Document 0681 DOCN M94A0681 TI Unsafe sex among gay men: towards a new intervention strategy. DT 9412 AU Gold R; Rosenthal D; Faculty of Education, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Vic. SO Annu Conf Australas Soc HIV Med. 1993 Oct 28-30;5:41 (abstract no. TE8). Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE ASHM5/94348974 AB OBJECTIVE. To examine the effectiveness of an intervention strategy based on men's justifications for breaking their own safe sex rules. METHOD: We report an intervention study in which 109 gay men who had slipped up (i.e., broken their safe sex rules by having unprotected intercourse) kept diaries of their sexual behaviour for 16 weeks. After four weeks they were randomly allocated to one of three conditions, two involving very brief interventions--Cognitive (examination of self-justifications for having unsafe sex) and Standard (examination of posters used in AIDS education)--and a Control (diary only). There were two interventions--at 4 and at 8 weeks. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A disturbing proportion of the participants continued to have unsafe sex over the course of the study. However, results suggest that, compared to the Standard group, the Cognitive group believed that the intervention was more likely to prevent them from slipping-up and that, in the post-intervention period, the Cognitive group was less likely than the other two groups to have multiple unsafe sexual encounters. The study indicates that using cognitive strategies that require individuals to reflect on their thinking may be an effective way to reduce the number of gay men who relapse into unsafe sex. DE Adult Condoms Homosexuality/*PSYCHOLOGY Human HIV Infections/*PREVENTION & CONTROL/PSYCHOLOGY/TRANSMISSION Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Male Risk Factors *Sex Behavior *Sex Education CLINICAL TRIAL MEETING ABSTRACT RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL SOURCE: National Library of Medicine. NOTICE: This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.Code).