); The results will be returned like this: Benchmark: timing 100000 iterations of regex1, regex2, substr... regex1: 11 secs (10.80 usr 0.00 sys = 10.80 cpu) regex2: 10 secs (10.23 usr 0.00 sys = 10.23 cpu) substr: 7 secs ( 5.62 usr 0.00 sys = 5.62 cpu) For more specific tips, see the section on Efficiency in the ``Other Oddments'' chapter at the end of the Camel Book. 4.14) Do I always/never have to quote my strings or use semicolons? You don't have to quote strings that can't mean anything else in the language, like identifiers with any upper-case letters in them. Therefore, it's fine to do this: $SIG{INT} = Timeout_Routine; or @Days = (Sun, Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Fri, Sat, Sun); but you can't get away with this: $foo{while} = until; in place of $foo{'while'} = 'until'; The requirements on semicolons have been increasingly relaxed. You no longer need one at the end of a block, but stylistically, you're better to use them if you don't put the curly brace on the same line: for (1..10) { print } is ok, as is @nlist = sort { $a <=> $b } @olist; but you probably shouldn't do this: for ($i = 0; $i < @a; $i++) { print "i is $i\n" # <-- oops! } because you might want to add lines later, and anyway, it looks funny. :-) 4.15) What is variable suicide and how can I prevent it? Variable suicide is a nasty side effect of dynamic scoping and the way variables are passed by reference. If you say $x = 17; &munge($x); sub munge { local($x); local($myvar) = $_[0]; ... } Then you have just clobbered $_[0]! Why this is occurring is pretty heavy wizardry: the reference to $x stored in $_[0] was temporarily occluded by the previous local($x) statement (which, you're recall, occurs at run-time, not compile-time). The work around is simple, however: declare your formal parameters first: sub munge { local($myvar) = $_[0]; local($x); ... } That doesn't help you if you're going to be trying to access @_ directly after the local()s. In this case, careful use of the package facility is your only recourse. Another manifestation of this problem occurs due to the magical nature of the index variable in a foreach() loop. @num = 0 .. 4; print "num begin @num\n"; foreach $m (@num) { &ug } print "num finish @num\n"; sub ug { local($m) = 42; print "m=$m $num[0],$num[1],$num[2],$num[3]\n"; } Which prints out the mysterious: num begin 0 1 2 3 4 m=42 42,1,2,3 m=42 0,42,2,3 m=42 0,1,42,3 m=42 0,1,2,42 m=42 0,1,2,3 num finish 0 1 2 3 4 What's happening here is that $m is an alias for each element of @num. Inside &ug, you temporarily change $m. Well, that means that you've also temporarily changed whatever $m is an alias to!! The only workaround is to be careful with global variables, using packages, and/or just be aware of this potential in foreach() loops. The perl5 static autos via "my" will not have this problem. 4.16) What does "Malformed command links" mean? This is a bug in 4.035. While in general it's merely a cosmetic problem, it often comanifests with a highly undesirable coredumping problem. Programs known to be affected by the fatal coredump include plum and pcops. This bug has been fixed since 4.036. It did not resurface in 5.000. 4.17) How can I set up a footer format to be used with write()? While the $^ variable contains the name of the current header format, there is no corresponding mechanism to automatically do the same thing for a footer. Not knowing how big a format is going to be until you evaluate it is one of the major problems. If you have a fixed-size footer, you can get footers by checking for line left on page ($-) before each write, and printing the footer yourself if necessary. Another strategy is to open a pipe to yourself, using open(KID, "|- ") and always write()ing to the KID, who then postprocesses its STDIN to rearrange headers and footers however you like. Not very convenient, but doable. 4.18) Why does my Perl program keep growing in size? This is caused by a strange occurance that Larry has dubbed "feeping creaturism". Larry is always adding one more feature, always getting Perl to handle one more problem. Hence, it keeps growing. Once you've worked with perl long enough, you will probably start to do the same thing. You will then notice this problem as you see your scripts becoming larger and larger. Oh, wait... you meant a currently running program and it's stack size. Mea culpa, I misunderstood you. ;) While there may be a real memory leak in the Perl source code or even whichever malloc() you're using, common causes are incomplete eval()s or local()s in loops. An eval() which terminates in error due to a failed parsing will leave a bit of memory unusable. A local() inside a loop: for (1..100) { local(@array); } will build up 100 versions of @array before the loop is done. The work-around is: local(@array); for (1..100) { undef @array; } Larry reports that this behavior is fixed for perl5. 