Thu, 11 Apr 1996 17:09:41 comp.dcom.modems Thread 10 of 423 Lines 16 Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Sportster13 Responses digger@ici.net The Internet Connection On Thu, 11 Apr 1996 01:16:35 -0400, "Duane T. Williams" wrote: Duane, I got the 28.8/33.6 Sportster and I'm really happy with it. First, AOL has a history of buggy connections (go to their Zoom page for example), And it was my understanding that if you wanted to connx at anything OVER 14.4 you had to connect to their 6$ an hour line. Also, you said that you installed your friends Sportster and it worked just fine so I wouldn't generalize and say that All Sportsters should be avoided. If you want to experience lack of tech support buy a Zoom. (No don't I wouldn't wish that on anyone) I'm sure you'll get some help from these folks and you'll love your Sportster. Thread 10 of 423 (page 2): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Sportster and C Jean GPF-The Microsoft Award for Programming Excellence Sat, 13 Apr 1996 00:49:01 comp.dcom.modems Thread 10 of 423 Lines 13 Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: SportsterRespno 1 of 13 rmuns@primenet.com Reuben Muns at Primenet Services for the Internet digger@ici.net wrote: >...... Also, >you said that you installed your friends Sportster and it worked just >fine so I wouldn't generalize and say that All Sportsters should be >avoided. If you would read the Subject line and a little of the article to which you are responding, you will find he is *not* generalizing that "All Sportsters" should be avoided -- just the 33.6 variety. Reuben Sat, 13 Apr 1996 10:46:07 comp.dcom.modems Thread 10 of 423 Lines 18 Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: SportsterRespno 2 of 13 shb@vnet.net Si Ballenger at maybe later... "Duane T. Williams" wrote: >I have had a great deal of trouble with my new USR Sportster 33.6 modem >for my Mac. The problem is basically that it won't maintain a reliable >connection for very long -- 30 minutes if I'm lucky and then it drops >the connection. How do I know it's my modem? Well, I borrowed a USR >Sportster 28.8 modem from a friend and connected it to my Mac exactly as >my modem was connected. The 28.8 modem worked just fine. I tested it >for a week or more, leaving myself connected for 2 days at a time. I >concluded that there was probably nothing wrong with my computer's >connection to the modem, nor with my phone line. My Sportster 33.6 >modem is not entirely broken. It seems to work normally -- for a while. I think in the past that there may have been some problems with these modems heating up. Experiment and see if it the connection Thread 10 of 423, Resp 2/13 (page 2): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spor problem is modem temperature dependent. Other readers may have more info on this type of problem. You might be able to get some past info by doing a search at the deja vue news site. Mon, 15 Apr 1996 11:54:00 comp.dcom.modems Thread 10 of 423 Lines 6 Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: SportsterRespno 3 of 13 JNavas@NavasGrp.com John Navas at The Navas Group of Dublin, CA, USA And another urban legend get started... -- Best regards, John mailto:JNavas@NavasGrp.com http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/ 28800 Modem FAQ: http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/modem/faq.html Mon, 15 Apr 1996 22:13:37 comp.dcom.modems Thread 10 of 423 Lines 71 Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: SportsterRespno 4 of 13 bubba@insync.net Bill Garfield at Associated Technical Consultants JNavas@NavasGrp.com (John Navas) wrote: >And another urban legend get started... Coming from someone who also pooh-pooh'd the "Spiral Death legend", I'd say you of all people would know better by now than to make a statement like that. You're standing on some awfully shaky ground, John. FACT: The V34 Sportster shipping today and on the dealer's shelves today is not the same V34 Sportster the magazine reviewers and testing labs spoke so highly of last year. FACT: This "new" V34 Sportster represents a near total redesign of Thread 10 of 423, Resp 4/13 (page 2): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spor of the controller circuitry. Gone is the 80186 CPU. CPU functions are now incorporated into the DSP, ergo the 92 Mhz clock speed. That's not a bad plan, but the design is only 5-6 months old. Remember the point we were at 5-6 months into the original (1994) design? SPECULATION: This "new" V34 Sportster appears to have been quietly slipstreamed into the distribution channel late last year, or very early this year. FACT: There are "new" V34 Sportsters (units of the new design) in the hands of users right now with firmware eprom dates of 09-19-95, 10-13-95, 10-18-95, 01-11-96 and 03-04-96. There's also been a firmware date of 02-07-96 reported (but unconfirmed). OBSERVATION: For a unit that's NOT experiencing some pretty serious Thread 10 of 423, Resp 4/13 (page 3): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spor problems, there certainly seem to be a virtual machine- gun barrage of firmware versions in circulation. That alone characterizes a product in the immature stage of its life, IMO. FACT: Current production V34 Sportsters in the distribution channel today no longer have their firmware eprom socketed. It's permanently SOLDERED in. Yes, soldered. FACT: Internal V34 Sportsters (00084002 series) with soldered-in eproms are on the store shelves right now in CompUSA stores in Houston. FACT: These internals with non-socketed proms are pictured on the package as clearly having a socketed eprom. Things aren't always what they seem. Thread 10 of 423, Resp 4/13 (page 4): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spor SUPPOSITION: Owners of modems with soldered-in eproms may well find it mighty inconvenient to get that sorely needed maintenance release load of firmware. Obviously future firmware upgrades will have to be handled at the factory. OBSERVATION: The "new" V34 Sportsters of new design do not appear to be as funtionally stable as their prior design counterparts. (Based on first-hand experience) OBSERVATION: The relative noise level in the Compuserve USR forum and FidoNet, RIME, etc. USR user echoes tend to support the previous observation. Far too many users are reporting far too many -similar- symptoms of product dysfunction for it to be mere coincidence. Thread 10 of 423, Resp 4/13 (page 5): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spor Urban legend, your ass. =================================================== 7-Year-Old Jessica Dubroff would be alive today if her parents had only learned to say, "No." =================================================== Tue, 16 Apr 1996 01:34:18 comp.dcom.modems Thread 10 of 423 Lines 21 Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: SportsterRespno 5 of 13 Rigor@clever.net Matt Fox at Best Internet Communications In article <3172fd50.3546264@news.insync.net>, bubba@insync.net says... > >Urban legend, your ass. > look at all the modems that have soldered in rockwell datapumps... > > >=================================================== > 7-Year-Old Jessica Dubroff would be alive today > if her parents had only learned to say, "No." Thread 10 of 423, Resp 5/13 (page 2): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spor >=================================================== is that the plane girl?? its been proven that she wasnt flying the plane when it crashed and it was overloaded so you prolly might want to revise your signature file Tue, 16 Apr 1996 10:04:41 comp.dcom.modems Thread 10 of 423 Lines 29 Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: SportsterRespno 6 of 13 LUKEROBE@BA.isu.edu Idaho State University bubba@insync.net (Bill Garfield) wrote: >JNavas@NavasGrp.com (John Navas) wrote: > >>And another urban legend get started... > >Coming from someone who also pooh-pooh'd the "Spiral Death legend", >I'd say you of all people would know better by now than to make a >statement like that. You're standing on some awfully shaky ground, >John. Hey, PLEASE put that axe away . I think that the point f Thread 10 of 423, Resp 6/13 (page 2): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spor John's "Urban Legend" stance is valid. Yes, sometimes USR's have problems (jut like EVERY modem manufacturer), but there are many Sportster users who have hadd performance and no problems whatsoever. It just strikes me as ironic that I have seen 4-5 people who were about to RMA r Sportsters to USR, when the real problem was that the messed up doing an "ATY11d typed "ATY1", rendering their modems useless to software configured for hardware flow control. Problems cannot always be blamed on USR. ;) Rob Thread 10 of 423, Resp 6/13 (page 3): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spor Tue, 16 Apr 1996 11:20:09 comp.dcom.modems Thread 10 of 423 Lines 29 Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: SportsterRespno 7 of 13 wpoupore@mail.inforamp.net Bill Poupore at Ubiquitous Systems In article <3172fd50.3546264@news.insync.net>, bubba@insync.net wrote: >FACT: There are "new" V34 Sportsters (units of the new design) in the > hands of users right now with firmware eprom dates of 09-19-95, > 10-13-95, 10-18-95, 01-11-96 and 03-04-96. There's also been a > firmware date of 02-07-96 reported (but unconfirmed). What are the latest dates for the ROM chip on the "old " Sportster v.34, ie the one with the socketed ROM chip? The Canadian distributor says its 4/18/95, but I've seen some reports here of 8/29/95. Can others confirm that the 8/29/95 date is correct for the old v.34 Sportster? I just had my whole modem replaced and its working just as poorly. Won't Thread 10 of 423, Resp 7/13 (page 2): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spor connect to other brands, drops the connection, etc. It can't even connect cleanly with another USR modem on a consistent basis. Are the V.34+ upgrades for the old Sportster trouble free? Will I get anything other than a new set of headaches for my money? -- ========================================================================= Bill Poupore Ubiquitous Systems Toronto, Ontario wpoupore@inforamp.net Tue, 16 Apr 1996 19:16:30 comp.dcom.modems Thread 10 of 423 Lines 34 Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: SportsterRespno 8 of 13 destarr@tir.com David Starr at The Internet Ramp On 16 Apr 1996 06:34:18 GMT, Rigor@clever.net (Matt Fox) wrote: --->In article <3172fd50.3546264@news.insync.net>, bubba@insync.net says... --->> --->>Urban legend, your ass. --->> ---> --->look at all the modems that have soldered in rockwell datapumps... ---> ---> ---> --->> --->> Thread 10 of 423, Resp 8/13 (page 2): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spor --->>=================================================== --->> 7-Year-Old Jessica Dubroff would be alive today --->> if her parents had only learned to say, "No." --->>=================================================== ---> ---> --->is that the plane girl?? its been proven that she wasnt flying the --->plane when it crashed and it was overloaded so you prolly might want --->to revise your signature file ---> If her parents had said "no", she wouldn't have been on that plane. