Document 0990 DOCN M94A0990 TI Adapting GPA guidelines for the clinical management of HIV infection to national use. An evaluation of the outcome. DT 9412 AU Margolis CZ; Wabitsch R; Ben-Gurion University Faculty of Health Sciences, Beer-Sheva,; Israel. SO Int Conf AIDS. 1994 Aug 7-12;10(2):234 (abstract no. PB0950). Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE ICA10/94371585 AB OBJECTIVES: GPA's guidelines, presented as clinical algorithms, were adapted in a standard fashion in a number of countries. This study evaluates the extent and the type of differences between the GPA model guidelines and two nationally adapted versions. METHODS: Two different techniques, the Clinical Algorithms Patient Analysis (CAPA) and Clinical Algorithm Nosology (CAN), were used to compare the three sets of guidelines. In short the CAN technique translates the clinical logic of each individual step between algorithm boxes into a set of If ... then conditional statements. These statements serve to pinpoint the difference in the logic of the algorithms. The CAPA technique then defines a hypothetical patient for each pathway (e.g. chronic diarrhoea), analysing the difference in the management advice. RESULTS: The analysis shows that the guidelines structure was maintained to a large degree (66%). However, patients were managed differently, 83% in the area of diagnosis and therapy and 17% related to disease prevalence. CONCLUSION: The adaptation process of GPA clinical guidelines preserves the original algorithm structure to a large extent but may involve significant modifications in the content of clinical care that could affect care outcome. DE Algorithms Comparative Study Human HIV Infections/*THERAPY Practice Guidelines/*STANDARDS World Health Organization MEETING ABSTRACT SOURCE: National Library of Medicine. NOTICE: This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.Code).