4.19) Can I do RPC in Perl? Yes, you can, since Perl has access to sockets. An example of the rup program written in Perl can be found in the script ruptime.pl at the scripts archive on ftp.cis.ufl.edu. I warn you, however, that it's not a pretty sight, as it's used nothing from h2ph or c2ph, so everything is utterly hard-wired. 4.20) How can I quote a variable to use in a regexp? From the manual: $pattern =~ s/(\W)/\\$1/g; Now you can freely use /$pattern/ without fear of any unexpected meta- characters in it throwing off the search. If you don't know whether a pattern is valid or not, enclose it in an eval to avoid a fatal run- time error. Perl5 provides a vastly improved way of doing this. Simply use the new quotemeta character (\Q) within your variable. 4.21) How can I change the first N letters of a string? Remember that the substr() function produces an lvalue, that is, it may be assigned to. Therefore, to change the first character to an S, you could do this: substr($var,0,1) = 'S'; This assumes that $[ is 0; for a library routine where you can't know $[, you should use this instead: substr($var,$[,1) = 'S'; While it would be slower, you could in this case use a substitute: $var =~ s/^./S/; But this won't work if the string is empty or its first character is a newline, which "." will never match. So you could use this instead: $var =~ s/^[^\0]?/S/; To do things like translation of the first part of a string, use substr, as in: substr($var, $[, 10) =~ tr/a-z/A-Z/; If you don't know the length of what to translate, something like this works: /^(\S+)/ && substr($_,$[,length($1)) =~ tr/a-z/A-Z/; úÿ For some things it's convenient to use the /e switch of the substitute operator: s/^(\S+)/($tmp = $1) =~ tr#a-z#A-Z#, $tmp/e although in this case, it runs more slowly than does the previous example. 4.22) Can I use Perl regular expressions to match balanced text? No, or at least, not by the themselves. Regexps just aren't powerful enough. Although Perl's patterns aren't strictly regular because they do backreferencing (the \1 notation), you still can't do it. You need to employ auxiliary logic. A simple approach would involve keeping a bit of state around, something vaguely like this (although we don't handle patterns on the same line): while(<>) { if (/pat1/) { if ($inpat++ > 0) { warn "already saw pat1" } redo; } if (/pat2/) { if (--$inpat < 0) { warn "never saw pat1" } redo; } } A rather more elaborate subroutine to pull out balanced and possibly nested single chars, like ` and ', { and }, or ( and ) can be found on convex.com in /pub/perl/scripts/pull_quotes. 4.23) What does it mean that regexps are greedy? How can I get around it? The basic idea behind regexps being greedy is that they will match the maximum amount of data that they can, sometimes resulting in incorrect or strange answers. For example, I recently came across something like this: $_="this (is) an (example) of multiple parens"; while ( m#\((.*)\)#g ) { print "$1\n"; } This code was supposed to match everything between a set of parentheses. The expected output was: is example However, the backreference ($1) ended up containing "is) an (example", clearly not what was intended. In perl4, the way to stop this from happening is to use a negated group. If the above example is rewritten as follows, the results are correct: while ( m#\(([^)]*)\)#g ) { In perl5 there is a new minimal matching metacharacter, '?'. This character is added to the normal metacharacters to modify their behaviour, such as "*?", "+?", or even "??". The example would now be written in the following style: while (m#\((.*?)\)#g ) Hint: This new operator leads to a very elegant method of stripping comments from C code: s:/\*.*?\*/::gs 4.24) How do I use a regular expression to strip C style comments from a file? Since we're talking about how to strip comments under perl5, now is a good time to talk about doing it in perl4. The easiest way to strip comments in perl4 is to transform the comment close (*/) into something that can't be in the string, or is at least extremely unlikely to be in the string. I find \256 (the registered or reserved sign, an R inside a circle) is fairly unlikely to be used and is easy to remember. So, our code looks something like this: s:\*/:\256:g; # Change all */ to circled R s:/\*[^\256]*\256::g; # Remove everything from \* to circled R print; To ensure that you correctly handle multi-line comments, don't forget to set $* to 1, informing perl that it should do multi-line pattern matching. [Untested changes. If it's wrong or you don't understand it, check with Jeff. If it's wrong, let me know so I can change it. ] Jeff Friedl* suggests that the