Document 0260 DOCN M9590260 TI Comparison of the operational effectiveness of general practice versus hospital sites in a phase II HIV clinical trial. DT 9509 AU Hales G; Beveridge A; Anderson J; Mitchell J; Schreurs E; Smith D; CHATN, Darlinghurst. SO Annu Conf Australas Soc HIV Med. 1994 Nov 3-6;6:263 (unnumbered poster). Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE ASHM6/95291839 AB OBJECTS: Data on Australian recruitment rates was examined to compare the operational effectiveness of General Practice sites versus hospital sites in an intensive phase II clinical trial. METHODS: The trial required 150 participants to attend trial sites at least monthly. The visits required clinical assessment, collection of blood samples before noon for complex assays, IM drug administration and monitoring for one hour post therapy. Effectiveness was determined by the time taken to recruit the target number. All sites were coordinated through CHATN with equal provision of research nurse time and other support. RESULTS: 2 hospitals and 8 GP sites were activated, 153 patients have been enrolled to date. TABULAR DATA, SEE ABSTRACT VOLUME. CONCLUSIONS: GP sites were as effective as hospital sites in enrolling eligible patients as hospital sites in this trial. The strength of the individual doctor-patient relationship in general practice may have been one of the factors which facilitated this. GP sites should therefore be considered as effective venues for future HIV clinical trials. DE Antiviral Agents/*THERAPEUTIC USE Australia Comparative Study *Family Practice Human HIV Infections/*DRUG THERAPY Injections, Intramuscular *Outpatient Clinics, Hospital Patient Selection Treatment Outcome CLINICAL TRIAL CLINICAL TRIAL, PHASE II MEETING ABSTRACT SOURCE: National Library of Medicine. NOTICE: This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.Code).