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Thread 10 of 423, Resp 8/13 (page 3): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spor Professional Shop Rat 31 Years Experience Dave Starr Tue, 16 Apr 1996 19:20:15 comp.dcom.modems Thread 10 of 423 Lines 11 Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: SportsterRespno 9 of 13 mills@ultranet.com UltraNet Communications, Inc. All I can say is that I'm very glad I returned my "new" 33.6 sportster and got the suprasonic. I almost kept it figuring I'd get a new prom when they fix the fax and so-so connect speed problems, what a mistake that would of been. It was bad enough the sportster was not flashable, but to not even socket the thing is just plain crazy on a new design. Tue, 16 Apr 1996 20:19:40 comp.dcom.modems Thread 10 of 423 Lines 31 Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: SportsterRespno 10 of 13 bubba@insync.net Bill Garfield at Associated Technical Consultants wpoupore@mail.inforamp.net (Bill Poupore) wrote: > >What are the latest dates for the ROM chip on the "old " Sportster v.34, >ie the one with the socketed ROM chip? The Canadian distributor says its >4/18/95, but I've seen some reports here of 8/29/95. Can others confirm >that the 8/29/95 date is correct for the old v.34 Sportster? >I just had my whole modem replaced and its working just as poorly. Won't >connect to other brands, drops the connection, etc. It can't even connect >cleanly with another USR modem on a consistent basis. The previous model V34 Sportster has been essentially "stable" since the --More--(61%) [1386/2263] Message from Talk_Daemon@earth at 12:11 ... ntalk: connection requested by whiteboy@earth. ntalk: respond with: ntalk whiteboy@earth Thread 10 of 423, Resp 10/13 (page 2): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spo 04-18-95 code (which was the workaround fix for the Spiral Death bug). The 08-29-95 code merely adds 33.6 modulation compatibility. Your problematic connectivity issues sound like they could be phone line related. Have you thought of trying a "different" modem? Is it worth the cost to upgrade? Yeah probably, but don't look for much in the way of a noticeable performance boost unless you're connecting to a similar 33.6-capable modem on the other end. No, you'll likely not achieve 33.6, but two modems equipped with the new firmware do seem to achieve one level greater connect speed than previously.... not always but often. Your results will of course vary. =================================================== 7-Year-Old Jessica Dubroff would be alive today if her parents had only learned to say, "No." Thread 10 of 423, Resp 10/13 (page 3): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spo =================================================== Wed, 17 Apr 1996 10:55:47 comp.dcom.modems Thread 10 of 423 Lines 17 Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: SportsterRespno 11 of 13 m_c_0003@mtsu.edu Tommy Forrest-KE4PYM at Middle Tennessee State University On 16 Apr 1996, Matt Fox wrote: > In article <3172fd50.3546264@news.insync.net>, bubba@insync.net says... > > > >Urban legend, your ass. > > > > look at all the modems that have soldered in rockwell datapumps... > That would be the Si series. Id avoid those things like the plague. Email: m_c_0003@mtsu.edu - Tommy - KE4PYM or forrest_su@mtsu.edu Thread 10 of 423, Resp 11/13 (page 2): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spo http://www.mtsu.edu/~m_c_0003 Wed, 17 Apr 1996 15:53:28 comp.dcom.modems Thread 10 of 423 Lines 22 Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: SportsterRespno 12 of 13 an171@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Anthony Hill at The National Capital FreeNet Matt Fox (Rigor@clever.net) writes: > In article <3172fd50.3546264@news.insync.net>, bubba@insync.net says... >> >>Urban legend, your ass. >> > > look at all the modems that have soldered in rockwell datapumps... Not being able to change the datapump code is a bit of a disadvantage, but if you've had a chance to use a Rockwell based modem you'll notice that a LOT can be changed by simply changing the controller code, includinging working around most bugs in the datapump. But not being able to change ANY code at all without returning the modem to the Thread 10 of 423, Resp 12/13 (page 2): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spo factory can be a big problem. Unless the modem is VERY stable, soldered EPROMs are a VERY bad idea.. And from the looks of things in these message bases, the new model Sportsters are pretty fare from being very stable.. Anthony -- Anthony Hill | an171@FreeNet.Carleton.CA Thu, 18 Apr 1996 08:36:08 comp.dcom.modems Thread 10 of 423 Lines 42 Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: SportsterRespno 13 of 13 wpoupore@mail.inforamp.net Bill Poupore at Ubiquitous Systems In article <3174456c.977781@news.insync.net>, bubba@insync.net wrote: > >The previous model V34 Sportster has been essentially "stable" since the >04-18-95 code (which was the workaround fix for the Spiral Death bug). >The 08-29-95 code merely adds 33.6 modulation compatibility. Your >problematic connectivity issues sound like they could be phone line >related. Have you thought of trying a "different" modem? I think I've got the modem reset and working properly now. Too bad it didn't work that way when I got it back. No problem with my V.32 on this line and I don't know anyone else who has a V.34 modem -bunch of Luddites! The major problem now seems to be connecting to GVC v.34 modems. Unfortunately 3 of the four places I connect to on a daily basis use this Thread 10 of 423, Resp 13/13 (page 2): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spo modem. One of my ISPs uses this modem (my account expires soon:-). They claim the problem is all USR because there are no complaints about the GVC in this forum. Of course GVC is a Canadian brand and far fewer people use them and no major magazine has ever published a comparison to indicate how they actually compare. They are based on the Rockwell chipset, and apparently GVC has little if any of their own engineering expertise to work out any bugs that may be in the Rockwell chipset. Perhaps that says all. > >Is it worth the cost to upgrade? Yeah probably, but don't look for much >in the way of a noticeable performance boost unless you're connecting to >a similar 33.6-capable modem on the other end. My one non-GVC daily connection happens to be to an ISP with hundreds of USP Total Control modems (rack mounted Couriers) with the 33.6 upgrades. So I guess its worth it! Thread 10 of 423, Resp 13/13 (page 3): Re: Avoid USR Sportster 33.6 [ was: Spo Thanks for the info -- ========================================================================= Bill Poupore Ubiquitous Systems Toronto, Ontario wpoupore@inforamp.net h=help Thu, 11 Apr 1996 18:57:23 comp.dcom.modems Thread 11 of 423 Lines 43 USR Sportster Internet problem 1 Response ah002@freenet.hamilton.on.ca Tim Mastin at Hamilton-Wentworth FreeNet, Ontario Hi: I hope someone may be able to help me with this problem I have been having. Iam not entirely sure that this is a modem problem but I am starting to think that it may be. The problem is that my modem (new USR Sportster 28800 internal) will lock up after a short time (anywhere between 2 min and 30 min) on the internet. It does not usually drop carrier but freezes and I must exit windows and reboot my computer to get my modem functional again. Because of this I am writing this letter through Freenet. There are no lockup problems here but I still am unable to download as I get errors after about 20-50k bytes. Thread 11 of 423 (page 2): USR Sportster Internet problem I am running Spry Mosaic (although I also tried another browser which also continually locked up) in Win 3.1. My computer is a 486 DX2 66 with 8 Meg's of Ram. I am using the initialization string they recommend in the software (though I would appreciate some suggestions on a string to replace these in case this is the problem). Finally, when I run the trace after my modem freezes I see that I have had many, many "Framing Errors". I have no idea what this means or how to prevent it. Could it be my IO card? It's the same one that was in there back when my computer was a 386 DX 40 about a year ago. I don't want to bother replacing it if it is not the problem. Anyway, I am currently unable to access the www, which I am currently paying for, and my server has not been able to help. HELP! Any help would be appreciated. Thread 11 of 423 (page 3): USR Sportster Internet problem Thanks very, very much - Tim -- /\ /\ /\ /\ / \ / \ /\ "Too many damn trees!!" / \ /\ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \/ \ \ /______\______\____\ cat.island@freenet. /_____/____\____\ || || || hamilton.on.ca || || || ~~~"~~~~~~""~~~~~~~~~~~"~~"~~~~~~~~~~~~~""~~~~~"~"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~""~~ Sun, 14 Apr 1996 00:09:39 comp.dcom.modems Thread 11 of 423 Lines 69 Re: USR Sportster Internet problem Respno 1 of 1 Byron NetAmerica, Bowling Green, KY. ah002@freenet.hamilton.on.ca (Tim Mastin) wrote: >Hi: >I hope someone may be able to help me with this problem I have been >having. Iam not entirely sure that this is a modem problem but I am >starting to think that it may be. >The problem is that my modem (new USR Sportster 28800 internal) will lock >up after a short time (anywhere between 2 min and 30 min) on the >internet. It does not usually drop