above solution is incorrect. He says it will fail on imbedded comments and function proto-typing as well as on comments that are part of strings. The following regexp should handle everything: $/ = undef; $_ = <>; s#/\*[^*]*\*+([^/*][^*]*\*+)*/|([^/"']*("[^"\\]*(\\[\d\D][^"\\]*)*"[^/ "']*|'[^ '\\]*(\\[\d\D][^'\\]*)*'[^/"']*|/+[^*/][^/"']*)*)#$2#g; print; 4.25) Why doesn't "local($foo) = ;" work right? Well, it does. The thing to remember is that local() provides an array context, and that the syntax in an array context will read all the lines in a file. To work around this, use: local($foo); $foo = ; You can use the scalar() operator to cast the expression into a scalar context: local($foo) = scalar(); 4.26) How can I detect keyboard input without reading it? You should check out the Frequently Asked Questions list in comp.unix.* for things like this: the answer is essentially the same. It's very system dependent. Here's one solution that works on BSD systems: sub key_ready { local($rin, $nfd); vec($rin, fileno(STDIN), 1) = 1; return $nfd = select($rin,undef,undef,0); } 4.27) How can I read a single character from the keyboard under UNIX and DOS? A closely related question to the no-echo question below is how to input a single character from the keyboard. Again, this is a system dependent operation. The following code may or may not help you. It should work on both SysV and BSD flavors of UNIX: $BSD = -f '/vmunix'; if ($BSD) { system "stty cbreak /dev/tty 2>&1"; } else { system "stty", '-icanon', system "stty", 'eol', "\001"; } $key = getc(STDIN); if ($BSD) { system "stty -cbreak /dev/tty 2>&1"; } else { system "stty", 'icanon'; system "stty", 'eol', '^@'; # ascii null } print "\n"; You could also handle the stty operations yourself for speed if you're going to be doing a lot of them. This code works to toggle cbreak and echo modes on a BSD system: sub set_cbreak { # &set_cbreak(1) or &set_cbreak(0) local($on) = $_[0]; local($sgttyb,@ary); require 'sys/ioctl.ph'; $sgttyb_t = 'C4 S' unless $sgttyb_t; # c2ph: &sgttyb'typedef() ioctl(STDIN,&TIOCGETP,$sgttyb) || die "Can't ioctl TIOCGETP: $!"; @ary = unpack($sgttyb_t,$sgttyb); if ($on) { $ary[4] |= &CBREAK; $ary[4] &= ~&ECHO; } else { $ary[4] &= ~&CBREAK; $ary[4] |= &ECHO; } $sgttyb = pack($sgttyb_t,@ary); ioctl(STDIN,&TIOCSETP,$sgttyb) || die "Can't ioctl TIOCSETP: $!"; } Note that this is one of the few times you actually want to use the getc() function; it's in general way too expensive to call for normal I/O. Normally, you just use the syntax, or perhaps the read() or sysread() functions. For perspectives on more portable solutions, use anon ftp to retrieve the file /pub/perl/info/keypress from convex.com. For DOS systems, Dan Carson reports: To put the PC in "raw" mode, use ioctl with some magic numbers gleaned from msdos.c (Perl source file) and Ralf Brown's interrupt list (comes across the net every so often): $old_ioctl = ioctl(STDIN,0,0); # Gets device info $old_ioctl &= 0xff; ioctl(STDIN,1,$old_ioctl | 32); # Writes it back, setting bit 5 Then to read a single character: sysread(STDIN,$c,1); # Read a single character And to put the PC back to "cooked" mode: ioctl(STDIN,1,$old_ioctl); # Sets it back to cooked mode. So now you have $c. If ord($c) == 0, you have a two byte code, which means you hit a special key. Read another byte (sysread(STDIN,$c,1)), and that value tells you what combination it was according to this table: # PC 2-byte keycodes = ^@ + the following: # HEX KEYS # --- ---- # 0F SHF TAB # 10-19 ALT QWERTYUIOP # 1E-26 ALT ASDFGHJKL # 2C-32 ALT ZXCVBNM # 3B-44 F1-F10 # 47-49 HOME,UP,PgUp # 4B LEFT # 4D RIGHT # 4F-53 END,DOWN,PgDn,Ins,Del # 54-5D SHF F1-F10 # 5E-67 CTR F1-F10 # 68-71 ALT F1-F10 # 73-77 CTR LEFT,RIGHT,END,PgDn,HOME # 78-83 ALT 1234567890-= # 84 CTR PgUp This is all trial and error I did a long time ago, I hope I'm reading the file that worked. 4.28) How can I get input from the keyboard without it echoing to the screen? Terminal echoing is generally handled directly by the shell. Therefore, there is no direct way in perl to turn echoing on and off. However, you can call the command "stty [-]echo". The following will allow you to accept input without it being echoed to the screen, for example as a way to accept passwords (error checking deleted for brevity): print "Please enter your password: "; system("stty -echo"); chop($password=); print "\n"; system("stty echo"); 4.29) Is there any easy way to strip blank space from the beginning/end of a string? Yes, there is. Using the substitution command, you can match the blanks and replace it with nothing. For example, if you have the string " String " you can use this: $_ = " String "; print ":$_:\n"; # OUTPUT: ": String :" s/^\s*//; print ":$_:\n"; # OUTPUT: ":String :" s/\s*$//; print ":$_:\n"; # OUTPUT: ":String:" Unfortunately, there is no simple single statement that will strip whitespace from both the front and the back in perl4. However, in perl5 you should be able to say: s/\s*(.