THE WIRED FUTURE PART THREE Sabre Rattling by Robert Parson In the Halls of Congress and at various Regulatory Agencies the Phone Lobby and the Cable Lobby are trying to keep each other from getting into certain areas. The Phone Lobby wants to keep Cable Companies from providing personal communications. The Cable Lobby wants to keep the Phone Companies from providing data services. So far, Cable Companies have made a little more progress than the Phone Companies. But that is mainly because the hands of the Phone Companies are tied more tightly than the Cable Companies. While the Phone Companies are trying to beat down the regulations that keep them from being more than gateways to services, the Cable Companies have been step by step becoming gateways to services and in actually brokering those services to clients. The Phone Companies currently must provide a node to anyone who wishes for one and can pay for it. Currently the major players are Tymnet, Telenet, CompuServe and GE. Those four then broker access to clients either through their own services (such as the CompuServe to Dialog gateway) or directly to the information service (Such as Tymnet to Dow Jones News Service). Some of the Phone Companies do have Regional Networks, but again they are simply gateways to information providers and cannot provide information themselves. However, the Cable Companies are in an enviable position, compared to the Phone Companies. They not only provide the access, but they can deny access also. They can also broker services to clients. As far as data is concerned, the major player in this field is XPress. XPress provides News, weather, sports and stocks through the cable companies. A subscriber must have a computer to access this but it is the beginning of the Cable Industry as the one stop Information Provider. The Cable Companies have another jump on the Information on Demand business, in a way. Pay Per View, which permits customers to view special events in their homes at a premium, is a start. During the Winter Olympics, Cable tried a bold experiment. They provided Wall-to-Wall (24 hour non-stop) coverage on many cable systems of most Olympic events. This was accomplished through Multi-Plexing. Basically, one person could watch continuous coverage of Hockey while another person was able to watch continuous coverage of Skiing at the same time. HBO is expected to begin experimenting with Multi-Plexing later this year. Meanwhile the Phone Companies are making headway in setting themselves up as Information Providers. Their argument is that as the nation's largest publishers of print phone directories, they should be permitted to publish those electronically as well. Already they are selling them to third parties who in turn publish them on CD-Rom or as on line services. But so far, they are prohibited from doing this themselves. But in the ten years since the breakup of the AT&T system, they have constantly petitioned the Courts, Congress, the Federal Communications Commission and others to loosen those restrictions. In the past two years those petitions have been looked upon with less hostility than they had previously. As far as Phone Companies are concerned, there are two wildcards. The first wild card is that only the companies that were part of the AT&T system had those tight restrictions. Regulations concerning Phone Companies not previously a part of AT&T, except for allowing AT&T to be a vendor for long distance service, are not as strict. One of them, in fact, is already providing online directories. Cincinnati Bell also serves as a primary gateway to a University's computer classrooms, and brokers that service to clients. The Baby Bells may use those unusual circumstances to their advantage, claiming the Court Order divesting them from AT&T creates a disadvantage. The second wild card is AT&T itself. The Divestiture Order that created the Baby Bells prohibited the Baby Bells from getting into the Information business because they were in charge of providing local customers with access to services. Permitting them to be Information Providers could have stacked the deck to far into their favor. Many of those restrictions were not placed on AT&T because it no longer had near direct access to potential clients. AT&T has emphasized it's line of personal computers. It has also branched into electronic mail with AT&T Mail which could later lead to providing Information Services. So far, the deck seems stacked in favor of the Phone Companies as far as providing that One Wire Access to all Information Services. The image is that after divestiture, the phone companies were crippled. They are now actually in a stronger position than they were before. The Cable Industry paints itself as the poor upstart underdog. The truth is that the Cable Industry is almost as large as the Phone Industry. Although it's history dates back to the late 1950s, the Cable Industry went through its adolescence in the 80s. All told nearly 60% of the nation is wired for cable. Some communities even have an 80% penetration rate. It's quite possible Cable could be as pervasive as the telephone by the end of the century. What's more, the Cable Industry learned from the mistakes of the Phone Industry. They are very carefully stepping around the minefield left by the Phone Industry's growth, decline and rebirth. After fighting with each other there will likely be some convoluted merger between Phone Companies and Cable Companies. Each will carve up their slice of the market and we'll have MultiMedia in our homes through one wire. It will provide us with personal communication, current events, entertainment, and education; all with full motion video and sound. But while the Phone Companies and the Cable Companies argue, another player could steal the cards from the dealer. Next: Pulling the Plug (c)1992 Robert Parson