Document 0195 DOCN M9580195 TI A comparison of zidovudine, didanosine, zalcitabine and no antiretroviral therapy in patients with advanced HIV disease. DT 9506 AU Torres RA; Barr MR; McIntyre KI; Thornton JR; Shay WM; Feldman RD; George NJ; Britton DJ; AIDS Center, St Vincent's Hospital and Medical Center of New; York, NY 10011, USA. SO Int J STD AIDS. 1995 Jan-Feb;6(1):19-26. Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE MED/95244659 AB Three nucleoside analogues, zidovudine (AZT), didanosine (ddI), and zalcitabine (ddC), are approved for use in the treatment of patients with HIV infection. This retrospective study compares the 3 drugs and examines the overall utility of antiretroviral therapy by way of comparisons to a no treatment (No Rx) group in patients with advanced HIV disease. Patients with advanced HIV disease were enrolled in didanosine (August 1989-December 1990) or zalcitabine (October 1990-February 1992) expanded access programmes; continued on zidovudine treatment despite fulfilling criteria for zidovudine failure or intolerance; or maintained on no antiretroviral treatment. Statistical analysis revealed that patients on nucleoside analogue therapy had fewer opportunistic infections (P = 0.001) than those who received no antiretroviral treatment. The Kaplan-Meier 12-month estimate of survival was significantly longer among patients who switched from zidovudine to zalcitabine but not among patients who switched to didanosine, when compared to the other 2 groups (P = 0.05). DE Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/COMPLICATIONS/*DRUG THERAPY Adult Aged Comparative Study Didanosine/ADVERSE EFFECTS/*THERAPEUTIC USE Female Follow-Up Studies Human Male Middle Age Retrospective Studies Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Survival Analysis Zalcitabine/ADVERSE EFFECTS/*THERAPEUTIC USE Zidovudine/ADVERSE EFFECTS/*THERAPEUTIC USE CLINICAL TRIAL CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL JOURNAL ARTICLE SOURCE: National Library of Medicine. NOTICE: This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.Code).