*?)\s*$/$1/; Stephen P Potter spp@vx.com Varimetrix Corporation 2350 Commerce Park Drive, Suite 4 Palm Bay, FL 32905 (407) 676-3222 CAD/CAM/CAE/Software ÿ@SUBJECT:comp.lang.perl FAQ 5/5 - External Program Interaction úÿ(Continued from last message) grep ($_ eq 'a', keys %ary) is FALSE See, the whole entry is gone! 5.9) Why don't backticks work as they do in shells? Several reason. One is because backticks do not interpolate within double quotes in Perl as they do in shells. Let's look at two common mistakes: $foo = "$bar is `wc $file`"; # WRONG This should have been: $foo = "$bar is " . `wc $file`; But you'll have an extra newline you might not expect. This does not work as expected: $back = `pwd`; chdir($somewhere); chdir($back); # WRONG Because backticks do not automatically eat trailing or embedded newlines. The chop() function will remove the last character from a string. This should have been: chop($back = `pwd`); chdir($somewhere); chdir($back); You should also be aware that while in the shells, embedding single quotes will protect variables, in Perl, you'll need to escape the dollar signs. Shell: foo=`cmd 'safe $dollar'` Perl: $foo=`cmd 'safe \$dollar'`; 5.10) How come my converted awk/sed/sh script runs more slowly in Perl? The natural way to program in those languages may not make for the fastest Perl code. Notably, the awk-to-perl translator produces sub- optimal code; see the a2p man page for tweaks you can make. Two of Perl's strongest points are its associative arrays and its regular expressions. They can dramatically speed up your code when applied properly. Recasting your code to use them can help a lot. How complex are your regexps? Deeply nested sub-expressions with {n,m} or * operators can take a very long time to compute. Don't use ()'s unless you really need them. Anchor your string to the front if you can. Something like this: next unless /^.*%.*$/; runs more slowly than the equivalent: next unless /%/; Note that this: next if /Mon/; next if /Tue/; next if /Wed/; next if /Thu/; next if /Fri/; runs faster than this: next if /Mon/ || /Tue/ || /Wed/ || /Thu/ || /Fri/; which in turn runs faster than this: next if /Mon|Tue|Wed|Thu|Fri/; which runs *much* faster than: next if /(Mon|Tue|Wed|Thu|Fri)/; There's no need to use /^.*foo.*$/ when /foo/ will do. Remember that a printf costs more than a simple print. Don't split() every line if you don't have to. Another thing to look at is your loops. Are you iterating through indexed arrays rather than just putting everything into a hashed array? For example, @list = ('abc', 'def', 'ghi', 'jkl', 'mno', 'pqr', 'stv'); for $i ($[ .. $#list) { if ($pattern eq $list[$i]) { $found++; } } First of all, it would be faster to use Perl's foreach mechanism instead of using subscripts: foreach $elt (@list) { if ($pattern eq $elt) { $found++; } } Better yet, this could be sped up dramatically by placing the whole thing in an associative array like this: %list = ('abc', 1, 'def', 1, 'ghi', 1, 'jkl', 1, 'mno', 1, 'pqr', 1, 'stv', 1 ); $found += $list{$pattern}; (but put the %list assignment outside of your input loop.) You should also look at variables in regular expressions, which is expensive. If the variable to be interpolated doesn't change over the life of the process, use the /o modifier to tell Perl to compile the regexp only once, like this: for $i (1..100) { if (/$foo/o) { &some_func($i); } } Finally, if you have a bunch of patterns in a list that you'd like to compare against, instead of doing this: @pats = ('_get.*', 'bogus', '_read', '.*exit', '_write'); foreach $pat (@pats) { if ( $name =~ /^$pat$/ ) { &some_func(); last; } } If you build your code and then eval it, it will be much faster. For example: @pats = ('_get.*', 'bogus', '_read', '.*exit', '_write'); $code = <) { study; EOS foreach $pat (@pats) { $code .= <) { # or else the other way; run the cmd open(CMD, "| some_cmd its_args > a_file"); while ($condition) { print CMD "some output\n"; # other code deleted } close CMD || warn "cmd exited $?"; # now read the file open(FILE,"a_file"); while () { If you have ptys, you could arrange to run the command on a pty and avoid the deadlock problem. See the chat2.pl package in the distributed library for ways to do this. At the risk of deadlock, it is theoretically possible to use a fork, two pipe calls, and an exec to manually set up the two-way pipe. (BSD system may use socketpair() in place of the two pipes, but this is not as portable.) The open2 library function distributed with the current perl release will do this for you. It assumes it's going to talk