Document 2675 DOCN M94A2675 TI Cost effectiveness of different confirmatory HIV testing schedules in Colombia. DT 9412 AU Boshell J; Gonzalez M; Rey E; Rojas MC; Marrugo S; Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogota, Colombia. SO Int Conf AIDS. 1994 Aug 7-12;10(1):250 (abstract no. PB0429). Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE ICA10/94369900 AB OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of two different testing strategies for HIV infection using data from a follow-up study. METHODS: The NIH of Colombia (Instituto Nacional Salud-INS) in Bogota is the HIV-Nat. Reference Lab. and performs WB testing on all sera with an Initial Reactive Screening Assay (IRSA) submitted by Blood Banks and public and Private labs in the country. A total of 6648 WB tests were performed between 1990-93 and 1644 had in Indeterminate (IND) report following the allgorithm IRSA-WB-REPORT. We traced 134 IND individual for whom additional sera were available after the first INS report. RESULTS: Forty seven of 134 samples (35%) became negative in the WB after a time interval of (3-143) weeks, 22 became positive (16%) after (2-130) weeks and 65 continued to give an IND WB serology after (3-165) weeks of follow-up. We were able to assay an average of 2,3 (2-4) 2,1(2-3) and 2,4 (2-6) samples in each category. A second ELISA (Abbott) was performed at the INS on the 65 samples in the IND category after follow-up: 51 were negative (79%) an 14 (21%) continued positive. Reactivity for HILV-I antibodies was tested by ELISA and WB, in 32 (49%) of these 65 IND sera: none were WB positive. PCR has not yet been performed on any sample. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Many international agencies (WHO, PAHO, CDC) recommend that only duplicate repeat reactive initial screening results be confirmed by a supplemental test. Our experience confirms this recommendation, as we found that 79% of the samples giving an IND WB result were not repeatedly reactive by ELISA. If this result holds true for the 1644 IND WBs performed in our 3 year study period, it would suggest that 1299 of these assays were unnecesary. If we take in to account a cost of US$60 per assay we could have saved 60 x 1299 x 2.4 = US$187.056.00 by performing a repeated ELISA before carrying out the WB. DE AIDS Serodiagnosis/*ECONOMICS Blotting, Western/ECONOMICS Colombia Comparative Study Cost-Benefit Analysis *Developing Countries Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/ECONOMICS Follow-Up Studies Human HIV Antigens/*BLOOD HIV Seropositivity/*DIAGNOSIS/ECONOMICS/IMMUNOLOGY Predictive Value of Tests MEETING ABSTRACT SOURCE: National Library of Medicine. NOTICE: This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.Code).