#clip Hollywood has shown little interest in depicting or criticizing Communist crimes. (Barnes New Republic 11/30/92) magazine article Barnes, Fred Washington Diarist: O.K., you win <magazine>The New Republic <date>November 30, 1992 <vol>207 <num>23 <pages>43 <excerpt> Enough of the election. Let's look at Hollywood, where history is turned into movies with remarkable speed. But not in the case of <it>Stalin</it>, the new HBO movie starring Robert Duvall. It's thirty, forty, fifty years too late. The producers of <it>Stalin</it> are like those cynical contributors to political campaigns who donate after the election and direct their money to the winners. Communism is dead, the Soviet Union is gone, and Hollywood is cranking up for a full-throated anti-Communist crusade. This may be better late than never, but it's not much. The movie concentrates on Stalin's life inside the Kremlin, not the destruction and death of millions he caused outside. Still, it's an improvement. Communism was the greatest evil of the second half of the twentieth century, but Hollywood was chiefly devoted to attacking anti-communism--in Chile, El Salvador, Indonesia, Washington, wherever, even in Hollywood itself. I'm not a big moviegoer, but without any trouble at all I can come up with a long list of anti-anti-Communist movies. I admit some of them were entertaining. I liked <it>Dr. Strangelove</it> and <it>Seven Days in May</it> and <it>The Year of Living Dangerously</it>. As for anti-Communist movies, the list is short. The best was <it>Hanoi Hilton</it>, directed by my friend Lionel Chetwynd. <it>The Hunt for Red October</it> wasn't bad. The only memorable anti-Communist hero in movies of the last thirty, forty years was Rambo, a cartoon character. And his main gripe was not with the Communists, but with Pentagon bureaucrats back in Washington. <comment> Why isn't Communism considered the greatest evil of the entire twentieth century, or any century? (See medvedev stalin new york times.) </o>