to something like adb, both writing to it and reading from it. This is presumably safe because you "know" that commands like adb will read a line at a time and output a line at a time. Programs like sort that read their entire input stream first, however, are quite apt to cause deadlock. There's also an open3.pl library that handles this for stderr as well. 5.15) How can I capture STDERR from an external command? There are three basic ways of running external commands: system $cmd; $output = `$cmd`; open (PIPE, "cmd |"); In the first case, both STDOUT and STDERR will go the same place as the script's versions of these, unless redirected. You can always put them where you want them and then read them back when the system returns. In the second and third cases, you are reading the STDOUT *only* of your command. If you would like to have merged STDOUT and STDERR, you can use shell file-descriptor redirection to dup STDERR to STDOUT: $output = `$cmd 2>&1`; open (PIPE, "cmd 2>&1 |"); Another possibility is to run STDERR into a file and read the file later, as in $output = `$cmd 2>some_file`; open (PIPE, "cmd 2>some_file |"); Here's a way to read from both of them and know which descriptor you got each line from. The trick is to pipe only STDERR through sed, which then marks each of its lines, and then sends that back into a merged STDOUT/STDERR stream, from which your Perl program then reads a line at a time: open (CMD, "cmd args | sed 's/^/STDOUT:/' |"); while () { if (s/^STDOUT://) { print "line from stdout: ", $_; } else { print "line from stdeff: ", $_; } } Be apprised that you *must* use Bourne shell redirection syntax in backticks, not csh! For details on how lucky you are that perl's system() and backtick and pipe opens all use Bourne shell, fetch the file from convex.com called /pub/csh.whynot -- and you'll be glad that perl's shell interface is the Bourne shell. There's an &open3 routine out there which was merged with &open2 in perl5 production. 5.16) Why doesn't open return an error when a pipe open fails? These statements: open(TOPIPE, "|bogus_command") || die ... open(FROMPIPE, "bogus_command|") || die ... will not fail just for lack of the bogus_command. They'll only fail if the fork to run them fails, which is seldom the problem. If you're writing to the TOPIPE, you'll get a SIGPIPE if the child exits prematurely or doesn't run. If you are reading from the FROMPIPE, you need to check the close() to see what happened. If you want an answer sooner than pipe buffering might otherwise afford you, you can do something like this: $kid = open (PIPE, "bogus_command |"); # XXX: check defined($kid) (kill 0, $kid) || die "bogus_command failed"; This works fine if bogus_command doesn't have shell metas in it, but if it does, the shell may well not have exited before the kill 0. You could always introduce a delay: $kid = open (PIPE, "bogus_command ; but that's pretty iffy. A better way is to do the translation yourself, as in: $filename =~ s#^~(\w+)(/.*)?$#(getpwnam($1))[7].$2#e; More robust and efficient versions that checked for error conditions, handed simple ~/blah notation, and cached lookups are all reasonable enhancements. 5.19) How can I convert my shell script to Perl? Larry's standard answer is to send it through the shell to perl filter, otherwise known at tchrist@perl.com. Contrary to popular belief, Tom Christiansen isn't a real person. He is actually a highly advanced artificial intelligence experiment written by a graduate student at the University of Colorado. Some of the earlier tasks he was programmed to perform included: * monitor comp.lang.perl and collect statistics on which questions were asked with which frequency and to respond to them with stock answers. Tom's programming has since outgrown this paltry task, and it has been assigned to an undergraduate student from the University of Florida. After all, we all know that student from UF aren't able to do much more than documentation anyway. ;-) * convert shell programs to perl programs Actually, there is no automatic machine translator. Even if there were, you wouldn't gain a lot, as most of the external programs would still get called. It's the same problem as blind translation into C: you're still apt to be bogged down by exec()s. You have to analyze the dataflow and algorithm and rethink it for optimal speedup. It's úÿ not uncommon to see one, two, or even three orders of magnitude of speed difference between the brute-force and the recoded approaches. 