carrier but freezes and I must >exit windows and reboot my computer to get my modem functional >again. Because of this I am writing this letter through Freenet. There >are no lockup problems here but I still am unable to download as I get Thread 11 of 423, Resp 1/1 (page 2): Re: USR Sportster Internet problem >errors after about 20-50k bytes. >I am running Spry Mosaic (although I also tried another browser which >also continually locked up) in Win 3.1. My computer is a 486 DX2 66 with >8 Meg's of Ram. I am using the initialization string they recommend in the >software (though I would appreciate some suggestions on a string to >replace these in case this is the problem). >Finally, when I run the trace after my modem freezes I see that I have >had many, many "Framing Errors". I have no idea what this means or how to >prevent it. Could it be my IO card? It's the same one that was in there >back when my computer was a 386 DX 40 about a year ago. I don't want to >bother replacing it if it is not the problem. >Anyway, I am currently unable to access the www, which I am currently >paying for, and my server has not been able to help. HELP! Thread 11 of 423, Resp 1/1 (page 3): Re: USR Sportster Internet problem >Any help would be appreciated. > Thanks very, very much > - Tim Tim: The answer to this is more likely to be in your winsock software than a modem conflict. The reason why I say this is because of the Frame Check errors which is not good and is caused by the winsock settings not correctly set. This will most definetly cause your computer to lock up if it receives too many Frame Check errors. First, check to see if you have more than one winsock.dll on your hard drive. You Thread 11 of 423, Resp 1/1 (page 4): Re: USR Sportster Internet problem should only have one that came with the connection software that you use. If you find extras then you could rename them. The reason for the Frame Check errors is because of your winsock settings. If you are using Trumpet Winsock then TCP MSS should be a minimum of 212, MTU = TCP MSS + 40, TCP RWIN = TCP MSS *4. My settings are MTU = 1420, TCP RWIN = 5680 and TCP MSS = 1380. The only way of getting these right is by experimentation. Might want to check the winsock newsgroups on this. Wirte down your original settings. Some winsock.dll files are also kind of flakey, especially the older ones. I do have some trouble uploading files with Trumpet Software's winsock.dll in which the computer will lock up. I compared Trumpet's winsock and Quarterdeck's winsock on uploading a 1Meg file to my server. Trumpet's winsock locked up on 3 of 3 tries and Quarterdeck uploaded completely every time, although it seemed slower in Thread 11 of 423, Resp 1/1 (page 5): Re: USR Sportster Internet problem uploading. I hope this helps you. Byron h=help Thu, 11 Apr 1996 21:06:32 comp.dcom.modems Thread 13 of 423 Lines 11 USR Sportstar V.34 problem No responses kamizawa@lehman.com Kazuhiro Kamizawa at Lehman Brothers When I try to connect to our modem pool with my USR Sportster V.34, connection is always disconnected in approx. 1min. also connection speed is 21.6k or 24k. If I used Supra modem, I can communicate properly in 28.8k speed. I wonder why Sportstar does not work... Please advise me. Thanks, kamizawa e-mail: kamizawa@lehman.com h=help h=help Fri, 12 Apr 1996 01:33:32 comp.dcom.modems Thread 21 of 423 Lines 12 Re: ATI6 Speed Reports?? No responses morris@best.com Paul Morris at Best Internet Communications In article <316d6cb2.5621634@freedom.interealm.com>, ppasteur@inexus.interealm.com wrote: > I have an USR 28.8K Sportster. When I run the ATI6 command it reports speed with > two numbers. ie. 28800/19200 > I believe that one of these is a send and one a recieve speed. Which is which. > While the first number may vary between 24K and 28,8K the second one seems to > stay at 19.2k . Anyone know why, or what may be done to raise this speed a > bit. Receive/Send. The speed is dependent on the conditions in your phone line. h=help h=help Fri, 12 Apr 1996 07:25:00 comp.dcom.modems Thread 34 of 423 Lines 28 Re: New model USR Sportster????? 3 Responses bubba@insync.net Bill Garfield at Associated Technical Consultants On 11 Apr 1996 15:49:38 -0700, lbhoang@digital.netvoyage.net (Long Hoang) wrote: >The only reason why they would solder it on is if they switched to Flash >ROM (what's the part number on the soldered chip). With USR modems, Flash >ROM is not a feature but a necessity. They should've done this a long >time ago in the Sportster line. That would make their customers a little >happier. And, imagine the money they would save from not having a >support staff for handling ROM upgrades, shipping expenses, customer >damaged units and having to do it several times. It most definitely IS soldered in on the newest production units. Thread 34 of 423 (page 2): Re: New model USR Sportster????? It most definitely IS NOT flash rom. But you're correct about all the money they'll save from not having to buy sockets and from not being pestered by arbitrary, willy-nilly requests for "the latest firmware" when there is otherwise no substantiated need. Looks like it's going to be a very long, hot summer... ---------------------------------------------------------------- After ISDN, 28800 makes you want to get out and push!! Please do not send unsolicited commercial e_mail to this address ---------------------------------------------------------------- Fri, 12 Apr 1996 23:26:08 comp.dcom.modems Thread 34 of 423 Lines 4 Re: New model USR Sportster????? Respno 1 of 3 msgna.plombard@capital.ge.com Perry Lombard at GNA Corp I think that you can flash rom upgrade the new modems..... Perry Mon, 15 Apr 1996 08:53:29 comp.dcom.modems Thread 34 of 423 Lines 32 Re: New model USR Sportster????? Respno 2 of 3 delman@amsta.leeds.ac.uk Delman Lee at University of Leeds, UK. [*] Long Hoang writes: ] The only reason why they would solder it on is if they switched to Flash ] ROM (what's the part number on the soldered chip). Here's the part number. I would be more than happy (surprised in fact) if it's a flash PROM. I doubt it though... Delman. ----------------- The numbers on the chip where the socket used to be are: MX B3607 27c4096QC-10 Thread 34 of 423, Resp 2/3 (page 2): Re: New model USR Sportster????? M34631 TAIWAN VPP=12.5v With the following "engraved" on the chip (c) USR 19.589 011196 AAB1 -- _______________________________________________________________ Delman Lee delman@amsta.leeds.ac.uk Thread 34 of 423, Resp 2/3 (page 3): Re: New model USR Sportster????? Department of Statistics, University of Leeds, UK _______________________________________________________________ Tue, 16 Apr 1996 08:42:57 comp.dcom.modems Thread 34 of 423 Lines 29 Re: New model USR Sportster????? Respno 3 of 3 rjmcc@magi.com Magi Data Consulting On Thu, 11 Apr 1996 03:05:21 GMT, bubba@insync.net (Bill Garfield) wrote: >bashley@ktb2.ktb.net (Bev) wrote: > >>It's cheaper to solder than to socket; you do it when you're confident >>that everything is OK. Frequently a mistake :) > >You also do it when you're very much wishing to quell the willy-nilly >requests for arbitrary firmware upgrades without substantiated proof of >actual need. With the proper tools, replacing an SMD soldered-in chip >is just as easy as replacing a socketed one. > >The manufacturer's warranty states they "will repair or replace" but Thread 34 of 423, Resp 3/3 (page 2): Re: New model USR Sportster????? >says nothing about shipping bazillions of firmware upgrade chips to >every Tom, Dick and Harriet who calls requesting it just for the heck of >it. > >Soldered-in firmware chips and being forced to return the product to the >manufacturer for mere firmware replacement is likely to piss off a lot >of people, but I guarantee the plan will SLAM THE BRAKES ON all the >arbitrary requests for "the latest rev" when the request is otherwise >unfounded. > >Unpopular? Yes, very. >Good business? Youbetcherass. > Unpopular? Yes.... Good Business? You lost yerass.... h=help h=help h=help h=help Fri, 12 Apr 1996 21:30:55 comp.dcom.modems Thread 86 of 423 Lines 20 Re: USR 33.6 upgrade? -> Worth it? 2 Responses someone@nando.net Doug Nadel at Nando.net Public Access On 21 Mar 1996 02:16:30 GMT, maddox@grad.csee.usf.edu wrote: >I just recieved my USR 33.6 upgrade. > >I have noticed a few posts here about problems >with this upgrade and USR in general. > >My USR 28.8 (ROM 4/95) has given me no problems but I >was wondering if this upgrade is worth the trouble. > NOTHING is worth trying to contact a human being at USR. If your order was complete, feel lucky. I've been trying forever just to contact a person at USR to send me the chip puller. So far I've even Thread 86 of 423 (page 2): Re: USR 33.6 upgrade? -> Worth it? gotten 2 people to tell me they would send one. Of course, I haven't seen anything. Is it worth it? I'd give it a resounding ** NO ** Doug Nadel (yes, I realise you were asking about connection speed, but any purchase consideration includes service and USR has none) Mon, 15 Apr 1996 23:11:01 comp.dcom.modems Thread 86 of 423 Lines 26 Re: USR 33.6 upgrade? -> Worth it? Respno 1 of 2 bigrex@primenet.com Bob Nixon at primenet.com What's the matter with radio shack or another electronics store for a chip puller. In article <316f1081.2335301@news.nando.net>, someone@nando.net says... > >On 21 Mar 1996 02:16:30 GMT, maddox@grad.csee.usf.edu wrote: > >>I just recieved my USR 33.6 upgrade. >> >>I have noticed a few posts here about problems >>with this upgrade and USR in general. >> >>My USR 28.8 (ROM 4/95) has given me no problems but I >>was wondering if this upgrade is worth the trouble. Thread 86 of 423, Resp 1/2 (page 2): Re: USR 33.6 upgrade? -> Worth it? >> > >NOTHING is worth trying to contact a human being at USR. If your >order was complete, feel lucky. I've been trying forever just to >contact a person at USR to send me the chip puller. So far I've even >gotten 2 people to tell me they would send one. Of course, I haven't >seen anything. Is it worth it? I'd give it a resounding ** NO ** > >Doug Nadel >(yes, I realise you were asking about connection speed, but any >purchase consideration includes service and USR has none) Wed, 17 Apr 1996 10:54:27 comp.dcom.modems Thread 86 of 423 Lines 32 Re: USR 33.6 upgrade? -> Worth it? Respno 2 of 2 m_c_0003@mtsu.edu Tommy Forrest-KE4PYM at Middle Tennessee State University On Sat, 13 Apr 1996, Doug Nadel wrote: > On 21 Mar 1996 02:16:30 GMT, maddox@grad.csee.usf.edu wrote: > > >I just recieved my USR 33.6 upgrade. > > > >I have noticed a few posts here about problems > >with this upgrade and USR in general. > > > >My USR 28.8 (ROM 4/95) has given me no problems but I > >was wondering if this upgrade is worth the trouble. > > > > NOTHING is worth trying to contact a human being at USR. If your Thread 86 of 423, Resp 2/2 (page 2): Re: USR 33.6 upgrade? -> Worth it? > order was complete, feel lucky. I've been trying forever just to > contact a person at USR to send me the chip puller. So far I've even > gotten 2 people to tell me they would send one. Of course, I haven't > seen anything. Is it worth it? I'd give it a resounding ** NO ** > > Doug Nadel > (yes, I realise you were asking about connection speed, but any > purchase consideration includes service and USR has none) > > Shesh, pop that thing out with a screwdriver already. Email: m_c_0003@mtsu.edu - Tommy - KE4PYM or forrest_su@mtsu.edu http://www.mtsu.edu/~m_c_0003 Thread 86 of 423, Resp 2/2 (page 3): Re: USR 33.6 upgrade? -> Worth it? h=help Fri, 12 Apr 1996 22:59:54 comp.dcom.modems Thread 92 of 423 Lines 17 USR Phasing Out Courier Modem ?? 