Document 0718 DOCN M9590718 TI Specificity of viral DNA integration in vitro and in vivo. DT 9509 AU Coffin J; Withers-Ward E; Barnes J; Kitamura Y; Tufts University School of Medicine. Department of Molecular; Biology and Microbiology, Boston, MA SO NIH Conf Retroviral Integrase. 1995 Jan 19-20;:(Session I, speakers' abstracts - unpaged). Unique Identifier : AIDSLINE AIDS/95920001 AB To understand the role of DNA sequence and structure in targeting integration to specific sites or regions of the genome, we have developed a highly sensitive PCR-based assay capable of detecting with single-base resolution, a single molecule of proviral DNA into the cellular genome in 10-6 cells. Using this assay we have investigated the use of simple plasmid DNA targets for integration in vitro and natural or inserted DNA sequences as integration targets in infected cells. In vitro, we found that integration targets are distributed across the target regions examined, but highly non-randomly. The pattern of use of specific regions seems to be related to local DNA structure more than sequence, and is independent of the broader context of the target sequence. Specificity can be modified by methylation of C residues in alternating G-C regions and as few as 2 methyl groups in (CG)3 are sufficient to create a strong target site. In vivo, we have found that the majority of integration events are widely distributed in the cell genome. Comparison of the usage as integration targets of 8 randomly chosen regions with 4 regions preselected by virtue of prior integration events indicates little or no regional bias or avoidance of specific sequences. As with in vitro integration, there is a highly non-random pattern of local preference and aversion for specific sites, with some sites being used more than 100-fold greater than expected from a random distribution, and others, presumably, correspondingly less. Similar but much more intense patterns can be seen with multicopy DNA targets suggesting that all or most copies have the same specificity, despite potential differences in location. Finally, sequences introduced by transfection also serve as integration targets as efficiently as endogenous sequences, and display similar patterns of targeting in vitro and in vivo. We are currently developing this system to examine directly effects of transfection factor binding and transcription per se on the selection of integration targets. DE Binding Sites Cytosine/METABOLISM DNA, Viral/*GENETICS/METABOLISM Genome, Viral Guanine/METABOLISM Methylation Plasmids Polymerase Chain Reaction Proviruses/*GENETICS Transcription, Genetic Virus Integration/*GENETICS MEETING ABSTRACT SOURCE: National Library of Medicine. NOTICE: This material may be protected by Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.Code).