5.20) Can I use Perl to run a telnet or ftp session? Sure, you can connect directly to them using sockets, or you can run a session on a pty. In either case, Randal's chat2 package, which is distributed with the perl source, will come in handly. It address much the same problem space as Don Libes's expect package does. Two examples of using managing an ftp session using chat2 can be found on convex.com in /pub/perl/scripts/ftp-chat2.shar . Caveat lector: chat2 is documented only by example, may not run on System V systems, and is subtly machine dependent both in its ideas of networking and in pseudottys. Randal also has code showing an example socket session for handling the telnet protocol. You might nudge him for a copy. Gene Spafford* has a nice ftp library package that will help with ftp. 5.21) Why do I somestimes get an "Arguments too long" when I use <*>? As of perl4.036, there is a certain amount of globbing that is passed out to the shell and not handled internally. The following code (which will, roughly, emulate "chmod 0644 *") while (<*>) { chmod 0644, $_; } is the equivalent of open(FOO, "echo * | tr -s ' \t\r\f' '\\012\\012\\012\\012'|"); while () { chop; chmod 0644, $_; } Until globbing is built into Perl, you will need to use some form of non-globbing work around. Something like the following will work: opendir(DIR,'.'); chmod 0644, grep(/\.c$/, readdir(DIR)); closedir(DIR); This example is taken directly from "Programming Perl" page 78. If you've installed tcsh as /bin/csh, you'll never have this problem. 5.22) How do I do a "tail -f" in Perl? Larry says that the solution is to put a call to seek in yourself. First try seek(GWFILE, 0, 1); If that doesn't work (depends on your stdio implementation), then you need something more like this: for (;;) { for ($curpos = tell(GWFILE); $_ = ; $curpos = tell(GWFILE)) { # search for some stuff and put it into files } sleep for a while seek(GWFILE, $curpos, 0); } 5.23) Is there a way to hide perl's command line from programs such as "ps"? Generally speaking, if you need to do this you're either using poor programming practices or are far too paranoid for your own good. If you need to do this to hide a password being entered on the command line, recode the program to read the password from a file or to prompt for it. (see question 4.24) Typing a password on the command line is inherently insecure as anyone can look over your shoulder to see it. If you feel you really must overwrite the command line and hide it, you can assign to the variable "$0". For example: #!/usr/local/bin/perl $0 = "Hidden from prying eyes"; open(PS, "ps") || die "Can't PS: $!"; while () { next unless m/$$/; print } It should be noted that some OSes, like Solaris 2.X, read directly from the kernel information, instead of from the program's stack, and hence don't allow you to change the command line. Stephen P Potter spp@vx.com Varimetrix Corporation 2350 Commerce Park Drive, Suite 4 Palm Bay, FL 32905 (407) 676-3222 CAD/CAM/CAE/Software ÿ@SUBJECT:comp.lang.perl FAQ 5/5 - External Program Interaction Message-ID: Path: ns.channel1.com!wizard.pn.com!Germany.EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net spool.mu.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!faqserv From: spp@vx.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.perl,comp.answers,news.answers Subject: comp.lang.perl FAQ 5/5 - External Program Interaction Supersedes: Followup-To: poster Date: 30 Nov 1994 09:40:48 GMT Organization: none Lines: 883 Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU Distribution: world Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: bloom-picayune.mit.edu X-Last-Updated: 1994/11/14 Originator: faqserv@bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU Xref: ns.channel1.com comp.lang.perl:39240 comp.answers:8357 news.answers:32284 Archive-name: perl-faq/part5 Version: $Id: part5,v 2.2 1994/11/07 18:06:59 spp Exp spp $ Posting-Frequency: bi-weekly This posting contains answers to the following questions about Array, Shell and External Program Interactions with Perl: 5.1) What is the difference between $array[1] and @array[1]? Always make sure to use a $ for single values and @ for multiple ones. Thus element 2 of the @foo array is accessed as $foo[2], not @foo[2], which is a list of length one (not a scalar), and is a fairly common novice mistake. Sometimes you can get by with @foo[2], but it's not really doing what you think it's doing for the reason you think it's doing it, which means one of these days, you'll shoot yourself in the foot; ponder for a moment what these will really do: @foo[0] = `cmd args`; @foo[2] = ; Just always say $foo[2] and you'll be happier. This may seem confusing, but try to think of it this way: you use the character of the type which you *want back*. You could use @foo[1..3] for a slice of three elements of @foo, or even @foo{A,B,C} for a slice of of %foo. This is the same as using ($foo[1], $foo[2], $foo[3]) and ($foo{A}, $foo{B}, $foo{C}) respectively. In fact, you can even use lists to subscript arrays and pull out more lists, like @foo[@bar] or @foo{@bar}, where @bar is in both cases presumably a list of subscripts. 