2 Responses dudjinsk@mts.net Kenneth T. Dudjinski at MTS Internet Services Have had contact with two modem retail suppliers while trying to purchase a Courier V.34 everything modem. Was advised that they were unable to obtain stock from USR as they are phasing out their present Couriers. Has anyone one else heard this? Does anyone know what the replacement product will be? Also, does anyone have any advice on where to purchase an internal Courier V.34 Everything with the best price in mind? Thanks Ken........... Thread 92 of 423 (page 2): USR Phasing Out Courier Modem ?? Mon, 15 Apr 1996 10:09:54 comp.dcom.modems Thread 92 of 423 Lines 13 Re: USR Phasing Out Courier Modem ?? Respno 1 of 2 dudjinsk@mts.net Kenneth T. Dudjinski at MTS Internet Services I followed up this post with a note to US Robotics. Received a reply within three days, which I think is quite reasonable. USR advises that there aren't any plans to discontinue the Courier V.34 Everything and that the product is still shipping. It appears from this reply that the rumour is just that - a rumour. Thanks to all that replied to me personally. It was very much appreciated. Ken......... Wed, 17 Apr 1996 18:05:46 comp.dcom.modems Thread 92 of 423 Lines 20 Re: USR Phasing Out Courier Modem ?? Respno 2 of 2 benny@shadow.net Benito Horta at Shadow Information Services, Inc. Kenneth T. Dudjinski (dudjinsk@mts.net) wrote: : Have had contact with two modem retail suppliers while trying to : purchase a Courier V.34 everything modem. Was advised that they : were unable to obtain stock from USR as they are phasing out their : present Couriers. : Has anyone one else heard this? Does anyone know what the replacement : product will be? : Also, does anyone have any advice on where to purchase an internal : Courier V.34 Everything with the best price in mind? : Thanks Thread 92 of 423, Resp 2/2 (page 2): Re: USR Phasing Out Courier Modem ?? : Ken........... they might be phasing it out to push thier courier-I modems. h=help h=help Sat, 13 Apr 1996 00:03:51 comp.dcom.modems Thread 97 of 423 Lines 29 Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing 7 Responses parsont@peak.org Tyler Parsons at CS Outreach Services--PEAK, Corvallis, Orego In article , cthompso@AWINC.COM says... > >My new Sportster 28,800 Data/Fax Internal modem will not receive faxes from >regular fax machines. It will only receive faxes from 14,400 modems. >Has anyone been able to solve this problem. I have tried the Quick link II >software, Winfax Lite software and MS Exchange Fax - same problem all >programs. Have already got a new replacement modem from dealer and same proble. >Any solutions would be greatly appreciated. I am having exactly the same problem! I have a Panasonic fax machine in my office so I tried faxing to the computer. e Thread 97 of 423 (page 2): Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing computer would answer the phone, then nothing. Usually, I get a tone at the faxr the phone line, which tells the fax machine it can send, then I push the green d it sends. No tones from the USR, so couldn't send. Called USR and spent 30 minutes waiting. When I finally got through, they asked. "COM3?, then disable COM1 on your motherboard." After trying to figure that oney put the modem on COM1 (I really need the other comport though). So, again nothi. I finally saw your message and tried another computer fax. It almost worked! Go5 percent of the image. What is the good if I can't get a fax from a fax machine.A Thread 97 of 423 (page 3): Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing internal 14.4/14.4 that I may go back to. I am going to contact USR again and see what they have to say. Tyler Parsons parsont@peak.org Sat, 13 Apr 1996 16:18:22 comp.dcom.modems Thread 97 of 423 Lines 13 Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing Respno 1 of 7 buddy@world.com Buddy at UN "Craig W. Thompson" wrote: >"My new Sportster 28,800 Data/Fax Internal modem will not receive faxes from >"regular fax machines. It will only receive faxes from 14,400 modems. >"Has anyone been able to solve this problem. I have tried the Quick link II >"software, Winfax Lite software and MS Exchange Fax - same problem all >"programs. Have already got a new replacement modem from dealer and same probl. >"Any solutions would be greatly appreciated. Never seen a fax machine,or fax pgm that you could exceed the 144 speed. Buddy Sat, 13 Apr 1996 20:23:50 comp.dcom.modems Thread 97 of 423 Lines 29 Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing Respno 2 of 7 jonk@blkbox.com Doug Krahmer at ElectraSoft "Craig W. Thompson" wrote: >My new Sportster 28,800 Data/Fax Internal modem will not receive faxes from >regular fax machines. It will only receive faxes from 14,400 modems. >Has anyone been able to solve this problem. I have tried the Quick link II >software, Winfax Lite software and MS Exchange Fax - same problem all >programs. Have already got a new replacement modem from dealer and same proble. >Any solutions would be greatly appreciated. Try FaxMail for Windows. It is a shareware program available for free trial. The newest version is on ElectraSoft's home page. -Doug Krahmer, ElectraSoft Thread 97 of 423, Resp 2/7 (page 2): Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing Contact: Internet: jonk@blkbox.com Fidonet: Doug Krahmer on 1:106/10000 FAX: 1-713-499-8423 Voice: 1-713-261-0307 Snail Mail: 3207 Carmel Valley Dr. Missouri City, TX 77459-3068 Download a free coppy of FaxMail or FaxMail Network for Windows: WWW: http://www.blkbox.com/~jonk/ FTP: ftp://garbo.uwasa.fi/windows/comm/ BBS: 1-713-499-5939 CIS: GO PCFF, Search FaxMail AOL: GO keyword: Software, Library Search: FaxMail Sun, 14 Apr 1996 13:28:48 comp.dcom.modems Thread 97 of 423 Lines 27 Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing Respno 3 of 7 parsont@peak.org Tyler Parsons at CS Outreach Services--PEAK, Corvallis, Orego In article <4kp9dk$o0e@dfw-ixnews1.ix.netcom.com>, buddy@world.com says... > >"Craig W. Thompson" wrote: > >>"My new Sportster 28,800 Data/Fax Internal modem will not receive faxes from >>"regular fax machines. It will only receive faxes from 14,400 modems. >>"Has anyone been able to solve this problem. I have tried the Quick link II >>"software, Winfax Lite software and MS Exchange Fax - same problem all >>"programs. Have already got a new replacement modem from dealer and same probe >m. >>"Any solutions would be greatly appreciated. > > Never seen a fax machine,or fax pgm that you could exceed Thread 97 of 423, Resp 3/7 (page 2): Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing >the 144 speed. > Buddy > The problem is that it will not connect at 9600! with another fax machine. I am having the same problem. I have a fax machine in my office along with the USR modem and I can send to my fax machine, but not receive from it. None of the normal tones are sent which will enable me to send. Craig is having the same problem. Tyler Parsons parsons@peak.org Mon, 15 Apr 1996 01:17:02 comp.dcom.modems Thread 97 of 423 Lines 35 Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing Respno 4 of 7 ppasteur@nexus.interealm.com Phil Pasteur at privateI, LLC parsont@peak.org (Tyler Parsons) wrote: >In article <4kp9dk$o0e@dfw-ixnews1.ix.netcom.com>, buddy@world.com says... >> >>"Craig W. Thompson" wrote: >> >>>"My new Sportster 28,800 Data/Fax Internal modem will not receive faxes from >>>"regular fax machines. It will only receive faxes from 14,400 modems. >>>"Has anyone been able to solve this problem. I have tried the Quick link II >>>"software, Winfax Lite software and MS Exchange Fax - same problem all >>>"programs. Have already got a new replacement modem from dealer and same proe >>m. >>>"Any solutions would be greatly appreciated. Thread 97 of 423, Resp 4/7 (page 2): Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing >> >> Never seen a fax machine,or fax pgm that you could exceed >>the 144 speed. >> Buddy >> > >The problem is that it will not connect at 9600! with another fax machine. >I am having the same problem. I have a fax machine in my office along with >the USR modem and I can send to my fax machine, but not receive from it. >None of the normal tones are sent which will enable me to send. > >Craig is having the same problem. > Well I do nothave any solutions, but I am having the same problem. I am using a new Sportster 33,6 under win95 .with Winfax Pro 7.0. When trying to receive a fax, the modem answers but the fax program never sends the handshake tones. Thread 97 of 423, Resp 4/7 (page 3): Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing Eventually the modem just hangs up. This just started happening when I upgraded (?) from a Sportster 28.8. The older modem worked fine in the exact same setup. If any of you folks get any answers...I sure would appreciate hearing about it. Phil Philip R. Pasteur ppasteur@nexus.interealm.com Wed, 17 Apr 1996 23:37:54 comp.dcom.modems Thread 97 of 423 Lines 49 Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing Respno 5 of 7 JNavas@NavasGrp.com John Navas at The Navas Group of Dublin, CA, USA [Posted to