5.2) How can I make an array of arrays or other recursive data types? In Perl5, it's quite easy to declare these things. For example @A = ( [ 'ww' .. 'xx' ], [ 'xx' .. 'yy' ], [ 'yy' .. 'zz' ], [ 'zz' .. 'zzz' ], ); And now reference $A[2]->[0] to pull out "yy". These may also nest and mix with tables: %T = ( key0, { k0, v0, k1, v1 }, key1, { k2, v2, k3, v3 }, key2, { k2, v2, k3, [ 0, 'a' .. 'z' ] }, ); Allowing you to reference $T{key2}->{k3}->[3] to pull out 'c'. Perl4 is infinitely more difficult. Remember that Perl[0..4] isn't about nested data structures. It's about flat ones, so if you're trying to do this, you may be going about it the wrong way or using the wrong tools. You might try parallel arrays with common subscripts. But if you're bound and determined, you can use the multi- dimensional array emulation of $a{'x','y','z'}, or you can make an array of names of arrays and eval it. For example, if @name contains a list of names of arrays, you can get at a the j-th element of the i-th array like so: $ary = $name[$i]; $val = eval "\$$ary[$j]"; or in one line $val = eval "\$$name[$i][\$j]"; You could also use the type-globbing syntax to make an array of *name values, which will be more efficient than eval. Here @name hold a list of pointers, which we'll have to dereference through a temporary variable. For example: { local(*ary) = $name[$i]; $val = $ary[$j]; } In fact, you can use this method to make arbitrarily nested data structures. You really have to want to do this kind of thing badly to go this far, however, as it is notationally cumbersome. Let's assume you just simply *have* to have an array of arrays of arrays. What you do is make an array of pointers to arrays of pointers, where pointers are *name values described above. You initialize the outermost array normally, and then you build up your pointers from there. For example: @w = ( 'ww' .. 'xx' ); @x = ( 'xx' .. 'yy' ); @y = ( 'yy' .. 'zz' ); @z = ( 'zz' .. 'zzz' ); @ww = reverse @w; @xx = reverse @x; @yy = reverse @y; @zz = reverse @z; Now make a couple of arrays of pointers to these: @A = ( *w, *x, *y, *z ); @B = ( *ww, *xx, *yy, *zz ); And finally make an array of pointers to these arrays: @AAA = ( *A, *B ); To access an element, such as AAA[i][j][k], you must do this: local(*foo) = $AAA[$i]; local(*bar) = $foo[$j]; $answer = $bar[$k]; Similar manipulations on associative arrays are also feasible. You could take a look at recurse.pl package posted by Felix Lee*, which lets you simulate vectors and tables (lists and associative arrays) by using type glob references and some pretty serious wizardry. In C, you're used to creating recursive datatypes for operations like recursive decent parsing or tree traversal. In Perl, these algorithms are best implemented using associative arrays. Take an array called %parent, and build up pointers such that $parent{$person} is the name of that person's parent. Make sure you remember that $parent{'adam'} is 'adam'. :-) With a little care, this approach can be used to implement general graph traversal algorithms as well. 5.3) How do I make an array of structures containing various data types? The best way to do this is to use an associative array to model your structure, then either a regular array (AKA list) or another associative array (AKA hash, table, or hash table) to store it. %foo = ( 'field1' => "value1", 'field2' => "value2", 'field3' => "value3", ... ); ... @all = ( \%foo, \%bar, ... ); print $all[0]{'field1'}; Or even @all = ( { 'field1' => "value1", 'field2' => "value2", 'field3' => "value3", ... }, { 'field1' => "value1", 'field2' => "value2", 'field3' => "value3", ... }, ... ) See perlref(1). 5.4) How can I extract just the unique elements of an array? There are several possible ways, depending on whether the array is ordered and you wish to preserve the ordering. a) If @in is sorted, and you want @out to be sorted: $prev = 'nonesuch'; @out = grep($_ ne $prev && (($prev) = $_), @in); This is nice in that it doesn't use much extra memory, simulating uniq's behavior of removing only adjacent duplicates. b) If you don't know whether @in is sorted: undef %saw; @out = grep(!$saw{$_}++, @in); c) Like (b), but @in contains only small integers: @out = grep(!$saw[$_]++, @in); d) A way to do (b) without any loops or greps: undef %saw; @saw{@in} = (); @out = sort keys %saw; # remove sort if undesired e) Like (d), but @in contains only small positive integers: undef @ary; @ary[@in] = @in; @out = sort @ary; 5.5) How can I tell whether an array contains a certain element? There are several ways to approach this. If you are going to make this query many times and the values are arbitrary strings, the fastest way is probably to invert the original array and keep an associative array lying about whose keys are the first array's values. @blues = ('turquoise', 'teal', 'lapis lazuli'); undef %is_blue; for (@blues) { $is_blue{$_} = 1; } Now you can check whether $is_blue{$some_color}. It might have been a good idea to keep the blues all in an assoc array in the first place. If the values are all small integers, you could use a simple indexed array. This kind of an array will take up less space: @primes = (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31); undef @is_tiny_prime; for (@primes) { $is_tiny_prime[$_] = 1; } Now you check whether $is_tiny_prime[$some_number]. If the values in question are integers instead of strings, you can save quite a lot of space by using bit strings instead: @articles = ( 1..10, 150..2000, 2017 ); undef $read; grep (vec($read,$_,1) = 1, @articles); Now check whether vec($read,$n,1) is true for some $n. 5.6) How do I sort an associative array by value instead of by key? You have to declare a sort subroutine to do this, or use an inline function. Let's assume you want an ASCII sort on the values of the associative array %ary. You could do so this way: foreach $key (sort by_value keys %ary) { print $key, '=', $ary{$key}, "\n"; } sub by_value { $ary{$a} cmp $ary{$b}; } If you wanted a descending numeric sort, you could do this: sub by_value { $ary{$b} <=> $ary{$a}; } You can also inline your sort function, like this, at least if you have a relatively recent patchlevel of perl4 or are running perl5: foreach $key ( sort { $ary{$b} <=> $ary{$a} } keys %ary ) { print $key, '=', $ary{$key}, "\n"; } If you wanted a function that didn't have the array name hard- wired into it, you could so this: foreach $key (&sort_by_value(*ary)) { print $key, '=', $ary{$key}, "\n"; } sub sort_by_value { local(*x) = @_; sub _by_value { $x{$a} cmp $x{$b}; } sort _by_value keys %x; } If you want neither an alphabetic nor a numeric sort, then you'll have to code in your own logic instead of relying on the built-in signed comparison operators "cmp" and "<=>". Note that if you're sorting on just a part of the value, such as a piece you might extract via split, unpack, pattern-matching, or substr, then rather than performing that operation inside your sort routine on each call to it, it is significantly more efficient to build a parallel array of just those portions you're sorting on, sort the indices of this parallel array, and then to subscript your original array using the newly sorted indices. This method works on both regular and associative arrays, since both @ary[@idx] and @ary{@idx} make sense. See page 245 in the Camel Book on "Sorting an Array by a Computable Field" for a simple example of this. 5.7) How can I know how many entries are in an associative array? While the number of elements in a @foobar array is simply @foobar when used in a scalar, you can't figure out how many elements are in an associative array in an analogous fashion. That's because %foobar in a scalar context returns the ratio (as a string) of number of buckets filled versus the number allocated. For example, scalar(%ENV) might return "20/32". While perl could in theory keep a count, this would break down on associative arrays that have been bound to dbm files. However, while you can't get a count this way, one thing you *can* use it for is to determine whether there are any elements whatsoever in the array, since "if (%table)" is guaranteed to be false if nothing has ever been stored in it. As of perl4.035, you can says $count = keys %ARRAY; keys() when used in a scalar context will return the number of keys, rather than the keys themselves. 5.8) What's the difference between "delete" and "undef" with %arrays? Pictures help... here's the %ary table: keys values +------+------+ | a | 3 | | x | 7 | | d | 0 | | e | 2 | +------+------+ And these conditions hold $ary{'a'} is true $ary{'d'} is false defined $ary{'d'} is true defined $ary{'a'} is true exists $ary{'a'} is true (perl5 only) grep ($_ eq 'a', keys %ary) is true If you now say undef $ary{'a'} your table now reads: keys values +------+------+ | a | undef| | x | 7 | | d | 0 | | e | 2 | +------+------+ and these conditions now hold; changes in caps: $ary{'a'} is FALSE $ary{'d'} is false defined $ary{'d'} is true defined $ary{'a'} is FALSE exists $ary{'a'} is true (perl5 only) grep ($_ eq 'a', keys %ary) is true Notice the last two: you have an undef value, but a defined key! Now, consider this: delete $ary{'a'} your table now reads: keys values +------+------+ | x | 7 | | d | 0 | | e | 2 | +------+------+ and these conditions now hold; changes in caps: $ary{'a'} is false $ary{'d'} is false defined $ary{'d'} is true defined $ary{'a'} is false exists $ary{'a'} is FALSE (perl5 only)