comp.dcom.modems] ppasteur@nexus.interealm.com (Phil Pasteur) wrote: >Well I do nothave any solutions, but I am having the same problem. I am using a >new Sportster 33,6 under win95 .with Winfax Pro 7.0. When trying to receive a >fax, the modem answers but the fax program never sends the handshake tones. >Eventually the modem just hangs up. This just started happening when I upgraded >(?) from a Sportster 28.8. The older modem worked fine in the exact same setup. >If any of you folks get any answers...I sure would appreciate hearing about it. Thread 97 of 423, Resp 5/7 (page 2): Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing The following assumes that you have the current USR INF file for Win95 (available on the USR BBS and FTP server), and that the modem is installed correctly. If you can't get your modem to auto-answer under Delrina WinFax 7.0 (for Windows 95), even though auto-answer is checked under Setup | Receive, particularly if you have updated and/or redetected your modem, try the following: 1. Open Setup | Modem. a) Be sure the modem is listed as the "Active modem." If it is not, select the modem and click the "Set as Active" key. b) Select the modem and click "Properties." Make sure "TAPI" is selected as the "Communictions port." Click OK. Thread 97 of 423, Resp 5/7 (page 3): Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing c) Click OK to close the Modems dialog box. 2. Open Setup | Receive. a) Be sure "Automatically answer incoming calls" is checked. Set the number of rings to "2" (at least until you get it working). b) Click OK to close the Receive Properties dialog box. IMPORTANT: BE *SURE* TO CLICK OK -- do not press or click cancel EVEN IF YOU MADE NO CHANGES. Watch to see if the message "Fax/modem enabled" appears at the left end of the Status Bar, and if a small modem icon appears in the first pane of the Status Bar. Thread 97 of 423, Resp 5/7 (page 4): Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing NOTE: YOU HAVE TO REPEAT THESE STEPS EVERY TIME YOU CHANGE YOUR MODEM, EVEN THOUGH WINFAX STILL SHOWS A CHECK BY AUTO-ANSWER! -- Best regards, John mailto:JNavas@NavasGrp.com http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/ 28800 Modem FAQ: http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/modem/faq.html Thu, 18 Apr 1996 21:39:13 comp.dcom.modems Thread 97 of 423 Lines 28 Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing Respno 6 of 7 ppasteur@nexus.interealm.com Phil Pasteur at privateI, LLC parsont@peak.org (Tyler Parsons) wrote: >I am having exactly the same problem! > >I have a Panasonic fax machine in my office so I tried faxing to the computer.e >computer would answer the phone, then nothing. Usually, I get a tone at the far >the phone line, which tells the fax machine it can send, then I push the greend >it sends. No tones from the USR, so couldn't send. This is what I see as well! Thread 97 of 423, Resp 6/7 (page 2): Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing > >Called USR and spent 30 minutes waiting. When I finally got through, they aske. >"COM3?, then disable COM1 on your motherboard." After trying to figure that ony >put the modem on COM1 (I really need the other comport though). So, again noth. They told me there was a NEW firmware chip dated March '96 that would fix this. They are sending me one ( someday)! The guy I talked to must have had this info on his computer in some kind of tech bulletin. As soon as I described the problem and told him the firmware rev that I have he said "you need a new chip" Thread 97 of 423, Resp 6/7 (page 3): Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing We will see! > Philip R. Pasteur ppasteur@nexus.interealm.com Fri, 19 Apr 1996 09:19:14 comp.dcom.modems Thread 97 of 423 Lines 45 Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing Respno 7 of 7 parsont@peak.org Tyler Parsons at CS Outreach Services--PEAK, Corvallis, Orego In article <3176fbc0.2522723@freedom.interealm.com>, ppasteur@nexus.interealm.c. > >parsont@peak.org (Tyler Parsons) wrote: > > >>I am having exactly the same problem! >> >>I have a Panasonic fax machine in my office so I tried faxing to the computer. >No response. The >>computer would answer the phone, then nothing. Usually, I get a tone at the fx > machine, over Thread 97 of 423, Resp 7/7 (page 2): Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing >>the phone line, which tells the fax machine it can send, then I push the green >send button and >>it sends. No tones from the USR, so couldn't send. > >This is what I see as well! > >They told me there was a NEW firmware chip dated March '96 that would fix this. >They are sending me one ( someday)! > >The guy I talked to must have had this info on his computer in some kind of teh >bulletin. As soon as I described the problem and told him the firmware rev that >I have he said "you need a new chip" Thread 97 of 423, Resp 7/7 (page 3): Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing > >We will see! >> > >Philip R. Pasteur >ppasteur@nexus.interealm.com I also am being sent a new chip but until I receive it I am continuing to try. I found that the USR did not respond to an incoming fax if I tried to send it manually, that is, wait until the faxmodem responds with the handshaking tones then press the "green button". HOWEVER, if I programmed the faxmachine for automatic fax send, it apparently sends out the proper tones for the USR to recognize, then the USR responds, and everything is OK. Not too good though because everyone doesn't have telephone numbers programmed into their fax machie Thread 97 of 423, Resp 7/7 (page 4): Re: Sportster 28,800 and Faxing to send everyone else a fax. Hope the new chip works. Tyler Parsons parsont@peak.org h=help h=help h=help h=help Sun, 14 Apr 1996 10:36:42 comp.dcom.modems Thread 155 of 423 Lines 16 Is the USR Sportster 33.6 K external modem anNo responses mav@ghgcorp.com Maverick at Top Gun Hi I am planning to buy the USR Sportster external with the 33.6K capability and wondering if anyone already own this model can give me some comments on their experience with this modem ? Do you have any problem with it? What is the date of the chip on your modem ? Is there a cetain "date" version of that chip that has bugs ? Thanks Thread 155 of 423 (page 2): Is the USR Sportster 33.6 K external modem any goo Please reply to mav@ghgcorp.com h=help h=help Message from Talk_Daemon@earth at 12:17 ... ntalk: connection requested by whiteboy@earth. ntalk: respond with: ntalk whiteboy@earth Sun, 14 Apr 1996 16:00:30 comp.dcom.modems Thread 165 of 423 Lines 25 Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ 8 Responses marvin@superlink.net Warren or Tony Lieuallen at SuperNet, Inc., NJ, USA (908- I recently bought a 33.6k modem. I ham having two main problems with it: 1) I know that most 28.8 modems and faster ones don't always connect at their fastest pssible speed, but mine always connects at 26400. any Ideas? Would the text from ati4 help? 2) Every once in a while, the modem pauses. If I continue to type, the text shows up in a second or two, but nothing will happen. All sent daa is sennt, but it is paused. Any Ideas? ADVthankthankANCE (Thanks in advance) -- +-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+ Thread 165 of 423 (page 2): Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ | Tony Lieuallen | marvin@mars.superlink.net | +-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+ | http://mars.superlink.net/marvin/home | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | * It's Non-Toxic! That means you can eat it!! | | * WWW really stands for World Wide Wait!!! | | * Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side and a dark side and | | it holds the universe together. | | * Flashlight: Device to store dead batteries. | | * It goes without saying... Correct me if I'm wrong, 'cause I am a lot! | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Sun, 14 Apr 1996 20:12:38 comp.dcom.modems Thread 165 of 423 Lines 30 Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ Respno 1 of 8 bubba@insync.net Bill Garfield at Associated Technical Consultants marvin@superlink.net (Warren or Tony Lieuallen) wrote: >I recently bought a 33.6k modem. I ham having two main problems with it: > >1) I know that most 28.8 modems and faster ones don't always connect at >their fastest pssible speed, but mine always connects at 26400. any >Ideas? Would the text from ati4 help? > >2) Every once in a while, the modem pauses. If I continue to type, the >text shows up in a second or two, but nothing will happen. All sent daa >is sennt, but it is paused. Any Ideas? From your description I'd bet you bought a new USR Sportster 33.6 Thread 165 of 423, Resp 1/8 (page 2): Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ Problem #2 (momentary freeze ups) is a known, repeatable, documented buglet in all "new" V34 (33.6) Sportster firmware releases through 3-4-96. Also USR is now reportedly SOLDERING the firmware chip in place, mandating full product return for something as trivial as a firmware update. The only thing to do is call USR at 1-847-982-5151, on your dime, wait your turn in the hold queue, and complain. Your speed problem, on the other hand, is likely due to problems on your phone lines, both yours and the system you are calling. Your modem will only connect at speeds which the phone lines will support. It's like buying a new 150 mph Corvette... there's not many roads where you can drive 150, and there's darn few telephone lines that'll support 33.6 Mon, 15 Apr 1996 15:16:20 comp.dcom.modems Thread 165 of 423 Lines 34 Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ Respno 2 of 8 marvin@mars.superlink.net Tony Lieuallen at SuperNet Inc. (908) 828-8988 On Mon, 15 Apr 1996, Bill Garfield wrote: > marvin@superlink.net (Warren or Tony Lieuallen) wrote: > > >I recently bought a 33.6k modem. I ham having two main problems with it: > > > >1) I know that most 28.8 modems and faster ones don't always connect at > >their fastest pssible speed, but mine always connects at 26400. any > >Ideas? Would the text from ati4 help? > > > >2) Every once in a while, the modem pauses. If I continue to type, the > >text shows up in a second or two, but nothing will happen. All sent daa > >is sennt, but it is paused. Any Ideas? > Thread 165 of 423, Resp 2/8 (page 2): Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ > >From your description I'd bet you bought a new USR Sportster 33.6 Acutally, when I type ati4, it says it's a Texas Instruments RK 33600. It may be a rip-off thought... The thing about the lower speed is that it is always the same. I already undrestood that it won't alwasy connect at 33.6, but I thought there would be some variation, or at least 28.8... +-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+ | Tony Lieuallen | marvin@mars.superlink.net | +-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------+ | http://mars.superlink.net/marvin/home | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | * It's Non-Toxic! That means you can eat it!! | | * WWW really stands for World Wide Wait!!! | | * Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side and a dark side and | | it holds the universe together. | Thread 165 of 423, Resp 2/8 (page 3): Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ | * Flashlight: Device to store dead batteries. | | * It goes without saying... Correct me if I'm wrong, 'cause I am a lot! | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Mon, 15 Apr 1996 20:36:46 comp.dcom.modems Thread 165 of 423 Lines 21 Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ Respno 3 of 8 JNavas@NavasGrp.com John Navas at The Navas Group of Dublin, CA, USA [Posted to comp.dcom.modems] marvin@superlink.net (Warren or Tony Lieuallen) wrote: >I recently bought a 33.6k modem. I ham having two main problems with it: > >1) I know that most 28.8 modems and faster ones don't always connect at >their fastest pssible speed, but mine always connects at 26400. any >Ideas? Would the text from ati4 help? See my FAQ. >2) Every once in a while, the modem pauses. If I continue to type, the >text shows up in a second or two, but nothing will happen. All sent daa >is sennt, but it is paused. Any Ideas? Thread 165 of 423, Resp 3/8 (page 2): Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ The modems are retraining, an indication that you have line problems. -- Best regards, John mailto:JNavas@NavasGrp.com http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/ 28800 Modem FAQ: http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/modem/faq.html Mon, 15 Apr 1996 21:02:01 comp.dcom.modems Thread 165 of 423 Lines 32 Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ Respno 4 of 8 porters@pbinet.com Scott Porter at Zypcom, Inc. Hi Marvin: A couple of ideas on your two problems. Connections always at 26.4Kbps could be A). Your setup command string forces the link speed to 26.4. Check you AT command & S registers that control the line rate, set it for 19.2 and see what happens, then force (connect at 28.8 or hangup) the 28.8K rate and see what happens. B). Maybe the answer side modem your calling is forced to a max. rate of 26.4 which will cause you to go 26.4 (this assumes you do not have V.34 assymeterical carrier speed capabiltiy in your modem). Thread 165 of 423, Resp 4/8 (page 2): Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ C). You might have a V.34+ modem with a firmware bug that creates the 26.4K connection. Modem pauses. . . A). This is probably a modem retrain that is causing the pause. To check send the modem a M2 command in the setup string which will keep you modems speaker on at all times. If you hear the retrain tone at the same time the pause occurs the you have your answer. B). The pause could also be a simple data error which will casue a retransmission by the sending modem (if your running V.42bis or MNP error control) and this can take 500 to 1500ms hence your delay. Try slowing down the link one notch if the pause ends up being due to a data retransmission. Thread 165 of 423, Resp 4/8 (page 3): Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ Hope this helps. Best regards. Scott Porter. Tue, 16 Apr 1996 00:13:25 comp.dcom.modems Thread 165 of 423 Lines 23 Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ Respno 5 of 8 johnd@3rdplanet.com John Davis at Wolfe Internet Access, L.L.C. Tony Lieuallen wrote: >On Mon, 15 Apr 1996, Bill Garfield wrote: >> marvin@superlink.net (Warren or Tony Lieuallen) wrote: >> >> >I recently bought a 33.6k modem. I ham having two main problems with it: >> > >> >1) I know that most 28.8 modems and faster ones don't always connect at >> >their fastest pssible speed, but mine always connects at 26400. any >> >Ideas? Would the text from ati4 help? >> > >> >2) Every once in a while, the modem pauses. If I continue to type, the >> >text shows up in a second or two, but nothing will happen. All sent daa Thread 165 of 423, Resp 5/8 (page 2): Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ >> >is sennt, but it is paused. Any Ideas? >> Yes, two acctually. The reason you can't connect at 33.6 (or 28.8) is because the phone lines in your area can't handle it, or that your service provider dosen't have the high quality USR or Motorola modems that usualy connect at 28.8 or 33.6 (I have NEVER connected at 33.6 in my area, and I have great phone line conditions.) Wed, 17 Apr 1996 19:25:56 comp.dcom.modems Thread 165 of 423 Lines 22 Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ Respno 6 of 8 jwhite1@rain.org John White at RAIN Public Access Internet (805) 967-RAIN In article <3172f3f0.859288@news.pbinet.com>, JNavas@NavasGrp.com (John Navas) : >[Posted to comp.dcom.modems] >marvin@superlink.net (Warren or Tony Lieuallen) wrote: > >>I recently bought a 33.6k modem. I ham having two main problems with it: >> >>1) I know that most 28.8 modems and faster ones don't always connect at >>their fastest pssible speed, but mine always connects at 26400. any >>Ideas? Would the text from ati4 help? > >See my FAQ. > >>2) Every once in a while, the modem pauses. If I continue to type, the Thread 165 of 423, Resp 6/8 (page 2): Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ >>text shows up in a second or two, but nothing will happen. All sent daa >>is sennt, but it is paused. Any Ideas? > >The modems are retraining, an indication that you have line problems. > The modem may be retraining but that is not necessarily a line problem. I have often put a different model of modem on the same "bad line" and found the "line problem" goes away. The problem (particularly in USR modems) is often buggy code. Fri, 19 Apr 1996 01:51:05 comp.dcom.modems Thread 165 of 423 Lines 26 Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ Respno 7 of 8 hbcsc096@csun.edu justin gombos at Anti-Exon Society > >2) Every once in a while, the modem pauses. If I continue to type, the > >text shows up in a second or two, but nothing will happen. All sent daa > >is sennt, but it is paused. Any Ideas? > The modems are retraining, an indication that you have line problems. That is most likely not the case. I had the exact same problem with a different brand modem using the same BUGGY firmware as the Sportster. When looking at the stats at the end of the session, it reported 0 retrains. BTW: Someone should start a list of defective modems; like whoever maintains the faq. I'll start it out: Thread 165 of 423, Resp 7/8 (page 2): Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ DEFECTIVE: USR Sportster Yokohoma 33.6 AmJet 33.6 In WORKING order: USR Courier -- http://www.csun.edu/~hbcsc096/dt Fri, 19 Apr 1996 17:26:55 comp.dcom.modems Thread 165 of 423 Lines 8 Re: Problems with new 33.6k v.34+ Respno 8 of 8 eric@ao.net Eric Shaw at Access Orlando In article <4l7d4p$qu9@dewey.csun.edu>, hbcsc096@csun.edu (justin gombos) wrote: >BTW: Someone should start a list of defective modems; like whoever >maintains the faq. I'll start it out: > >In WORKING order: > USR Courier I believe this particular modem is in the wrong list. Sun, 14 Apr 1996 16:32:34 comp.dcom.modems Thread 166 of 423 Lines 5 Difference between Motorola Lifestyle and Mod5 Responses rshwake@nearside.in.irs.gov Raymond Shwake at IRS - A/C (International) The Lifestyle seems to be rapidly disappearling, probably to be replaced by the new ModemSurfer model. Is this an improved, more advanced model, or just a cheaper variant? One Egghead has a Lifestyle or two left for $159, and the ModemSurfer for $179. Any reason to go for one over the other? Mon, 15 Apr 1996 03:54:24 comp.dcom.modems Thread 166 of 423 Lines 46 Re: Difference between Motorola Lifestyle andRespno 1 of 5 zeke@fasttech.com Bohdan Tashchuk at Fast Technology --- Beaverton, OR In rshwake@nearside.in.irs.gov (Raymond Shwake: > The Lifestyle seems to be rapidly disappearling, probably to be >replaced by the new ModemSurfer model. Is this an improved, more advanced >model, or just a cheaper variant? One Egghead has a Lifestyle or two left >for $159, and the ModemSurfer for $179. Any reason to go for one over the >other? The ModemSurfr is definitely improved. At least in one way that was VERY important to me. I recently bought a Lifestyle and almost immediately returned it for the ModemSurfr. This is because the engineers doing the earlier design Thread 166 of 423, Resp 1/5 (page 2): Re: Difference between Motorola Lifestyl were forced by dumb marketing pukes into supporting Plug & Pray crap, with no other method of configuring the modem. This meant that the only way I could use my modem under Unix was to first boot into DOS so the P&P device driver could initialize the COM port address and IRQ number, then warm boot into Unix. When I bought the Lifestyle I assumed that the Plug & Pray crap was just a one-time thing, and the port address and IRQ would be stored in non-volatile memory. I was wrong. They must be reinitialized after every hard reset. The modem I bought had just been returned a few minutes previously by a customer who claimed the Plug & Pray crap wouldn't work in his computer at all. Thread 166 of 423, Resp 1/5 (page 3): Re: Difference between Motorola Lifestyl The newer ModemSurfr has physical jumpers to select COM port address and IRQ number, in addition to more physical jumpers to enable the Plug & Pray crap. I wonder how much money the dumb marketing slime at Motorola who believed the Intel/Micro$oft P&P bullshit cost the company on this one. The modem I returned will probably find its way back to Motorola, with an indication that it was unuseable by two customers. I'm quite happy with the new modem. Both it and the old one connect quite reliably to my ISP at 24k to 28k (depends on which line I get). If you run Win95 you might not even be affected by the P&P problems. Hmmm. Did I make clear what I REALLY thing about Plug & Play? :-) -- Thread 166 of 423, Resp 1/5 (page 4): Re: Difference between Motorola Lifestyl Bohdan The Failed Clinton Presidency - America Held Hostage - Day 1182 h=help h=help Mon, 15 Apr 1996 02:21:02 comp.dcom.modems Thread 177 of 423 Lines 9 USR Sportster 28.8 to 33.6 No responses hermana@ibm.net[SerafinHermanaUgarte] UnipalmPIPEX server (post doesn't reflec How can I say if my modem is upgradable to 33.6? If so, how do I make the upgrade? Thanks in advance. ------------------------------------------------------------ Serafin Hermana Ugarte. hermana@ibm.net San Lorenzo de El Escorial http://www.banesto.es/banesto/escorial/e9700010.htm Spain h=help h=help Mon, 15 Apr 1996 13:52:15 comp.dcom.modems Thread 196 of 423 Lines 18 USRobotics Sportster 28,800 Fax Modem - Init No responses lazer@nauticom.net Ron at Nauticom - Internet Access Provider Could someone help me on what exactly the following Init string does? AT&F&H1&R2&B1&C1&D2&M4&K0&A3E1V1&W0 My ISP listed this as the best solution for better connections but since I started using it, It seems I connect at 21,600 and no higher. I used to get an average of 24,000 and sometimes 26,400 connects but occasionaly have trouble staying connected. This is the External Sportster and has the 33.6 capability already. Does anyone know how to force the best possible connection? I am using Windows95 dial-up. Also, Is it okay or rather should I leave this modem on or turn it off when not using it? I generally leave my computer on all the time? Thread 196 of 423 (page 2): USRobotics Sportster 28,800 Fax Modem - Init Str. Thanks for any help! lazer@nauticom.net h=help Mon, 15 Apr 1996 16:07:52 comp.dcom.modems Thread 205 of 423 Lines 9 Sportster 33.6 and faxing (Mac) 1 Response jay@uic.edu Jay Becker at University of Illinois at Chicago Since installing the 33.6 chip in my Sportster, I can no longer fax out with my 7500 using FaxSTF 3.1, FaxSTF 3.2.1, ValueFax 2.0.8, or GlobalFax 2.5.5. The modem connects to a fax machine but then hangs up without sending. The error message with STF is -6001, "failure to train." Any suggestions appreciated. Thanks. Mon, 15 Apr 1996 18:56:40 comp.dcom.modems Thread 205 of 423 Lines 24 Re: Sportster 33.6 and faxing (Mac) Respno 1 of 1 alexb@clark.net Alex Batson at ClarkNet Internet Services On Mon, 15 Apr 1996 15:07:52 -0600, Jay Becker wrote: : Since installing the 33.6 chip in my Sportster, I can no longer fax : out with my 7500 using FaxSTF 3.1, FaxSTF 3.2.1, ValueFax 2.0.8, or : GlobalFax 2.5.5. The modem connects to a fax machine but then hangs up : without sending. The error message with STF is -6001, "failure to : train." Id seen time and time again with my old USR14.4... total inability to fax... I sold it in favor of a real modem.. SupraFAX 28.8 External.. Never had a problem since then.. Its the proprietary chipset inside a USR modem.. they use their own chipset, rather than the Rockwell chips used in the better Supras and PPI's...I've seen that USR as a rule don't talk to fax machines [hardly at all..] Thread 205 of 423, Resp 1/1 (page 2): Re: Sportster 33.6 and faxing (Mac) Alex -- *&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*&^*& Alexander R. Batson CNE Consultant, Mac Guru Ellicott City, MD ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Macintosh Shareware FTP: ftp.clark.net /pub/alexb ----------------------------------------------------------------------- USA h=help h=help Mon, 15 Apr 1996 18:21:24 comp.dcom.modems Thread 214 of 423 Lines 18 Problems with USR 33.6 SPortsers - DTR Loss No responses john@infomatch.com John Chapman at Maine State Governtment We purchased a number of USR 33.6 Sportster externals a few months back and every one of these modems have malfunctioned by losing DTR and requiring a power cycle. These must have been amongst the first 33.6 externals manufactured, and recently I have heard that there may have been problems with these that have been since corrected. Does anyone know the latest DSP/ROM revision numbers? Thanks! -- Thread 214 of 423 (page 2): Problems with USR 33.6 SPortsers - DTR Loss ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |||| John Chapman UNIX - SL/IP - WWW || john@infomatch.com (604)421-3230 |||| InfoMatch Communications Inc http://infomatch.com h=help Mon, 15 Apr 1996 18:36:12 comp.dcom.modems Thread 215 of 423 Lines 8 Sportster 33.6/28.8 Vi trouble connecting to No responses ceder@prostar.com Ceder at ProStar Plus Internet I have the SAME EXACT problem! I have a Courier 33.6 and I connect to my ISP's hayes optimas at mostly 21.6, sometimes at 24.0. If i DISABLE the 3429 symbol rate then my connections improve. To disable the 3429 symbol rate on the courier it's ATS54.5=1. i'm not sure what it is for the sportster... look in your manual :) Michael forest@prostar.com h=help h=help h=help h=help Tue, 16 Apr 1996 18:42:11 comp.dcom.modems Thread 260 of 423 Lines 10 USR Sportster 33.6 fax/voice/SPEAKERPHONE No responses user@kmail.ksc.nasa.gov user at NASA, Kennedy Space Center The latest C. Shopper has a two page add for their line of modems. New models, new prices on old models. Most interesting was a new USR 33.6 fax/voice/SPEAKERPHONE modem with a model number something 1171. Will GW2K offer this? I wonder if it uses Microsoft Phone for it's telephony features? I haven't seen it for sale anywhere yet. I wonder if anyone is using MS Phone yet? h=help h=help h=help Wed, 17 Apr 1996 17:52:37 comp.dcom.modems Thread 300 of 423 Lines 36 RE: Winmodem 288 2 Responses jamesgal@ix.netcom.com James Gallegos at Morning Wood Desires Inc. On Monday, April 08, 1996, Anthony Hill wrote... > > (Unknown) writes: > > I got a Winmodem 28800, how can I get the damn thing to connect at 28800 > > instead of 26400 or 24000, it's really buging me, if you know tell me!!! > > Replace all the phone wires in your city as well as all the > switching equipment that your telco is using, it'll only cost you a few > million dollars.. Otherwise you can grin an bear it.. In many areas 26.4 > or 24.0 is all that the phone lines and telco equipment can handle at Thread 300 of 423 (page 2): RE: Winmodem 288 this > time.. > > Anthony > > -- > Anthony Hill | an171@FreeNet.Carleton.CA > Agreed with Anthony! I too have a Winmodem and more often than not, I'll connect to my ISP at 26400. Seldom do I connect at 28800, but I have perhaps 20% of the time. Sadly to say, I feel that this discussion will be moot in a couple of years when ISDN and Cable modems will all leave the 28.8 crowd in the molasses! For now, enjoy what you can!!! -- Thread 300 of 423 (page 3): RE: Winmodem 288 -- -- James Gallegos | "Every one of life's actions Newark, CA USA | is relative to the moment " jamesgal@ix.netcom.com | JKG Thu, 18 Apr 1996 13:01:13 comp.dcom.modems Thread 300 of 423 Lines 15 Re: Winmodem 288 Respno 1 of 2 happy@gtalumni.org Pete 'Happy' Thomas at Painless Computing Too true! I'm in the 'burbs of D.C.--not a backwater, at all--but my phone lines are so crummy, that I cannot reliably get anything better than 16800--and I often have trouble sending and receiving faxes. The phone company shrugs and offers to come out and fix things with line conditioners, etc.--for $100s. I'll go ISDN (or cable modem (?) as soon as its feasible and a little more economical. --Pete James Gallegos wrote: > Agreed with Anthony! I too have a Winmodem and more often than not, I'll > connect to my ISP at 26400. Seldom do I connect at 28800, but I have > perhaps 20% of the time. Sadly to say, I feel that this discussion will Thread 300 of 423, Resp 1/2 (page 2): Re: Winmodem 288 > be moot in a couple of years when ISDN and Cable modems will all leave the > 28.8 crowd in the molasses! For now, enjoy what you can!!! Thu, 18 Apr 1996 23:26:02 comp.dcom.modems Thread 300 of 423 Lines 19 Re: Winmodem 288 Respno 2 of 2 JNavas@NavasGrp.com John Navas at The Navas Group of Dublin, CA, USA [Posted to comp.dcom.modems] Pete 'Happy' Thomas wrote: >Too true! I'm in the 'burbs of D.C.--not a backwater, at all--but my phone >lines are so crummy, that I cannot reliably get anything better than 16800--and >I often have trouble sending and receiving faxes. The phone company shrugs and >offers to come out and fix things with line conditioners, etc.--for $100s. I'l >go ISDN (or cable modem (?) as soon as its feasible and a little more >economical. You might try ordering a new analog phone line, and don't accept the Thread 300 of 423, Resp 2/2 (page 2): Re: Winmodem 288 installation until you can get good data rates. Then cancel the old phone line. This has worked for me on a number of occasions when nothing else would. -- Best regards, John mailto:JNavas@NavasGrp.com http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/ 28800 Modem FAQ: http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/modem/faq.html h=help h=help h=help h=help Fri, 19 Apr 1996 00:05:57 comp.dcom.modems Thread 348 of 423 Lines 13 USR 28,800 Data/Fax Connection Problem 1 Response mziegler@itis.com IntraNet, Inc. I recently purchased a USRobotics 28,800 data/fax modem (internal). I have a 4h windows 3.1. I am consistantly getting connected at 14,400 or 16,800. What can I do to corr? I also get garbage characters coming in when I should be entering my user name . We just installed a new seperate phone line for the computer and have a data/lis line. When I connect with my older 14,400 internal on a different Com port and. Thread 348 of 423 (page 2): USR 28,800 Data/Fax Connection Problem Should I just give up on the new modem? Would a different brand modem be bett? Seems several are pleased with their Motorola. Any advice, places to look on the web would be greatly appreciated. Fri, 19 Apr 1996 11:44:55 comp.dcom.modems Thread 348 of 423 Lines 14 Re: USR 28,800 Data/Fax Connection Problem Respno 1 of 1 JNavas@NavasGrp.com John Navas at The Navas Group of Dublin, CA, USA [Posted to comp.dcom.modems] mziegler@itis.com wrote: >I recently purchased a USRobotics 28,800 data/fax modem (internal). I have a h >windows 3.1. > >I am consistantly getting connected at 14,400 or 16,800. What can I do to cor? See my FAQ. -- Best regards, Thread 348 of 423, Resp 1/1 (page 2): Re: USR 28,800 Data/Fax Connection Probl John mailto:JNavas@NavasGrp.com http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/ 28800 Modem FAQ: http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/modem/faq.html h=help h=help Fri, 19 Apr 1996 08:42:48 comp.dcom.modems Thread 359 of 423 Lines 31 USR 28.8 VOICE 4 Responses mfisher@isis.com Michael Fisher at Isis Distributed Systems Hi, I just got a USR Sportster Voice with a full-duplex speakerphone. It seems to be working alright even through I have not used it too much. I also got the Windows 95 Unimodem Drivers and as of right now, I don't think they will support this modem. Is this right? Also, while using the Message Center software that comes with the modem (I need to find something better that runs WIN32 and has a little more programmability!!) I have had the software and the modem get out of synch and things no longer work. It seems like the software thinks the modem is still in use doing something and won't do anything else. It seems the only way to fix this is a re-boot. If I Thread 359 of 423 (page 2): USR 28.8 VOICE sent the modem an ATZ to reset it, does not have any effect. Has anyone else with one of these things (I know they are new) seen anything like this? Does anyone have any suggestions as to what might be happening??? And does USR have an .inf file that will work with this modem. I have to install it as Sportster 28.8 Internal and if I try the newer .inf from the WEB page, I can't even install it.... Thanks for any info. Mike Michael Fisher (mfisher@isis.com or mfisher@net-gate.com) Isis Distributed Systems Home Page -- http://www.net-gate.com/~mfisher Thread 359 of 423 (page 3): USR 28.8 VOICE Fri, 19 Apr 1996 11:47:54 comp.dcom.modems Thread 359 of 423 Lines 23 Re: USR 28.8 VOICE Respno 1 of 4 JNavas@NavasGrp.com John Navas at The Navas Group of Dublin, CA, USA [Posted to comp.dcom.modems] mfisher@isis.com (Michael Fisher) wrote: > I just got a USR Sportster Voice with a full-duplex speakerphone. It >seems to be working alright even through I have not used it too much. >I also got the Windows 95 Unimodem Drivers and as of right now, I >don't think they will support this modem. Is this right? Correct -- Unimodem V does not support the Sportster. However, Delrina CommSuite 95 does support it in TAPI mode for fax/data/voice. > And does USR have an .inf file that will work with this modem. I have >to install it as Sportster 28.8 Internal and if I try the newer .inf >from the WEB page, I can't even install it.... Thread 359 of 423, Resp 1/4 (page 2): Re: USR 28.8 VOICE The INF file from the USR FTP site should work fine. What do you mean you can't even install it? Did you copy the INF file to \WINDOWS\INF, Remove the modem in Conntrol Panel, and then Add it back with auto-detect. -- Best regards, John mailto:JNavas@NavasGrp.com http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/ 28800 Modem FAQ: http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/modem/faq.html Fri, 19 Apr 1996 20:09:01 comp.dcom.modems Thread 359 of 423 Lines 28 Re: USR 28.8 VOICE Respno 2 of 4 smithwt@med.unc.edu William Thomas Smith at UNC-CH School of Medicine In article <4l85ek$e96@ns1.net-gate.com>, Michael Fisher wrote: > > And does USR have an .inf file that will work with this modem. I have >to install it as Sportster 28.8 Internal and if I try the newer .inf >from the WEB page, I can't even install it.... > >Thanks for any info. > >Mike > >Michael Fisher (mfisher@isis.com or mfisher@net-gate.com) Mike - Thread 359 of 423, Resp 2/4 (page 2): Re: USR 28.8 VOICE Get the .inf file from ftp.usr.com using a BINARY transfer. Should make things work for you. I'm using TalkWorks add-on to Delrina WinFax Pro 7.0 for phone messaging. Seems to make the Windows Unimodem drivers work for me. Bill Bill Smith UNC School of Medicine http://www.pearsalls.com Sat, 20 Apr 1996 12:53:03 comp.dcom.modems Thread 359 of 423 Lines 11 Re: USR 28.8 VOICE Respno 3 of 4 dennist300@aol.com DennisT300 at America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) In article <3177c307.3803065@news.aimnet.com>, JNavas@NavasGrp.com (John Navas) writes: >Correct -- Unimodem V does not support the Sportster. However, Delrina >CommSuite 95 does support it in TAPI mode for fax/data/voice. Unimodem V doesn't support any Sportster? Also, I want a 33.6 voice modem and software that will handle voice, fax and data on one line without distinctive ring. Any recommendations? Thanks. Sat, 20 Apr 1996 19:21:54 comp.dcom.modems Thread 359 of 423 Lines 18 Re: USR 28.8 VOICE Respno 4 of 4 Rigor@clever.net Matt Fox at Best Internet Communications In article <4lb89v$sq0@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, dennist300@aol.com says... > >In article <3177c307.3803065@news.aimnet.com>, JNavas@NavasGrp.com (John >Navas) writes: > >>Correct -- Unimodem V does not support the Sportster. However, Delrina >>CommSuite 95 does support it in TAPI mode for fax/data/voice. > >Unimodem V doesn't support any Sportster? > Thread 359 of 423, Resp 4/4 (page 2): Re: USR 28.8 VOICE basically because there wasnt any voice sportsters out when the unimodem V software was in development. they might be working on it now.. ? Fri, 19 Apr 1996 08:58:50 comp.dcom.modems Thread 360 of 423 Lines 13 USR (USA) adaptor problem for spanish use. No responses ester@tid.tid.es GONZALEZ DE LANGARICA at Telefonica I+D I have recently purchased a USR 28.8 sportster modem in the US and I didn't realized that it uses a really special adaptor (120 AC- 20 AC) and it is not easy to find a (220 AC- 20AC) here in Spain. Initially I used a (220 AC-120 AC) adaptor plugged into the (120 AC-20 AC) one but Ihave burned down the latter one due to a frequency problem. Has any one had the same problem and knows what to do? Thanks a 'Bunch' Ester. . h=help Fri, 19 Apr 1996 12:10:13 comp.dcom.modems Thread 363 of 423 Lines 31 Loop Loss Disconnects - USR 28.8 1 Response vanoosaj@interlog.com Tony Van Oostrom at InterLog Internet Services Greetings: I have a USR 28.8 with the 33.6 upgrade chip in it. I am experiencing frequent disconnects on my modem. When I type in ati6 after it disconnects, in winsock, it says the reason for the disconnect is "loop loss disonnect". I have been working with this problem for a few months now. Tried some special login scripts on the Navas page, tried adjusting all the settings in the winsock from ultra conservative MTU 1006, Rwin 1536 and TCP MSS 512 to other settings like MTU 1006, Rwin2096 and TCP MSS 966, with baud set to 57,600 and/or 38,400. Hardware H. on, van Jacob on, online status detect none, TCP rto max 60. USR has recently provided me with a replacement modem, but I am now finding the same problem. Although the "new" modem they sent me ws older Thread 363 of 423 (page 2): Loop Loss Disconnects - USR 28.8 than the one I puchased last year ( I will get that corrected). Does anyone have any ideas what I can try next. I do have a 16550 UART (super IO). I have read that sometimes these are defective, especially early ones. Mine is about 2 years old. I do not think the problem is the phone line, because with other USR 28.8 modems I have not had this problem. I am getting desperate...if any one has some practical suggestions, I would apprecaite them very much.. Thanks -- Tony Van Oostrom Aurora, Ontario Canada Thread 363 of 423 (page 3): Loop Loss Disconnects - USR 28.8 Internet: vanoosaj@interlog.com Fri, 19 Apr 1996 16:39:47 comp.dcom.modems Thread 363 of 423 Lines 17 Re: Loop Loss Disconnects - USR 28.8 Respno 1 of 1 JNavas@NavasGrp.com John Navas at The Navas Group of Dublin, CA, USA [Posted to comp.dcom.modems] Tony Van Oostrom wrote: >I have a USR 28.8 with the 33.6 upgrade chip in it. I am experiencing >frequent disconnects on my modem. When I type in ati6 after it >disconnects, in winsock, it says the reason for the disconnect is "loop >loss disonnect". ... You're losing the connection. The remote modem may be hanging up on you (possibly due to excessive line problems and/or modem incompatibilities), or you may be getting momentary breaks in the connection. Try increasing the S10 value by a factor of 2x or 3x. -- Thread 363 of 423, Resp 1/1 (page 2): Re: Loop Loss Disconnects - USR 28.8 Best regards, John mailto:JNavas@NavasGrp.com http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/ 28800 Modem FAQ: http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/modem/faq.html h=help Fri, 19 Apr 1996 13:37:21 comp.dcom.modems Thread 367 of 423 Lines 21 Re: Help With USR Sportster 28.8? Freezes Sy1 Response what@not.me Ricky at ## On 11 Apr 1996 04:41:32 GMT, crichter@itis.com (Calvin Richter) wrote: >In article <31623f26.15186372@news2.microserve.net>, >budman@budland.microserve.com says... >> >>On Sat, 30 Mar 1996 18:07:40 GMT, dgray@empnet.com (Don Gray) wrote: >> >>>Having problems with new USR Sportster 28.8 external modem and Win95. >> >> what type of Video >>Card do you have. If it has an S3 chip on it, then you can't use >>COM2, or COM4. > >COM2 should be OK. The problem is that some dual chipset cards (some Thread 367 of 423 (page 2): Re: Help With USR Sportster 28.8? Freezes System! >Diamond cards being among them) attempt to use the I/O range normally >used by COM4. > > > set your modem to generic 9600 and set speed to 33400 Fri, 19 Apr 1996 20:10:05 comp.dcom.modems Thread 367 of 423 Lines 29 Re: Help With USR Sportster 28.8? Freezes SyRespno 1 of 1 JNavas@NavasGrp.com John Navas at The Navas Group of Dublin, CA, USA [Posted to comp.dcom.modems] what@not.me (Ricky) wrote: >On 11 Apr 1996 04:41:32 GMT, crichter@itis.com (Calvin Richter) wrote: > >>In article <31623f26.15186372@news2.microserve.net>, >>budman@budland.microserve.com says... >>> >>>On Sat, 30 Mar 1996 18:07:40 GMT, dgray@empnet.com (Don Gray) wrote: >>> >>>>Having problems with new USR Sportster 28.8 external modem and Win95. >>> >>> what type of Video >>>Card do you have. If it has an S3 chip on it, then you can't use Thread 367 of 423, Resp 1/1 (page 2): Re: Help With USR Sportster 28.8? Freez >>>COM2, or COM4. >> >>COM2 should be OK. The problem is that some dual chipset cards (some >>Diamond cards being among them) attempt to use the I/O range normally >>used by COM4. >> >set your modem to generic 9600 and set speed to 33400 Bad advice -- the information won't be optimized for USR (and that speed is invalid -- presumably you meant 38,400). -- Best regards, John mailto:JNavas@NavasGrp.com http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/ 28800 Modem FAQ: http://web.aimnet.com/~jnavas/modem/faq.html